I Dedicated My Life to the Labour Party. Keir Starmer’s Stance on Gaza Made Me Leave.
The first Arab Muslim woman on Manchester’s city council writes about why she resigned over the party leader’s endorsement of Israel’s humanitarian blockade.

Labour Party leader Keir Starmer on stage during the final day of the Labour Party conference on October 11, 2023, in Liverpool, England.
(Ian Forsyth / Getty Images)I have dedicated much of my life to the Labour Party over the last decade. In 2019, I was proudly elected as the first visibly Muslim, Arab-heritage woman to represent Manchester City Council.
Although my family has always been political, we certainly weren’t loyal to any particular party; my father felt that aligning yourself with one party was a way to lose your political power. But I’d managed to convince them not only to vote Labour but to join the party and support its campaigning activities.
I believed in Labour. Its values of justice and equality reflected my own, and I was committed to helping the party kick out the Conservatives, who have decimated this country through austerity, chaos, and corruption at the expense of regular working people for the last 13 years. Even when I didn’t agree with everything my party leaders did, I felt secure that we were all fundamentally on the same page.
But, in the weeks since the Israel-Gaza war has broken out, Labour leader Keir Starmer and some of his colleagues in the shadow cabinet have taken stances on the conflict that cross too many moral and ethical red lines for me. So it was with a heavy heart that on October 16, I made the decision to resign from the Labour Party.
I am not alone. There are now over 20 local politicians across the UK who have resigned their positions from the Labour Party because of Starmer’s actions in relation to the Israel-Palestine conflict.
The final straw for me was an October 11 radio interview in which Starmer was asked whether Israel’s right to defend itself extended to the siege of Gaza. Here is the exchange:
Interviewer: “A siege is appropriate? Cutting off power, cutting off water?”
Starmer: “I think Israel does have that right. It is an ongoing situation. Obviously everything should be done within international law.”
This stance was then backed up by Labour’s shadow attorney general, Emily Thornberry.
Starmer is a former human rights lawyer. He must know that collective punishment and the withholding of an occupied civilian population’s basic needs are contraventions of international humanitarian law. There was no gray area here.
Since then, Starmer has compounded his mistake. Rather than apologize, he said, over a week later, that he had only ever meant to imply that Israel has a right to defend itself. (This statement, with its implication that Starmer didn’t say what we all clearly heard him say, struck me and many of my former Labour colleagues as blatant gaslighting.) He went to a mosque in Wales to clean up the damage from his comments, only for the mosque to claim that he had “gravely misrepresented…the nature of the visit.” He held a meeting with Muslim MPs in which he reportedly refused to apologize for his comments and refused to back a cease-fire in Gaza.
These actions have not only caused deep upset and harm to many of us who believe in the humanity of all people, but much more than this, they are deeply irresponsible—and they are hurting our communities.
In the last two weeks, the UK has seen huge increases in both anti-Semitism and Islamophobia. In the US, a 6-year-old Palestinian Muslim child, Wadea Al-Fayoume, was stabbed to death. Mosques as well as synagogues have been targets of hate and abuse. Both Muslims and Jews have described feelings of anxiety and fear about their religious visibility.
Popular
“swipe left below to view more authors”Swipe →The death toll in Gaza has now topped 7,000; over 3,000 of the dead are children. There is no end in sight.
But rather than call for a cease-fire, politicians like Starmer are instead giving a green light to Israel to carry on, even though a YouGov survey last week found that 76 percent of the British public support an immediate cease-fire.
I never thought at any point in my life that we’d be in a situation where asking for a cease-fire and peace would be seen as controversial until now. The message is clear to Arabs, Palestinians, and Muslims as to how little the Conservative and Labour parties value their lives and their humanity.
I am clear on where I stand right now. So are my fellow former Labour members. We recognise and utterly condemn the atrocities committed by Hamas on Israelis, and we recognise and utterly condemn the atrocities committed by the Israeli government on Palestinians. We all have the ability to extend our humanity to all those deeply impacted by what is going on in the region.
But for me, the sense of being complicit by remaining in a party that is unable to call for an end to horrific human rights violations was too much.
I will continue to serve my local community until the end of my term as an independent politician, and I have been deeply humbled and grateful for the level of support I have received since my resignation.
Correction: This piece initially said that Abdullatif was the first Muslim woman to represent the Manchester City Council. In fact, she was the first visibly Muslim, Arab-heritage woman to do so.
Time is running out to have your gift matched
In this time of unrelenting, often unprecedented cruelty and lawlessness, I’m grateful for Nation readers like you.
So many of you have taken to the streets, organized in your neighborhood and with your union, and showed up at the ballot box to vote for progressive candidates. You’re proving that it is possible—to paraphrase the legendary Patti Smith—to redeem the work of the fools running our government.
And as we head into 2026, I promise that The Nation will fight like never before for justice, humanity, and dignity in these United States.
At a time when most news organizations are either cutting budgets or cozying up to Trump by bringing in right-wing propagandists, The Nation’s writers, editors, copy editors, fact-checkers, and illustrators confront head-on the administration’s deadly abuses of power, blatant corruption, and deconstruction of both government and civil society.
We couldn’t do this crucial work without you.
Through the end of the year, a generous donor is matching all donations to The Nation’s independent journalism up to $75,000. But the end of the year is now only days away.
Time is running out to have your gift doubled. Don’t wait—donate now to ensure that our newsroom has the full $150,000 to start the new year.
Another world really is possible. Together, we can and will win it!
Love and Solidarity,
John Nichols
Executive Editor, The Nation
More from The Nation
Brace Yourselves for Trump’s New Monroe Doctrine Brace Yourselves for Trump’s New Monroe Doctrine
Trump's latest exploits in Latin America are just the latest expression of a bloody ideological project to entrench US power and protect the profits of Western multinationals.
Chile at the Crossroads Chile at the Crossroads
A dramatic shift to the extreme right threatens the future—and past—for human rights and accountability.
The New Europeans, Trump-Style The New Europeans, Trump-Style
Donald Trump is sowing division in the European Union, even as he calls on it to spend more on defense.
The United States’ Hidden History of Regime Change—Revisited The United States’ Hidden History of Regime Change—Revisited
The truculent trio—Trump, Hegseth, and Rubio—do Venezuela.
Mahmood Mamdani’s Uganda Mahmood Mamdani’s Uganda
In his new book Slow Poison, the accomplished anthropologist revisits the Idi Amin and Yoweri Museveni years.
The US Is Looking More Like Putin’s Russia Every Day The US Is Looking More Like Putin’s Russia Every Day
We may already be on a superhighway to the sort of class- and race-stratified autocracy that it took Russia so many years to become after the Soviet Union collapsed.
