Gore’s Surrender

Gore’s Surrender

Less than a hour after George Bush concluded his party’s have-a-nice-election convention with a vapid but beyond-the-expectations acceptance speech, a source deep within the Gore camp called me


Less than a hour after George Bush concluded his party’s have-a-nice-election convention with a vapid but beyond-the-expectations acceptance speech, a source deep within the Gore camp called me. This person had already conferred with several Gore-ites, and each had expressed the same sentiment: “Oh shit. What do we do now?” Bush and the Republicans had succeeded in staging an r&b-scored, feel-good revue that transfused Bush’s own affability into his campaign and party, that defined the election as a contest mostly of personality and character (with Bush oddly cast as the morally upright grown-up sadly disappointed with Clinton and Gore because of you-know-what), and that rendered the now smirk-free Bush into presidential material presiding over a united party that has reined in its more extreme elements.

The ease and cunning with which the Bush campaign distanced itself–in sights and sound–from the Party of Newt was frightening for Democrats. No calls for culture wars. No shrill attacks. No demands for dramatic downsizing of the federal government. No bowing to the religious right or the gun nuts. No mention of the impeachment jihad. None of the harsh stuff Democrats have desperately relied on in recent years. After all, who needs policies when you can satanize Gingrich and cry out, “The religious right is coming”? For their part, Bush and Dick Cheney did champion a few policy ideas–privatizing Social Security, implementing sweeping tax cuts, instituting school vouchers–but the thrust of both of their speeches was that Gore should be booted to avenge the honor of the Oval Office.

In other words, this election is about a stain.

Rather than challenge that proposition, Gore confirmed it when he selected Senator Joe Lieberman, the “New Democrat” from Connecticut, to be his running mate. After watching the GOPers try to establish the race as a competition of standards and character, Gore elected not to fight back with issues. Instead, he handcuffed himself to a probity stand-in, a socially conservative Orthodox Jew who prominently scolded Bill Clinton for his pseudo-sex scandal. Gore’s response to the Republicans’ collective tsk-tsk over Clinton: Yes, this is about a stain, but I have my own personal delouser.

But placing a dry cleaner on the ticket only calls attention to the mess. It doesn’t compensate–or change the topic. Moreover, Lieberman’s brand of cleaning fluid ruins as much material as it destains. Lieberman, who chairs the corporate-funded, right-leaning Democratic Leadership Council, flirted with partial privatization of Social Security and experimenting with school vouchers–ideas promoted by Bush and attacked by Gore as risky schemes. With Lieberman by his side, Gore can no longer slam Bush on these crucial fronts. He’s traded ammunition for cover. During the Republican convention, Al From, the DLC’s grand pooh-bah, moaned, “We can expect GOP presidential candidate George W. Bush to continue aping our politics throughout the rest of the campaign.” Who’s the monkey now? Nanoseconds after the Lieberman news hit the cable shows, the Bush campaign gleefully zapped out a nose-thumbing statement: “From Social Security reform to missile defense, tort reform to parental notification [regarding abortion], and from school choice to affirmative action, Al Gore has chosen a man whose positions are more similar to Governor Bush’s than to his own.” An overstatement, but a very useful one for the Republicans.

Lieberman is hardly a base-player. He shares Gore’s corporate-friendly trade position, which irritates unionists. (He has supported labor on less contentious matters, such as workplace safety standards and the minimum wage. His voting record rates 80 percent on the AFL-CIO’s scorecard.) Let Gore defend Lieberman’s opposition to affirmative action next time he visits a black church. Lieberman, a hawk during the Gulf War and the Kosovo bombing, has urged the party to be “pro-business” and led the charge for capital gains tax cuts. He is not in tune with Gore’s recent populist thrusts against Big Oil, Big Pharmaceuticals and Big Insurance. He would protect HMOs from lawsuits seeking punitive damages, and he opposed the Clinton healthcare plan in favor of a more limited proposal put out by the insurance companies that have generously underwritten his campaigns. He is in favor of gun control, supportive of gay rights (but not same-sex marriage), usually a reliable vote for environmentalists and pro-choice (although as Connecticut Attorney General back in the eighties, he did fight to cut off Medicaid funding for abortion–and lost).

Lieberman has built his reputation by advancing conservative positions on social issues. Out-Tippering Tipper, he teamed up with GOP culture cop William Bennett to assail Hollywood and the music industry, targeting rap music. (So much for the young urban black vote.) He wrote the law that required V-chips in television sets. His DLC has called for making it tougher to obtain a divorce. (Lieberman is once-divorced and has remarried.) He chairs the Center for Jewish and Christian Values, which aims to bring Jews and Christians together “to build a more moral society in America”–but apparently “moral” from a conservative perspective.

The twenty-five-member board Lieberman oversees is top-loaded with right-wingers, including Elliott Abrams, Gary Bauer, William Bennett, Jack Kemp, Jeane Kirkpatrick, William Kristol, Michael Medved, Michael Novak and Ralph Reed. (The outfit that sponsors the center, the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews, attributes out-of-wedlock births, juvenile crime and “a breakdown in basic morality” to the absence of school prayer.) The sanctimonious Lieberman has perfected a neo-Democratic recipe: Offer suburbanites dollops of liberalism on safe issues like the environment and chunks of conservatism on the so-called values issues of welfare, crime, education and culture, while providing plenty of assistance to the party’s corporate funders.

Perhaps Gore had planned a DLC-ish lurch to the right all along. His populist us-against-the-powerful bit–well, that was just a summer fling. Or perhaps this all-too-cautious pol decided it was time to get funky and do something bold–break the Jew barrier. But Gore’s partnership with Lieberman smacks of an “oh shit” overreaction to the Bush show in Philadelphia. With Lieberman, he has accepted–or surrendered to–the Bush terms of battle.

Thank you for reading The Nation

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read, just one of the many incisive, deeply-reported articles we publish daily. Now more than ever, we need fearless journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media.

Throughout this critical election year and a time of media austerity and renewed campus activism and rising labor organizing, independent journalism that gets to the heart of the matter is more critical than ever before. Donate right now and help us hold the powerful accountable, shine a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug, and build a more just and equitable future.

For nearly 160 years, The Nation has stood for truth, justice, and moral clarity. As a reader-supported publication, we are not beholden to the whims of advertisers or a corporate owner. But it does take financial resources to report on stories that may take weeks or months to properly investigate, thoroughly edit and fact-check articles, and get our stories into the hands of readers.

Donate today and stand with us for a better future. Thank you for being a supporter of independent journalism.

Ad Policy