Is There a Chechen Connection to the Boston Bombings?

Is There a Chechen Connection to the Boston Bombings?

Is There a Chechen Connection to the Boston Bombings?

It appears the Tsarnaev brothers were self-motivated. But their Salafist extremism was itself one outgrowth of the brutal Chechen wars of independence against Russia.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket


Courtesy: FBI

Bozeman

When a local newspaper here in Montana called for my views on a 19-year-old wrestler named Dzhokhar Tsarnaev with the confusing pedigree of being a Chechen from Dagestan who was reportedly born in Kyrgyzstan but mostly grew up in the United States, and what his motivations for the Boston Marathon terror attack may have been, I tried to use my background as the resident “Chechenologist” to help out.

Answering the second part of the
question—“Why?”—was easy: I did not know Tsarnaev’s motivations. But if he is guilty of the bombings—and I have little doubt at this point that he is—there must be a link to the deeply troubled history of Chechnya, and to the generations of anger, despair and trauma experienced by his people.

To start: Chechens are not Russians but a distinct national and lingual group, known as the Nakhs or Vainakhs, who are indigenous to the north slope of the Caucasus mountain range, where they have lived since before recorded history. Rather like Native American peoples, whose sad history is a strange and cruel mirror of the Chechens’ experience at the hands of Russian imperialism, the people of Chechnya do not call themselves “Chechens.” In their own language—as distinct from Russian as Navajo is from English—they are the Noxchi, which translates more or less as “the People.”

During the Murid wars of the nineteenth century, the Chechens were the backbone of Muslim tribal resistance to czarist expansion, earning their reputation as fearless Sufi-inspired warriors. After the resistance collapsed with the capture of Imam Shamil (an event somewhat akin to the surrender of Sioux/Lakota chief Sitting Bull), many of those warriors took their skills into exile, serving the Ottoman Empire in problematic border areas such as the Balkans and the Arab lands of the Levant, where they became known under the generic name Circassians, a term that includes related North Caucasus mountaineers such as the Ingush, Abkhaz and Adyghe, who were also driven into exile by the czars.

The ceremonial guard of Jordan’s king are Circassians; in Syria, they are (or were) concentrated in the Golan Heights but are now attempting a reverse migration to their ancestral lands in Russia, even while undetermined numbers of their “cousins” from Chechnya-in-Russia take up arms alongside jihadists against the secular Syrian regime of Bashar al-Assad.

In the 1920s and ’30s, the Chechens maintained a low-boil resistance to Soviet rule and collectivization. But it was also thanks to Joseph Stalin and his commissars that Chechnya was first defined as an “autonomous republic,” a territorial entity replete with borders, an official “culture” and other Soviet-style attributes of statehood.

Many other marginal peoples in the USSR did not fare so well, and were thus absorbed into larger, non-Slavic nutshells whenever Stalin sneezed. For the Chechens, that sneeze came in February 1944, when Stalin and his fellow Georgian henchman Lavrenti Beria accused the Chechens of collaborating with the Nazis, dissolved their autonomous republic, and sent the new nonpeople into exile in Siberia and Soviet Central Asia. They were transported in boxcars chillingly similar to those that brought Jews to Hitler’s death camps. In the case of the
Chechens, roughly half of the exactly 478,479 who were exiled died en route. The Vysl, or Deportation, became the defining event in Chechen collective memory, as resonant as the Trail of Tears for the Cherokees, the Retreat of the Nez Percé or the Holocaust of Europe’s Jews.

In the gulags and collective farms of Central Asian exile (mostly Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan), the Chechens honed their reputation for toughness. Some remain in Kyrgyzstan to this day, having chosen not to return to their homeland after their rehabilitation by Nikita Khrushchev in 1957. Those who did return to Chechnya did so with a collective bad attitude as well as a reputation for ruthlessness and organized crime.

Paradoxically, the Chechens also excelled in the Soviet security services: reminiscent of American Indians in the US armed forces, a disproportionately high percentage of 
Chechens rose to officer and even general rank in the Red Army, the police and the KGB. Dzhokhar Dudayev achieved the rank of major general in the Soviet Air Force, commanding a squadron of nuclear bombers in anticipation of World
War III. (“Dzhokhar” is not—or was not until recently—a common first name among Chechens, and it seems fairly clear to me that the younger Tsarnaev was named after the now nearly legendary Chechen nationalist leader as opposed to being given a more familiar Islam-based name like Muhammad, Ahmad or Isa. So, the family seems to be part of the secular wing of traditional Chechen society, as opposed to the overtly religious part.)

It was General Dudayev who led Chechnya’s break with Russia in 1991, when the USSR collapsed. He didn’t so much declare independence as announce that Chechnya had never been part of Russia. This attitude—and the fact that Grozny, Chechnya’s capital, had become synonymous with organized crime—
tempted Russian President Boris Yeltsin to “restore constitutional order” over the wayward, self-described Chechen Republic of
Ichkeria in 1994, a military adventure that was also intended to serve as a distraction from serious problems in Moscow.

