Trump Is Spiraling, and Getting Creepier, About Women Voters
In 2012, the GOP fielded candidates who didn’t know how our bodies worked. In 2024, Trump drones on about protecting us, and is equally disturbing.
In 2012, it seemed like Republicans hit their low in talking about women. Missouri GOP Senate candidate Todd Akin insisted that we couldn’t get pregnant after rape because “if it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.” Indiana GOP Senate candidate Richard Mourdock said, “Even when life begins in that horrible situation of rape, that’s something God intended to happen.” GOP megadonor Foster Friess said “gals” just “put aspirin between their knees” as contraception when he was younger.
Presidential candidate Mitt Romney talked about having “binders full of women” he could hire, although he didn’t choose one as vice president, and nobody liked the idea of women being shut up in binders anyway. Of course, he was the least bad of them—he called on Akin to drop out of the race, which Akin did not and lost it to Claire McCaskill. But Romney had taken that sad procession from being a pro-choice Massachusetts governor to being an anti-choice automaton.
Related Articles
They didn’t really know how our bodies worked—they didn’t care—and that year, we shut their whole thing down.
Four years later, though, this country elected Donald Trump, who had been credibly charged of sexual abuse by two dozen women and is now an adjudicated rapist following his conviction in E. Jean Carroll’s suit against him last year. And Trump is sounding ever scarier as he talks about women in the last few days—especially as he talks about “protecting” us. He seems more and more like the world’s oldest incel, and it matters.
In recent speeches in North Carolina and, last night, in Pennsylvania, Trump has reiterated what he wrote in a Truth Social post when claiming to be a “protector” of women. As Jeet Heer pointed out, it’s a ludicrous claim that completely misses the role of Dobbs in mobilizing women voters. But the fact that he’s repeating this message again—and that the Truth Social post is as grammatically garbled as it is deranged—bears noting. Trump is spiraling when it comes to women, and is getting ready to blame us for his loss in November. I hesitate to predict he will lose, but it’s getting impossible to avoid.
Focus on how menacing his speech in Pennsylvania sounds:“We have to talk, because I always thought women liked me.” (We don’t, Donald. We always vote against you. Only three of us married you. And where is Melania these days?)
“I never thought I had a problem. But the fake news keeps saying women don’t like me. I don’t believe it. They like to have strong borders, they like to have safety.” (We like strong borders around our bodily autonomy, Donald, which you and your Supreme Court picks have violated.)
He went on: “I make this statement to the great women of our country. Sadly, women are poorer than they were four years ago, are less healthy than they were four years ago, are less safe on the streets than they were four years ago, are paying much higher prices for groceries and everything else than they were four years ago,
None of this is true. On the day he said it, the FBI confirmed that crime rates have tumbled. Women’s (and men’s) incomes are higher. Some grocery prices are higher, some lower. And if our health has worsened (and it hasn’t, overall), it’s because Trump’s Supreme Court made pregnancy a much more deadly condition than it was before 2022.
“I will fix all of that, and fast, and at long last this nation, and national nightmare, will end. It will end. Because I am your protector. I want to be your protector. As president, I have to be your protector. I hope you don’t make too much of it. I hope the fake news doesn’t go, ‘Oh he wants to be their protector.’ Well, I am. As president, I have to be your protector.”
That’s some scary, incel shit. What makes me think about incels is their completely faulty way of sizing up male-female relationships, and what makes them work. We don’t want a protector. We want a partner.
Also, we all know Trump is a predator, not a protector.
Oh, he also trashed the woman who is ready to become our first female president, Vice President Kamala Harris. “She’s worse than him,” Trump said, comparing Harris to Joe Biden. “I’m telling you, watch. She’s not as smart as him. He’s not smart, he never was smart…. But she is a very dumb person. And we can’t do that. We can’t do that. I don’t want to be rude.”
Meanwhile, over in Ohio, GOP Senate candidate Bernie Moreno had more dumb words about women. He’s angry at suburban women who prioritize abortion rights with their votes, but that’s not all: “It’s a little crazy by the way, but—especially for women that are like past 50—I’m thinking to myself, ‘I don’t think that’s an issue for you.’”
Popular
“swipe left below to view more authors”Swipe →Um, Bernie? I have a daughter. I have nieces—and nephews, too. Every one of them cares about reproductive justice. If you don’t think many of us are livid that we’ve seen our daughters lose rights that our mothers had… you don’t know us. You’re as clueless as Todd Akin or Foster Friess. And I believe you’ll go down in history as a footnote to Senator Sherrod Brown’s racking up another historic win in Ohio in November.
Can we count on you?
In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.
We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.
Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.
Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.
Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation
More from The Nation
Behind the Harris Campaign’s Quest for the Mythical “Cheney Democrats” Behind the Harris Campaign’s Quest for the Mythical “Cheney Democrats”
Kamala Harris is trying to appeal to centrist Republicans, but what if they don’t exist? And what if the search for them leads her to abandon the Democratic base?
Immunity Doesn’t Apply to Trump for January 6 Immunity Doesn’t Apply to Trump for January 6
A new filing by special counsel Jack Smith argues that even in light of the Supreme Court ruling granting immunity to presidents, a seeker of office is liable for criminal activit...
Trump—and His Supporters—Are Now Reveling in Blatantly Fascist Calls to Violence Trump—and His Supporters—Are Now Reveling in Blatantly Fascist Calls to Violence
Trump’s base loves it not because the former president wants to fight crime but because he wants retribution.
No, JD Vance Did Not Win the Debate on Abortion No, JD Vance Did Not Win the Debate on Abortion
Mainstream journalists are making something very simple too complicated: Republicans want a national abortion ban.