What’s Missing From the Chicago Strike Debate

What’s Missing From the Chicago Strike Debate

What’s Missing From the Chicago Strike Debate

As Obama touts his education reforms and neoliberals face off with teachers, hardly anyone is talking about the real problems besetting America’s public schools.


Thousands of public school teachers march on streets surrounding the Chicago Public Schools district headquarters on the first day of strike action over teachers’ contracts on Monday, September 10, 2012, in Chicago. For the first time in a quarter-century, Chicago teachers walked out of the classroom Monday, taking a bitter contract dispute over evaluations and job security to the streets of the nation’s third-largest city—and to a national audience—less than a week after most schools opened for fall. (AP Photo/Sitthixay Ditthavong)

Even though the Chicago teachers’ strike is now settled, the issues it raised will not go away anytime soon. Many of the reforms the teachers oppose—expanding charter schools, using test scores to evaluate teachers, closing “failing” schools—were introduced by then–Chicago Schools CEO Arne Duncan, now President Obama’s education secretary. In fact, these measures have largely been incorporated into federal policy under Obama’s Race to the Top (RTT) initiative.

Obama frequently touts RTT on the campaign trail along with what he regards as his administration’s other signal accomplishments in education policy: national common core standards adopted by forty-six states, the provisionally enacted Dream Act and more. The president has raised education as a campaign issue because he knows the American people are deeply concerned about it. The cutbacks in the wake of the recession have taken a heavy toll on schools. Thousands of teachers and other personnel have been laid off, class sizes have increased and critical programs—kindergarten, music, art, after-school programs, etc.—have been slashed or even eliminated.

Obama deserves credit for allowing states to use stimulus funds to offset some of the effects of austerity, saving more than 400,000 jobs in education. However, his education policy has all along had two major weaknesses: his stance toward teachers and his unwillingness to acknowledge that the biggest challenge confronting public schools is poverty. What has happened in Chicago exemplifies those weaknesses.

The district has been undergoing reforms consistent with Obama’s accountability agenda for several years now. But only 45 percent of Chicago public school students meet or exceed the Illinois learning standards. The city’s schools have some of the highest dropout rates in the nation. In 2011–12, of the 598 schools in the system, 443 did not achieve Average Yearly Progress for the second consecutive year.

Clearly, something is not working in Chicago. It’s not just the reform agenda that’s at fault: the schools have been failing for a long time. Mayor Rahm Emanuel may be a bully and a threat to public education—and his remedies the wrong ones—but the call for change can’t be denied.

The teachers have been bold in their denunciation of the high-stakes testing that has been used to rank students, schools and now teachers. But they have been less clear about what should be done to promote change and improvement. The union has raised the critical issue of student poverty by calling for more social workers and school-based clinics, but it has not acknowledged that more learning time and a clear and fair basis for judging teacher effectiveness are issues that must be addressed.

President Obama, the teachers unions and all the other reformers out there would do well to focus more attention on the three huge interrelated issues that pose the biggest challenge to public education and to American society. These are complex issues that will not be resolved by any union contract settlement—but they cannot be avoided if we are to fix what ails our public schools. The big three are:

§Youth poverty. Since 2008, poverty rates for children have soared. Nationally, one child in four comes from a family below the poverty line, and one in five lives in a state of food emergency. Increasingly, public schools are all that remains of the safety net for poor children, and with funding for education being cut back, the safety net is falling apart.

§Changing demographics. In nine states, the majority of school-age children are from minority backgrounds. Because of higher birth rates among Latinos, the number of states with majority minority populations will steadily increase even if the influx of immigrants continues to slow. As the ethnic composition of student populations changes, it is harder to obtain public support for school funding. Voters don’t seem to understand that today’s children will be responsible for supporting an aging, largely white population during its retirement years. Economists project that it takes at least three workers to support one retiree on Social Security. Since 2010 we have fallen below that threshold. Will a less educated, poorer, multiracial workforce be willing or able to take care of an aging white population?

§Growing segregation. According to UCLA’s Civil Rights Project, two in every five African-American and Latino students attend highly segregated schools. Schools are more segregated today than they were forty years ago. The pattern is most severe in Western states, including California—not in the South, as many people believe—and most nonwhite schools are segregated by poverty as well. Dropout rates and failure tend to be highest in the schools of poor children. How will the next generation of young people be prepared to solve the problems they inherit?

The Chicago teachers deserve credit for challenging the neoliberal reforms and the drive toward privatization that have been promoted by Mayor Emanuel, Secretary Duncan and, to some extent, President Obama. However, shutting down a school system where the overwhelming majority of students are poor, black and Latino without offering a vision for comprehensive change is not sufficient. Parents have called for a seat at the negotiating table. Perhaps that will be what it takes to create schools that are accountable to those they serve.

Also in this issue, Melissa Harris-Perry reveals the “Casualties in the Education Reform Wars.” In our special Occupy the Safety Net issue earlier this year, Pedro Noguera wrote about the struggles of a West Oakland school, hit by the double whammies of poverty and austerity.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy