July 21, 2025

How CBS Decided It Couldn’t Afford to Let Stephen Colbert Speak His Mind

The network claims it’s canceling The Late Show for financial reasons, but the real bottom line here is Trump appeasement.

Ben Schwartz

Stephen Colbert on the set of The Late Show last week.

(Scott Kowalchyk / CBS via Getty Images)

Last Thursday, President Trump, desperate for the nation to stop talking about his close personal friend and frequent travel companion Jeffrey Epstein, got a momentary reprieve. He scored a pair of major victories over his critics, real and imagined, and further reshaped the mainstream media landscape along the lines of his personal vendettas. In Washington, Congress finally cut federal funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (PBS) and National Public Radio (NPR), a goal of the right for decades. The president’s loathing for PBS and NPR is such that he threatened to primary any Republican who pushed back against it. “Any Republican that votes to allow this monstrosity to continue broadcasting will not have my support or Endorsement,” Trump announced.

To no one’s surprise, congressional Republicans did as told. They did so even though their rural constituents will be the hardest hit—people who depend on those stations for earthquake and flood warnings, as opposed to the elite coastal socialists the president imagines as the network’s sole demographic. That same day in New York, Trump got a large bonus. The Late Show’s Stephen Colbert, Trump’s most highly rated late-night comedy critic, was fired. Just three days earlier, Colbert had roasted his corporate bosses, CBS and its parent company, Paramount. Paramount had paid Trump $16 million to settle a lawsuit Trump filed against 60 Minutes while a deal for the Ellison family’s Skydance to buy Paramount hung in the balance at Trump’s Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Colbert quipped, “I believe this kind of complicated financial settlement with a sitting government official has a technical name in legal circles: It’s ‘big fat bribe!’”

Days later, Colbert got word that he was getting the axe: At the end of his present contract in May 2026, CBS will let him go. What’s more, network executives said that The Late Show itself, which David Letterman founded in 1993, would cease to exist. Last March, Bill Maher, a sometimes harsh critic of the president, flew out to Mar-a-Lago at the behest of Kid Rock to have dinner with Trump and bend the knee. Notably, Trump supporter David Zaslav’s WB Discovery properties, including CNN, have gotten off relatively lightly compared to ABC, CBS, NPR, and PBS in Trump’s media wars. Bill Maher still has a show. Stephen Colbert, who did not bend the knee, does not.

We still don’t know if CBS was pressured into firing Colbert or simply offered him up as a sacrifice to appease Trump’s FCC. Despite the timing, and the billion-dollar stakes around the Skydance deal, CBS executive George Cheeks denied that the move was political and insisted that the cancellation was “purely a financial decision.” Taking CBS at its word for the moment, Cheeks isn’t wrong. Late-night talk shows have struggled to turn a profit for their corporate owners for years. They remain expensive relics of a long-gone three-network broadcast world. When James Corden left The Late Late Show in 2023, which aired after Colbert’s, CBS canceled it, too. The network replaced it with a rebooted, cheaply produced comedy game show, After Midnight. Colbert’s ratings still run far ahead of his two chief rivals, ABC’s Jimmy Kimmel and NBC’s Jimmy Fallon, but late night’s ad revenues have steadily dropped for years. Seven years ago, late night cleared $439 million; last year, that total was cut in half, to $220 million. Meanwhile, over at Fox News, Greg Gutfeld’s late-night entry Gutfeld!, which goes on an hour earlier, manages competitive numbers with nothing but five people sitting on chairs guffawing at its host’s attempts to make the word “Nazi” fun.

While the financial free fall of late night is real, so is the precise political timing of the Colbert decision. CBS went to great lengths to avoid apologizing or admitting wrongdoing on behalf of 60 Minutes when it paid Trump his $16 million. If CBS wants to avoid embarrassing employees who did nothing wrong, why fire Colbert just days after his widely quoted comment? By calling his firing a “purely financial decision,” CBS executives want to give the impression that they were only following the balance sheets. They had to know their timing would look like more groveling. They could have waited another week. Why announce three days after Colbert attacked them and Trump? What’s the hurry?

The hurry is that Colbert called the payoff “a big fat bribe” on Monday, and Skydance’s David Ellison met with the FCC’s Brendan Carr on Tuesday. At the meeting, an FCC filing states that Ellison and his lawyer “discussed Skydance’s commitment to unbiased journalism and its embrace of diverse viewpoints, principles that will ensure CBS’s editorial decision-making reflects the varied ideological perspectives of American viewers.”

Current Issue

Cover of March 2026 Issue

Perhaps it’s just another incredible scheduling coincidence, but that promise of unbiased journalism came days after Ellison sat down at the Allen and Co. retreat in Sun Valley for early-acquisition talks with Bari Weiss for her archconservative site, The Free Press. As the media industry newsletter Puck asked: “Is it sound business or just savvy virtue signaling in a Trump 2.0 world?” One can ask the same question about firing Colbert. With only tea leaves to read for now, it sure looks like the Skydance media behemoth we’re about to get—with Larry Ellison, a longtime Trump supporter and Elon Musk Twitter investor hovering over it—will take a decidedly far-right tilt. And if it turns out anything at all like Ellison’s Twitter investment, it will also be a truly ugly tilt.

If Paramount thinks caving, paying up, and Trump-focused MAGA virtue signaling will help grease the wheels to put Skydance’s deal through, then Colbert’s firing produced an instant return on investment. Trump took to Truth Social Friday morning to crow his delight about CBS’s purely financial decision. “I absolutely love that Colbert’ got fired. His talent was even less than his ratings. I hear Jimmy Kimmel is next. Has even less talent than Colbert! Greg Gutfeld is better than all of them combined, including the Moron on NBC who ruined the once great Tonight Show.”

