August 27, 2024

Trump Sues the Justice Department for $100 Million

Déjà vu all over again.

James D. Zirin
Former US president Donald Trump speaks to members of the media after testifying in his civil fraud trial at the New York State Supreme Court in New York City on November 6, 2023.

Former US president Donald Trump speaks to members of the media after testifying in his civil fraud trial at the New York State Supreme Court in New York City on November 6, 2023.


(Adam Gray / AFP / Getty)

Apart from campaigning, Trump continues to work his cottage industry—lawfare. He has just sued the Justice Department for $100 million. It is his inveterate number. He also loves to trash the FBI. Undermine the justice system? He does it with great relish. He did it before; he is doing it now.

It is no secret that Donald Trump doesn’t like the Justice Department or the FBI, whatever its leadership. This has been true historically, irrespective of whether it is Merrick Garland or Christopher Wray who captain the law enforcement establishment.

In 1973, the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division charged Trump and his father with violations of the Fair Housing Act. The violations occurred at 39 Trump owned and managed buildings in Brooklyn, Queens, and Staten Island.

Trump hired the fixer lawyer Roy Cohn to defend the case. He learned from Cohn the dubious approach of keeping the government off-balance and creating a sideshow that would distract from the main event. Trump charged the FBI with using Gestapo-like tactics in working up the case. He could not have blamed Christopher Wray for his legal plight. Director Wray was only 7 years old at the time. He could not have blamed AG Garland either. He might have blamed the “deep state,” but the phrase wasn’t in currency then.

The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the Trumps, as the case was drowning in evidence of systematic racial discrimination. The facts were appalling, even for 1973. It seems that when a Black “tester” sought to rent an apartment at the Trumps’s Shore Haven properties in Brooklyn, the superintendent turned her away, saying that nothing was available. Thereafter, when a white tester applied, the same superintendent said she could “immediately rent either one or two available apartments.”

Current Issue

Cover of June 2026 Issue

The white tester stated that the superintendent fessed up that his “superiors” had directed him to follow a racially discriminatory rental policy. Trump employees coded Black and Latino applications with cryptic designations such as “C” or “No. 9.”

Doormen at the premises told the FBI they were instructed to discourage Black applicants by saying the superintendent was unavailable. A super said he was instructed to send Black applicants to the central office for processing, while white applicants were accepted on the spot.

The proof also showed that Trump turned his properties into a ghetto, with minorities packed into his Patio Gardens property, which was 40 percent Black, while his Ocean Terrace apartments housed only 1 percent African Americans. The Trumps also quoted different rental terms and conditions to Black applicants.

A number of reputable lawyers told the Trumps to settle the case with a consent decree neither admitting nor denying the charges, but agreeing to discriminate no more. But Trump wanted to “fight.”

The Nation Weekly

Fridays. A weekly digest of the best of our coverage.
By signing up, you confirm that you are over the age of 16 and agree to receive occasional promotional offers for programs that support The Nation’s journalism. You may unsubscribe or adjust your preferences at any time. You can read our Privacy Policy here.

Sound familiar? A Justice Department memo noted “a long series of delaying tactics…among which were a $100 million counterclaim against the United States and a motion to hold a [Civil Rights] Division attorney in contempt of court for alleged ‘Gestapo-like’ interviewing tactics.”

With giant fanfare, Trump filed a counterclaim against the Justice Department for $100 million. The purported basis of the counterclaim was that the government had blackened his reputation by bringing the suit. He said the charges were irresponsible and baseless. The federal judge, wryly noting that $100 million was a “tidy sum,” dismissed the counterclaim two months after it was filed.

Trump learned how to work the press with Cohn holding a press conference to brief the media. He contended that Trump didn’t discriminate against Black people—only welfare recipients, and the entire case was a lie concocted by the FBI and the Justice Department. Cohn claimed his clients were victims of persecution, and demanded a hearing to show there was impropriety in the investigation. When the Justice Department put his feet to the fire, Cohn backed off, trying to put off the hearing. He was unsuccessful. After a brief hearing, the court found, as follows:

I find no evidence in the record that anything in the nature of Gestapo tactics were permitted by the FBI in doing the tasks assigned to them.

