Liz Cheney Finally Proved Me Right
Fifteen years ago, she told me we had no common ground. I disagreed. This week she endorsed Kamala Harris, and she has my gratitude.
Liz Cheney, former US representative from Wyoming, speaks in Atlanta at an event honoring Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
(Paras Griffin / Getty Images)
Once upon a time, Liz Cheney told me we had no common ground. None. We were appearing on CNN with Campbell Brown in June 2009, in a segment then called “The Great Debate.” (It was not.) I was there to defend President Obama’s decision to close the Guantánamo prison; Cheney was against it. (Spoiler alert: It’s still open.)
I got the better of it, because I told the truth: Former president George W. Bush had himself promised to close it. Cheney insisted I was wrong.
“Liz, the top military leaders of our country want Guantánamo closed. President Bush…gave a speech where he said he would close it, and he would bring people home and try them here,” I attempted.
“No, I’m sorry,” Cheney came back. “He did not say he would bring terrorists onto the homeland. Joan, no, he didn’t say that.”
But he did. Bush said in June 2006: “I’d like to end Guantánamo. I’d like it to be over with. One of the things we will do is we’ll send people back to their home countries.… There are some who need to be tried in US courts. They’re cold-blooded killers.… And yet, we believe there ought to be a way forward in a court of law.”
Before a commercial break, Brown asked us to think about whether we could find common ground, a regular feature of “The Great Debate.”
“Campbell, I just don’t think there is,” Cheney replied. As an approval-seeking weirdo, I disagreed. “First of all, we both love and admire our fathers. Second of all, I believe we both really and truly want to keep America safe.”
It was one of the strangest TV segments I’ve ever been part of, and I debated Bill O’Reilly.
Fifteen years later, Liz Cheney proved me right, when she endorsed Kamala Harris for president on Wednesday night.
I found her endorsement strangely moving. I try not to hate anyone—as I told a onetime political adversary who claimed I hated her candidate, “I don’t hate him. I don’t hate anyone—well, except Hitler.” But I might have hated Liz Cheney a little. She stood for many things I don’t believe in. Especially her father, Dick Cheney’s defense of torture. (But maybe I’m lucky my beloved father didn’t believe in torture, or else I would too.)
But I have to say: Liz Cheney has sacrificed more, personally, than I have to advance the truth about Donald Trump, once she got it. Yes, she voted for him twice, and she voted against his first impeachment. But January 6 broke her. And while it seemed to break other Republicans, like House minority leader Mitch McConnell and the cowardly Kevin McCarthy (eventually to be a very ephemeral House speaker), they swerved back into their Trump-obedient lanes and ignored the damage he did, and continues to do, to our democracy. She voted for his second impeachment, related to January 6. She joined the bipartisan January 6 commission.
And she paid for all of that with her Wyoming House seat, which was a longtime goal of hers, and of her father. People said she could be the first female president (many people have thought that would have to be a Republican). Now she’s putting her muscle behind Kamala Harris’s being the person to break that glass ceiling.
I wrote earlier this week that the most cowardly Republicans are those allegedly “whispering” that they hope Trump loses, while publicly endorsing him. The next most timid are those who say they won’t vote for him, but won’t vote for Harris either. (I see you, former Pennsylvania senator Pat Toomey. Why?)
Popular
“swipe left below to view more authors”Swipe →I admire all the Never Trumpers who’ve come over to our side, whether they’ve left the Republican Party or merely endorsed Harris. But at this moment, I especially admire Liz Cheney. Her endorsement was conservative, and well thought through:
“I don’t believe that we have the luxury of writing in candidates’ names, particularly in swing states,” Cheney said Wednesday at Duke University. “As a conservative, as someone who believes in and cares about the Constitution, I have thought deeply about this. And because of the danger that Donald Trump poses, not only am I not voting for Donald Trump, but I will be voting for Kamala Harris.”
So many people, over the last two presidential election cycles, have made write-in votes. Bush says he left the presidential ballot blank in 2016, and he wrote in former secretary of state Condoleezza Rice in 2020. Yeah, that really helped, dude. Let’s hope Liz Cheney helps him do the actual right thing this time around.
I believe that Liz Cheney is the kind of no-bullshit Republican who can create a permission structure for other Republicans to make this choice: not just not to vote for Trump but to vote for Harris, which matters more. I’d love to believe that her political odyssey has led her to agree with me/us more than I know, but I don’t need that. I respect her courage for doing this. I’ll be trying to track her down on the campaign trail, where she says she’ll be.
Liz, I told you we could find common ground. Let’s have a cup of coffee. Or even a beer?
Support independent journalism that does not fall in line
Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets.
Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.
As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war.
In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth.
The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more.
But this journalism is possible only with your support.
This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?
More from The Nation
Trump’s War Is Destroying the Global Economy Trump’s War Is Destroying the Global Economy
Spiraling financial chaos might be the only thing that can force the president to pull back from this conflict.
Make America Great Again Make America Great Again
Who are the immigrants?
OppArt / Anonymous and Peter Kuper
How the Abortion Rights Activists Found Their Radical Imagination How the Abortion Rights Activists Found Their Radical Imagination
A long-shot campaign to restore public funding for abortion turned into the movement’s biggest success in a generation.
An Argument Against Voting for the “Electable” Guy An Argument Against Voting for the “Electable” Guy
In this week’s Elie v. US, The Nation’s justice correspondent shares his thoughts on the Texas primaries. Plus, a terrible Supreme Court decision and a bad play by Major League Ba...
A Conflict Without Reason Has Become a Dangerous Holy War A Conflict Without Reason Has Become a Dangerous Holy War
Lacking a clear rationale for the attack on Iran, Trumpists are increasingly talking like crusaders.
