Why Lance Armstrong Will Survive ’60 Minutes’ and the Feds

Why Lance Armstrong Will Survive ’60 Minutes’ and the Feds

Why Lance Armstrong Will Survive ’60 Minutes’ and the Feds

Three teammates have testified they saw the great cyclist take performance enhancing drugs. But Armstrong’s supporters aren’t going anywhere.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Seven-time Tour de France winner Lance Armstrong is now facing the systematic disemboweling of his legacy as an athletic icon. As revealed Sunday on 60 Minutes—a show that usually doesn’t do sports features unless there’s a synergistic tie-in with CBS Sports—three of Armstrong’s teammates have testified to a federal grand jury that they saw the great cyclist take performance-enhancing drugs. Armstrong’s top “lieutenant” Tyler Hamilton said, “He took what we all took…. There was EPO, there was testosterone. And I did see a transfusion, a blood transfusion.”

60 Minutes also broke the news that George Hincapie, Armstrong’s closest friend and teammate, finally relented and testified to federal investigators. According to reporter Scott Pelley, Hincapie stated “that he and Armstrong supplied each other with the blood-booster EPO and discussed having used testosterone—another banned substance during their preparation for races.” Hincapie is apparently shocked that his confidential grand jury testimony was leaked. He released a statement through his attorney where he said, “I can confirm to you that I never spoke with 60 Minutes. I have no idea where they got their information.” (Hincapie will be releasing his LiveNaïve rubber bracelets later this month.)

For what it’s worth, I find these federal grand juries aimed at “cleaning up sports,” a vulgar use of government power. In cycling, it’s particularly noxious. This is a sport that desperately needs organization and labor protections. Cyclists are pushed to extend their bodies beyond all possible human limits. Since 2000, twelvec professional cyclists have died during races. Imagine the outcry if twelve NFL players had died on the field during the same time span. Blood doping is a logical outcome of a sport where people push themselves to death for the enjoyment of fans and benefit of sponsors. Of the seventy top ten finishers in Armstrong’s seven Tour De France victories, forty-one have tested positive for PEDS. That’s what happens when there is no legitimate union, commissioner, or controlling authority other than race organizers and sponsors—and highly competitive athletes pushing themselves at all costs to make it through the Pyrenees in one piece.

As for Armstrong, he has come out swinging with his typically furious denials, saying, “CBS’s reporting on this subject has been replete with broken promises, false assurances and selective reliance on witnesses upon whom no reputable journalist would rely.” Armstrong has long insisted on his innocence and touted his reputation as “the most tested athlete on the planet.” Clearly he and the media believe his reputation as an athletic icon—like that of baseball greats Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens—is hanging by the thread. But unlike other athletes, Armstrong’s legacy is secure. That’s because his support comes from a far less fickle place than fandom.

In Robert Lipsyte’s recently released memoir An Accidental Sportswriter, the great columnist reveals that the only modern athlete who send his pulse racing is Armstrong. “He’s the closest thing I have to a celebrity jock hero,” says Lipsyte. This is a remarkable statement from a writer who is a great critic of that nexus of sports, media and hero-worship that he brands “jock-sniffing.”

But his affection for Armstrong transcends cycling. Bob Lipsyte is a cancer survivor. Like many cancer survivors, he sees Armstrong as more than an icon of athletics, as an icon of survival and recovery.

Lipsyte’s love was cemented when he heard someone ask Armstrong how his belief in God helped him beat cancer and Armstrong responded, “Everyone should believe in something, and I believe in surgery, chemotherapy, and my doctors.” Armstrong also believes that everyone should have access to the kind of medicine that allowed him to beat death. He’s helped raise, through his LiveStrong foundation with its ubiquitous yellow bracelets, more than $400 million dollars for medical research. This is why Armstrong doesn’t just have defenders. He has, in the legions of cancer survivors across our toxic nation, an army. The Associated Press quoted cancer survivor and amateur cyclist Raifie Bass, who said, “Lance is a true inspiration for so many people. He’s just a person that really is a great motivator for me as a cyclist and as a cancer survivor. What Lance has done for the global message of cancer and awareness, it’s unstoppable.… it’s not how many Tours he won or what he’s done for cycling. It’s what he’s done for cancer.”

What a country. We have a federal government spending untold amounts to “clean up” performance enhancing drugs in cycling, targeting someone whose celebrity and efforts are critical in the fight against cancer. How about we close down the grand jury and in return, cycling agrees to get a commissioner, a union and a method to handle its own drug testing? How about we take the money being spent to find out what someone might have taken to survive these torturous races, and donate it to cancer research? I’m sure federal prosecutors have other people’s garbage to sift through, and 60 Minutes could then be free to finish its hard-hitting story about what makes Roger Goodell so dreamy. But however this ends, I wouldn’t bet against Lance Armstrong. The LiveStrong Army is bonded by something stronger than sports… and stronger than the Feds.

Like this blog post? Read it on The Nation’s free iPhone App, NationNow.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x