How Rebecca Solnit Became ‘the Voice of the Resistance’

How Rebecca Solnit Became ‘the Voice of the Resistance’

How Rebecca Solnit Became ‘the Voice of the Resistance’

She has focused for many years on cruel systems that oppress the working class, people of color, and women.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

When the commander in chief debases the discourse with Twitter storms, and most of the media debases itself by imagining that the narrative of our times can be spelled out in 140 (or even 280) characters, it is easy to imagine that actual thinking has ceased. Then you read an essay or, better yet, pick up a book by Rebecca Solnit, and everything starts to make sense. Yes, these are maddening times, but there are explanations for how America went awry, and bold, smart strategies for how to rediscover the better angels of our nature.

Solnit anticipated 2017 with a canon that has long reflected on resistance—not merely to authoritarian leaders, but to the cruel systems of politics and commerce that weigh so heavily against people of color, the working class, and women. Her recent books Men Explain Things to Me and The Mother of All Questions inspired headlines like “Meet Rebecca Solnit, the woman who predicted #MeToo” (in Britain’s Telegraph), just as her essays on resisting Trump (and the resurgence of interest in her 2004 book Hope in the Dark) led The New York Times to dub Solnit “the Voice of the Resistance.”

As the first year of Trump’s presidency evolved, it turned out that millions of Americans shared her rebellious sensibility. I asked Solnit if she had anticipated the level of resistance. “I did not,” she replied. “I remember how opposing the post-9/11 Bush administration felt lonely, dangerous, and out of step with the majority, and I dreaded another wave of blind, fearful obedience in the wake of the cataclysmic election in which anyone who resisted might stick out as a target. I mean, I was going to stick it out if that’s how it was going to be, but I was worried. On the eighth day after the election, I decided it was time to act on the evidence that the election had been illegitimate for many reasons and that Trump was quite likely colluding with a foreign power to win. At that point, there was a lot of stunned silence and psychic prostration. But wonderful people quickly began organizing around trying to convince the Electoral College to reject Trump, and resistance mushroomed, until by the day after the inauguration, the day of the Women’s Marches all over the country, it was everywhere.”

Looking ahead to Trump’s second year in office, “the Voice of the Resistance” proposes… more resistance. “I think we need more dramatic action, and I’m hoping people are ready to flood the streets if and when the time comes, but also to recognize how, incrementally, everything most decent about the federal government is being dismantled,” Solnit said. “I know that I don’t know what will happen next, and that means not only what the administration does but how civil society pushes back. We’ve never had more uncertainty about what happens next. And the possibility that, this time around, we are the big backlash is there.”

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x