I consider that an extraordinary charge to make about an agency which, in my view, has always acted…with the utmost politeness and respect for the rules and laws of this country.…

I feel that nothing here would amount to any reason why this Court should condemn them or punish them for what they have done here. And…I therefore grant the government’s motion to strike this application from the record.

Flash forward.

Just this month, Trump filed an administrative claim against the Justice Department seeking $100 million in damages allegedly arising out of the search of his Mar-a-Lago home. What he seeks to accomplish with this lawsuit is unfathomable. He certainly doesn’t need the money. The insuperable barrier is that the search was upheld by the US Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit.

Trump’s lawyers have politicized the case. His attorney’s filing was replete with conclusory allegations. “The intrusion into President Trump’s seclusion, the abuse of process by the Garland Department of Justice and Wray FBI, and the subsequent malicious prosecution are particularly egregious, showing willful, wanton, oppressive, and malicious intent by the Department of Justice and FBI.”

The Justice Department has 180 days to review the claim, after which the case could proceed in federal court. The case will not get very far. Professor Larry Tribe of Harvard Law School expressed the immediate reaction of most lawyers: “Trump’s lawsuit seeking $100M in damages from DOJ for the Mar-a-Lago search is utterly frivolous and will just waste judicial resources.” Trump is no stranger to wasting judicial resources. Mark Twain is supposed to have said that, “History doesn’t repeat itself, but it often rhymes.”

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Huevel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

James D. Zirin

James D. Zirin, a lawyer, is the author of the new book Supremely Partisan—How Raw Politics Tips the Scales in the United States Supreme Court.

More from The Nation

Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner at a “Fighting Oligarchy” tour event in Portland, Maine, on May 25, 2026.

Graham Platner and the Rise of White-Male Identity Politics Graham Platner and the Rise of White-Male Identity Politics

Platner’s rocket to stardom reflects something ugly that’s developed, not only on the right but the left as well.

Joan Walsh

The entrance to the CBS Broadcast Center in Manhattan, New York City, on June 2, 2026.

We Took CBS’s Money. We Won’t Trade It for Silence. We Took CBS’s Money. We Won’t Trade It for Silence.

Four Mike Wallace Scholarship recipients on the rebellion at CBS News and the future of an American institution.

Talan Collins, Santiago Campos, Sebastian Broche, and Chris Gloff

Guns and Noses

Guns and Noses Guns and Noses

Burn units.

Steve Brodner

Marco Rubio, US secretary of state, from left, US President Donald Trump, and Pete Hegseth, US secretary of defense, during a cabinet meeting at the White House in Washington, DC, on Wednesday, May 27, 2026.

The House Voted to End the Iran War. Now the Real Battle Begins. The House Voted to End the Iran War. Now the Real Battle Begins.

Congress took an important symbolic step toward reasserting its authority over war powers. But much, much more needs to be done.

Jeet Heer

Congressional District 12 candidate Nina Schwalbe participates with fellow Democrats Jack Schlossberg, Micah Lasher, and George Conway in a public forum moderated by Rabbi Ammiel Hirsch at Stephen Wise Free Synagogue in New York City on May 6. 2026.

The District 12 Candidate Nobody Is Talking About The District 12 Candidate Nobody Is Talking About

“Our democracy is in deep trouble,” says Nina Schwalbe, “from vaccines to abortion to science, to SNAP, to rule of law.”

Katha Pollitt

Tom Homan, White House “border czar,” during a television interview in Washington, DC, on June 4, 2026.

The Only Thing You Need to Know About the White House’s Aliens.gov Website The Only Thing You Need to Know About the White House’s Aliens.gov Website

It’s an attempt to rile up the MAGA base over reforms to the immigration system 60 years ago.

Sasha Abramsky