But what was supposed to have been a small victorious war did not go well for the Russians. After the loss of some 90,000 lives, most of them Chechen, and the destruction of virtually all of Chechnya’s infrastructure, Moscow had to sign a humiliating cease-fire in 1996. The carnage was truly mind-boggling and begs comparison now to battlegrounds like Syria. I covered the Chechen conflict as a journalist for various Western media outlets, and while I went to Grozny, I spent most of my time in the small farm town of Samashki, which was subjected to a full-frontal blitz by Russian tanks and attack helicopters that killed at least 130 in a single day: April 7, 1995. The town was virtually razed once again, in March 1996. The PBS program Rights and Wrongs broadcast my material on the carnage as the “Samashki Massacre.” This led to the BBC asking me to do a follow-up on the aftermath that aired internationally in 1998, by which time I had come down with a bad case of PTSD. I do not know of a single observer of either of the Chechen wars—much less a participant—who was not scarred to his or her soul by the experience.

General Dudayev did not survive the first war. In murky circumstances, he was blasted into collective memory by what is believed to have been a laser-guided missile homing in on his satellite telephone as he waited to speak with an (allegedly) American interlocutor working on a peace deal. True or not, to this day, many Chechens are firmly convinced of a US connection to the assassination. Even more galling was President Bill Clinton’s description at the time of the brutal Russo-Chechen war as somehow akin to the American Civil War. Then came the nearly suicidal capture of Grozny by the Chechen resistance in August 1996, which forced Yeltsin to the negotiating table.

Despite its David versus Goliath victory over the Russian Bear, things did not go well for “independent” Chechnya.
With Dudayev’s death, the tiny quasi-country slowly descended into lawlessness as well as an Islamist revival, thanks to the presence of Al Qaeda–connected fighters from the Arab world (many of whom had fought in Afghanistan), as well as even darker forces that many attribute to the KGB, now renamed the FSB. One result was the opening of an immense fissure in postwar Chechen society: on one side were the nationalists, who practiced a traditional form of Sufi Islam; on the other were growing numbers of Chechens whose devotion to the concept of an Al Qaeda–style Muslim caliphate superseded their loyalty to the Chechen nation-state itself.

It was a very confusing time.

In 1999, when these Salafists began exporting their fundamentalist ideology to the neighboring (Russian) Autonomous Republic of Dagestan, and then (allegedly) blew up a series of apartment buildings in Russian cities, Yeltsin’s prime minister (and then replacement president) Vladimir Putin launched the so-called “second” Russo-Chechen war, which arguably continues to this day.

Putin was assisted in this task by major Chechen defections, which further divided Chechen society into at least three groups: the Dudayevist nationalists, who continue their guerrilla war from forest hideouts in upper Chechnya; pro-Russian collaborators, known as Kadyrovists, currently in control of the Russian-backed government in Grozny, who participated on the Russian side during the brief war between Russia and Georgia in August 2008; and the Al Qaeda–associated Salafists, whose war has expanded from the Caucasus region to Afghanistan, Iraq and now Syria. Of note here should be the confused division/union between the Dudayevists and Salafists, both opposed to the Kadyrovists, whose utter brutality in the service of Moscow has arguably brought blighted Chechnya more real independence than anything Soviet Major General Dudayev delivered to his country by proclaiming titular independence.

Much of the fighting has now shifted to neighboring Dagestan, the wild, mountainous sub-republic in Russia immediately to the east of Chechnya, where every valley seems to contain a different ethnic and linguistic group, and where the Caucasus Emirate holds sway (at least at night) over swaths of hardscrabble territory. Notably, the emir, or Commander of the Faithful, one Doku Umarov, has rejected any and all connection to the
Tsarnaev brothers, declaring that the emirate’s jihad is against Russia, not the United States.

Finally, there is what we might call the Chechen “fourth estate,” people so battered by the wickedness of fate that they left their homeland as refugees to start “normal” lives elsewhere—like Boston. According to reports from friends and family, this is the group to which the Tsarnaev family belonged—or appeared to until recently.

At the very least, it seems clear that Dzhokhar’s older brother, Tamerlan, and perhaps Dzhokhar too, identified with extremist Islamists, as opposed to the strangely and sadly divided Chechen nationalists associated with Dudayev, the ill-fated first president of that equally ill-fated post-Soviet republic. I guess it will all come out as Dzhokhar is interrogated and tried; now my suspicion lies with the brothers having abandoned their compatriots’ weird and horrible 200-year-old resistance against Russia to embrace the Salafist line of global jihad against the United States.

Myself, I am filled with an immense sadness for all involved: the dead and the maimed runners and spectators of the
Boston Marathon, as well as the soul-scarred citizens of the blighted state of Chechnya.

Chechnya was the subject of a 2003 Nation article by Matt Bivens, who wrote about Putin's treatment of Russo-Chechen War refugees.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x