CBS—long known among industry watchers as “the Tiffany network”—has a long history of silencing talent with loud, liberal opinions. With Colbert’s firing, it was as if the network’s late founder, William S. Paley, had risen from the grave to haunt his old home. The best known example remains Paley’s canceling The Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour not only for its anti–Vietnam War and religiously themed satire but also for booking leftists like Harry Belafonte and Joan Baez. But CBS’s history of suppressing dissident views goes back further than that. In June 1939, another top-rated CBS comic, Eddie Cantor, appeared at the New York World’s Fair to address a Hadassah meeting of thousands. He used the moment to lash out against the rise of domestic fascism and antisemitism in the United States after 900 Jewish refugees from Hitler on the SS St. Louis were sent back to Europe by our immigration authorities. “Unless we are terribly careful, unless we fight for life and liberty, the whole business now going on over there can be transferred over here,” Cantor said. “Some people told me I seem to be getting pretty panicky. They don’t know what important industrialists are behind this business, behind Senator Reynolds and Father Coughlin and General Moseley and George Deatherage. These men are the enemies of not only the Jews but of all America.” Democratic Senator Robert Rice Reynolds came from North Carolina, as did Cantor’s sponsor at CBS, RJR Reynolds Tobacco. Cantor lost his show within two weeks.

The Nation Weekly

Fridays. A weekly digest of the best of our coverage.
By signing up, you confirm that you are over the age of 16 and agree to receive occasional promotional offers for programs that support The Nation’s journalism. You may unsubscribe or adjust your preferences at any time. You can read our Privacy Policy here.

George Clooney recently played CBS News correspondent Edward R. Murrow for the Broadway production based on his 2005 film Good Night, and Good Luck. After scoring a body blow against Senator Joseph McCarthy in 1954, the polarizing Murrow was exiled by Paley out of CBS’s prime-time lineup to sporadic appearances on Sunday afternoons. Clooney’s play tells the story of Murrow’s public demise as much as McCarthy’s.

In February 1982, the Screen Actors Guild president and star of CBS’s Lou Grant, Ed Asner, appeared on the steps of the State Department in Washington, DC. Asner stood alongside actors and filmmakers Howard Hesseman, Lee Grant, Penny Marshall, Bert Schneider, and Ralph “Pa Walton” Waite. He presented a check for $25,000 to “Medical Aid for El Salvador,” which went to the rebels who opposed the right-wing government backed by the Reagan administration. They hoped to raise $1 million in the future. A reporter asked Asner if he would support a communist government in El Salvador. He said yes, so long as that government was democratically elected. Lou Grant sponsors like Kimberly-Clark soon pulled out of the show. CBS canceled it in May. The company pointed to a drop in ratings, or a “purely a financial decision,” as we say now. Just more odd timing? As Asner said back then, “It allows the Jerry Falwells, the Kleenex people and the Caucus of Conservative consumers to think they can curb freedom of speech at will.”

And so it did, and so they still do today. Stephen Colbert now joins that list. It’s doubtful that Colbert will disappear. The Late Show may not make the network all the money it would like, but Colbert still commands an audience of millions. As the path to the White House goes increasingly through podcasts and YouTubers and non-network shows, Colbert can still remain a loud critic of Trump if he wants.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ben Schwartz

Ben Schwartz is an Emmy-nominated writer whose work has appeared in The New Yorker, Vanity Fair, The New Republic, The New York Times, and many other publications. His Bluesky address is @benschwartz.bluesky.social.

More from The Nation

Thousands are backed up and waiting to cross the Edmund Pettus Bridge to commemorate the 60th anniversary of the Bridge Crossing Jubilee and “Bloody Sunday” in Selma, Alabama, in 1965.

61 Years After Bloody Sunday, We Are Entering a New Era of Voter Suppression 61 Years After Bloody Sunday, We Are Entering a New Era of Voter Suppression

Two efforts underway threaten to erode the promise secured by the foot soldiers of Selma in 1965.

Janai Nelson

A banner featuring an image of US President Donald Trump with the slogan “Make America Safe Again” is displayed on the facade of the US Department of Justice headquarters in Washington, DC, on February 20.

The DOJ's Shameful Abuse of Power Must Be Reined In The DOJ's Shameful Abuse of Power Must Be Reined In

The weaponizing of the department to do Trump’s bidding
has dangerously undermined its credibility.

Michele Goodwin

The late Rev. Jesse Jackson.

In Memoriam: the Rev. Jesse Jackson (1941–2026) In Memoriam: the Rev. Jesse Jackson (1941–2026)

The civil-rights activist and founder of the Rainbow PUSH Coalition changed what’s possible in politics.

Obituary / John Nichols

A woman points a handgun with a laser sight on a wall display of other guns during the National Rifle Association convention in St. Louis.

The Real Reason Americans Love Guns The Real Reason Americans Love Guns

With a weak social safety net, a gun offers a false sense of personal power and security.

Beverly Gologorsky

Bari Weiss during her interview with Erika Kirk on December 13, 2025.

The Endless Hypocrisy of Bari Weiss The Endless Hypocrisy of Bari Weiss

She claims to be a free speech champion. But as her actions at CBS News keep showing, she seems to think free speech should run only in a rightward direction.

Grace Byron

Students gather at the Gregory Gym Plaza on UT-Austin's campus in a rally on February 16 to oppose the elimination of race, ethnic, and gender studies departments.

What Will Be Left After the University of Texas Destroys Itself? What Will Be Left After the University of Texas Destroys Itself?

UT-Austin has collapsed its race, ethnic, and gender studies into a single program while a new policy asks faculty to avoid “controversial” topics. But the attacks won’t end there...

StudentNation / Aaron Boehmer