Trump Is No “President of Peace”
He’s spoiling for war.
President Trump’s recent decision to rename the Pentagon the War Department was applauded by at least some analysts across the political system. Experts and spokespersons on the left praised the change as truth in advertising. Probably so, but it is cold comfort when the author of that decision seems to want to wage war on us—and in fact is already doing so.
Despite Trump’s actual record, every once in a while, some pundit or think-tank analyst suggests that if Donald Trump’s true instincts were to kick in, he could become our unlikeliest “President of Peace.” Some suggest that it is the case because, after all, he desperately wants to get the Nobel Peace Prize.
Others say Trump will change course and get on the path to peace because he has no fixed ideology, unlike the neocon faction among the Never Trumpers—the men and women who brought you the war in Iraq, which Trump trashed relentlessly in his 2016 presidential campaign.
Furthermore, Trump is transactional. He likes to make deals, and he is willing to talk to the only people who can deliver a deal in many cases—US adversaries like Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong Un. Recent Democratic presidents have refused to do this, and as a result they were flying blind in any efforts to resolve a conflict, simply because they didn’t know enough about the other side’s concerns or red lines.
But Trump the potential conciliator and master dealmaker has done many things that suggest that he has no real interest in pursuing peace. His interest in helping end the war in Ukraine has more to do with freeing up resources for arms racing with China and further militarizing the US-Mexico border. And his administration’s new National Defense Strategy talks as much about combating the enemy within as it does about the risks posed by China’s economic and military rise.
Add to that the bombing of Iran, the killing of alleged Venezuelan drug dealers without due process or congressional approval, the continuation of the Biden policy of funding and enabling Israel’s brutal attacks on Gaza, which many experts consider to be genocide. And don’t forget the routine practice of masked ICE agents grabbing people off the streets, or even in their homes, and sending them to detention centers in the US or horrific prisons in El Salvador.
Alongside all the above, President Trump’s claims that his administration is somehow pursuing “deep cuts” in Pentagon spending in the name of “efficiency.” Yet the proposed budget for next year—bolstered by additions contained in the misnamed Big Beautiful Bill, will exceed $1 trillion for the first time. It is well above levels reached at the height of the Cold War or the peak of the Vietnam conflict once they are adjusted for inflation.
The pushback against the militarization of our society and the massive transfer of funds to the war machine has not been strong enough to make a difference—yet. But if the victims of the flurry of executive orders emanating from the White House get together and fight back—joined by people whose lives and livelihoods are threatened by the big ugly bill—an effective resistance movement can be built.
So we have a lot of work to do—on ourselves, among our organizations, and by some of the institutions that have so far bent the knee to the Trump administration. But we have no choice but to fight back, and whatever the odds, I think we can turn back the tide of hatred and division.
Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation
Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.
We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.
In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen.
Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering.
With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now.
While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account.
I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.
Onward,
Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and publisher, The Nation
