December 6, 2024

Macronism Has Died a Second Death

 
The French parliament votes to oust the government.

Harrison Stetler
French President Emmanuel Macron and Prime Minister Michel Barnier stand at attention during commemorations marking the 106th anniversary of the armistice ending World War I on November 11, 2024.(Photo by Ludovic Marin / Pool / AFP via Getty Images)

Macronism has died its second death. On December 4, France’s National Assembly overwhelmingly approved a no-confidence vote against Prime Minister Michel Barnier, now the shortest-serving head of government under the Fifth Republic. When President Emmanuel Macron appointed the 73-year-old former Brexit negotiator to the post in September, it was a long-shot bid to retain control of government. The premier’s main task was to secure a 2025 budget that would safeguard the president’s pro-business agenda while charting a path for severe deficit reduction in the face of mounting concerns over French state finances.

But the votes just weren’t there. Leading a minority coalition tying parliamentary Macronists to Barnier’s center-right Républicains, the prime minister could count on the support of barely more than 200 MPs in the lower house (289 votes are needed for a majority). Even that “common foundation,” as surrogates and the press coined the rickety Macronist-Républicains alliance, proved weak from the start. Since the government was formed, the parties in the coalition and their leadership have been prone to infighting and competitive posturing.

With the math against him, Barnier had little choice but to throw down the gauntlet on December 2, when he announced he would use a special constitutional provision to force a social security financing bill through parliament without a vote from the National Assembly. By invoking “49.3,” Barnier exposed his government to a no-confidence motion, immediately submitted by the left-wing Nouveau Front Populaire (NFP). The votes of 331 MPs—mostly from the left and Marine Le Pen’s far-right Rassemblement National (RN)—were more than enough to block Barnier and oust the prime minister from power. In parliament, Macron is running out of gas.

The same goes for the president’s standing with the broader public. Barnier’s fall marks the latest turn in a political crisis that began in early June, when Macron took the country by surprise by dissolving the National Assembly. The snap elections that followed fractured the lower house into thirds and revealed broad-based rejection of Macron’s technocratic centrism. Once viewed as front-runners in that campaign, Le Pen and her far-right allies finished with 142 seats in the National Assembly. The NFP eked out a first-place finish with 193 seats thanks to tactical voting in runoffs by moderates and left-wingers seeking to block Le Pen’s party from power. Meanwhile, Macron’s centrist alliance withered to a mere 166 seats, down from the 250 it held in the prior parliament.

Barnier’s tenure provided a short reprieve for the president, who still finds himself at record lows in popularity ratings. According to a November opinion study, 76 percent of the public disapprove of Macron’s handling of the presidency. As Barnier’s budget bill made it through the National Assembly, a majority believed opposition parties should vote to sink the government. “My decision to dissolve the National Assembly was not understood,” Macron said in a televised address on Thursday evening, in a rare admission from a chronically self-assured president.

True to form, Macron passed most of the blame on to the opposition. “[Barnier] was censured—something that has been unheard of for 60 years—because the extreme right and the extreme left united in an anti-republican front and because forces that used to govern France decided to help them,” Macron continued. The president is expected to name a new prime minister in the coming days, holding a series of meetings with figures from the center-left Parti Socialiste, his centrist bloc, and the Républicains.

Barnier’s government failed when the primary conceit propping it up gave way: the good graces of Le Pen. Designed above all to block the NFP from power, Barnier’s only other possible crutch was the far right. Since September, the Rassemblement National has basked in this kingmaker role. “Whatever happens, we’re the ones who decide,” Jordan Bardella, the RN’s official president, boasted this fall.

Barnier bent over backward to coax and appease the RN. He appointed staunch conservatives to his cabinet to anchor his government on terms possibly amenable to Le Pen, including the ultraconservative Bruno Retailleau as interior minister. Barnier promised to consider reforms to France’s legislative election system long demanded by the far right and prepared another stringent anti-immigration package for early 2025. When Macronist Finance Minister Antoine Armand suggested in late September that he would not speak with Le Pen and the RN during budget drafting, Barnier reprimanded him and called Le Pen to apologize.

To grease the wheels of their rapprochement, the parties of the “common foundation” moved closer to Le Pen on immigration, while the Rassemblement National shifted toward a more traditional conservative stance on economic policy. However, the risk of tying the RN’s fate too closely to an unpopular government ultimately prompted Le Pen to pull down the curtain, if only as a show of strength.

For her part, Le Pen may now tack back to a more compromising position. She said after the vote that her party was open to “letting [a future government] get to work” and would eagerly “co-construct” a new budget. In recent days, Le Pen’s caucus was reportedly instructed not to excessively celebrate Barnier’s fall.

The Nation Weekly

Fridays. A weekly digest of the best of our coverage.
By signing up, you confirm that you are over the age of 16 and agree to receive occasional promotional offers for programs that support The Nation’s journalism. You may unsubscribe or adjust your preferences at any time. You can read our Privacy Policy here.

The collapse of Barnier’s government also highlights tensions within the NFP alliance. The centrist wing of the NFP, particularly the Parti Socialiste, has expressed willingness to form a “no-censure” pact with the Macronists. However, such a move is a non-starter for La France Insoumise, the alliance’s largest party, which has pledged to break with Macron’s policies and repeal reforms like the retirement age increase.

Macron now faces the unenviable task of appointing a new prime minister. While figures like independent centrist François Bayrou could fracture the NFP alliance, others, like the Républicains’ Retailleau or Macron’s defense minister, Sébastien Lecornu, might better appease Le Pen.

Whoever emerges as Barnier’s successor, it seems unlikely that any personnel change can salvage Macron’s political project.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Harrison Stetler

Harrison Stetler is a freelance journalist based in Paris.

More from The Nation

Idi Amin in Kampala, 1975.

Mahmood Mamdani’s Uganda Mahmood Mamdani’s Uganda

In his new book Slow Poison, the accomplished anthropologist revisits the Idi Amin and Yoweri Museveni years.

Books & the Arts / Howard W. French

Trump and Putin walk side-by-side silhouetted

The US Is Looking More Like Putin’s Russia Every Day The US Is Looking More Like Putin’s Russia Every Day

We may already be on a superhighway to the sort of class- and race-stratified autocracy that it took Russia so many years to become after the Soviet Union collapsed.

Andrea Mazzarino

Hend’s family during their olive harvest season in 2024. Photo courtesy of Hend Salama Abo Helow

Israel Wants to Destroy My Family's Way of Life. We'll Never Give In. Israel Wants to Destroy My Family's Way of Life. We'll Never Give In.

My family's olive trees have stood in Gaza for decades. Despite genocide, drought, pollution, toxic mines, uprooting, bulldozing, and burning, they're still here—and so are we.

Hend Salama Abo Helow

Trump Foreign Policy

Trump’s National Security Strategy and the Big Con Trump’s National Security Strategy and the Big Con

Sense, nonsense, and lunacy.

Robert L. Borosage

Sunset over Christ the Saviour cathedral in Moscow

Does Russian Feminism Have a Future? Does Russian Feminism Have a Future?

A Russian feminist reflects on Julia Ioffe’s history of modern Russia.

Nadezhda Azhgikhina

Oleksandr Ibrahimov, 56, a security guard working for 35 years at the House of Trade Unions, finds a sunflower growing amidst wreckage.

Ukraine’s War on Its Unions Ukraine’s War on Its Unions

Since the start of the war, the Ukrainian government has been cracking down harder on unions and workers’ rights. But slowly, the public mood is shifting.

David Zauner