News Avoidance and the Climate Majority
The next phase of Covering Climate Now’s 89 Percent Project puts faces to the numbers.
A newspaper box with a paper that reads “Michael Bears Down” in the aftermath of Hurricane Michael in Millville, Florida, on October 11, 2018.
(Emily Kask / AFP via Getty Images)Jon Batiste sympathizes with the growing number of people avoiding the news these days, but the global music star has an antidote: Talk about climate solutions and “bring people together. People power is the way that you can change things in the world.”
Forty percent of the world’s people practice “news avoidance,” according to the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism’s “Digital News Report 2025.” Traditional news coverage’s focus on conflict and suffering, along with its portrayal of politicians as the sole arbiters of events, leaves people feeling depressed and powerless, survey respondents said, causing many to tune out.
During the newsmaker interview Covering Climate Now organized last week for the next phase of The 89 Percent Project, Batiste was asked if his new song about climate change, “Petrichor,” can make a social impact, given that many people now shun news about topics as weighty as climate change. “I don’t want to hear about the problem if you don’t have an answer,” Batiste said, adding that his song “is not just saying [climate change] is a problem. It’s also saying we can solve it.”
The same spirit animates The 89 Percent Project. Launched in April, the project’s initial reporting highlighted the fact that 80 to 89 percent of the world’s people want their governments to take stronger climate action. However, most of those people don’t realize that they are the overwhelming majority—and therefore they don’t act, vote, or speak out, like it.
The next phase of The 89 Percent Project explores the people behind the numbers: Who are they? Where do they live, what do they do with their lives, are they surprised they’re the majority, and what kinds of climate policies do they wish to see implemented?
Some Covering Climate Now partners have already begun this reporting. The Guardian posted a story soliciting readers’ written responses to such questions (anonymously if so desired). In Brazil, Agência Pública conducted person-on-the-street interviews], gauging support for climate action. And Japan’s The Asahi Shimbun took a hybrid approach, studying the findings of public opinion polls and then checking them against the paper’s own interviews.
The goal of this phase of The 89 Percent Project is to present a vivid, factually grounded portrait of the global climate majority in all its diversity and potential. With news avoidance at an all-time high, this kind of reporting—featuring the names, faces, and sentiments of the overwhelming majority of the public—makes good commercial as well as journalistic sense.
Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation
Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.
We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.
In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen.
Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering.
With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now.
While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account.
I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.
Onward,
Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and publisher, The Nation
