No Ceasefire, but Netanyahu Proposes Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize
A new Global South bloc, the Hague Group, will meet July 15 in Bogotá to address Israel’s escalating crimes under international law.

When Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu illegally began bombing Iran on June 13, he not only succeeded in significantly reducing media coverage of Gaza and undermining Trump’s nuclear diplomacy. He also derailed international efforts to address the underlying source of decades of regional instability: Israel’s illegal occupation of Palestine. Israel’s attack on Iran caused the UN to postpone a conference on the issue, cochaired by France and Saudi Arabia, set to begin on June 17. Proponents hoped it would generate a new international coalition dedicated to establishing a Palestinian state.
Now that broader regional war appears to have been averted, the international community must unite to stop Israel from starving and massacring Gaza and finally address the Israeli occupation, the festering wound that has driven instability in the Middle East for decades.
Netanyahu knows how to manipulate Trump. During his visit to the White House on Monday, he presented Trump with a nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize, an award that Trump has long coveted. Trump has already been nominated by the government of Pakistan as well as a member of Congress. The meeting did not produce a significant announcement, although speculation had swirled that Trump might announce an expansion of the Abraham Accords, perhaps to include Syria, or a ceasefire in Gaza.
But we have been here before. Even if a ceasefire is implemented, we know that Netanyahu will return to bombing Gaza whenever he chooses. A Trump-Netanyahu ceasefire will only provide a temporary respite from the unspeakable horrors that Palestinians in Gaza have had to endure for almost two years, which follow nearly two decades of a crippling blockade. Netanyahu has no intention of ending the Israeli occupation, and Trump has signaled his complete commitment to Netanyahu.
The rest of the world must act. As of now, France and Saudi Arabia have not yet announced if their UN conference will occur; a rescheduled conference might coincide with the UN General Assembly meeting in September. Even if the conference convenes, it is unclear whether the countries involved would impose real consequences on Israel.
Another coalition of countries has emerged that is willing to take action. The Hague Group, a coalition from the Global South cochaired by South Africa and Colombia, will meet in Bogotá on July 15 and 16 for an emergency ministerial meeting on how to stop Israel’s escalating violations of international law, including the crime of genocide. Francesca Albanese, the UN special rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territories, recorded a video urging countries to attend, saying, “Every government that believes in international law and the future of humanity should be there.”
I was involved with the preparations for the now postponed UN conference, and I will be attending the emergency meeting in Bogotá, which I hope will help to galvanize a global movement to both stop Israel’s genocide and evade Washington’s efforts to shield Tel Aviv from accountability.
This is what I hope will come out of the emergency meeting in Bogotá: Where political will is greatest, states should impose an arms embargo on Israel; restrict visas and freeze the assets of all senior government and military officials; impose trade and import restrictions; bar Israeli participation in international cultural events and competitions. These measures reflect similar consequences imposed upon Russia for its illegal invasion of Ukraine.
For countries interested in less stringent but still meaningful sanctions, they could impose visa bans on Netanyahu and Gallant, the two Israeli leaders under International Criminal Court warrant, and label settlement goods at the point of sale.
Critics fear that the only countries that matter are those least likely to act: the United States, Germany, and the UK, which provide the bulk of weapons used in Israeli atrocities. Meanwhile, the EU is Israel’s largest trading partner, yet for the EU to act collectively often requires full consensus.
Yet that does not preclude EU members from taking individual action, as Ireland and Spain have done. Even in the absence of American or European participation, a coalition of the willing can impose real consequences, similar to international pressure on apartheid South Africa that eventually grew into a global movement.
If the international community continues to fail to impose consequences on Israel, this will reiterate the message of impunity that the world has sent Israel for decades, a message that emboldened members of the IDF to not only engage in horrifying abuses but to gleefully publish their crimes online.
Netanyahu briefly succeeded in distracting the world from Israel’s crimes in Gaza. The world must unite with coordinated action to finally impose consequences and end both the genocide and the occupation.
An urgent message from the Editors
As the editors of The Nation, it’s not usually our role to fundraise. Today, however, we’re putting out a special appeal to our readers, because there are only hours left in 2025 and we’re still $20,000 away from our goal of $75,000. We need you to help close this gap.
Your gift to The Nation directly supports the rigorous, confrontational, and truly independent journalism that our country desperately needs in these dark times.
2025 was a terrible year for press freedom in the United States. Trump launched personal attack after personal attack against journalists, newspapers, and broadcasters across the country, including multiple billion-dollar lawsuits. The White House even created a government website to name and shame outlets that report on the administration with anti-Trump bias—an exercise in pure intimidation.
The Nation will never give in to these threats and will never be silenced. In fact, we’re ramping up for a year of even more urgent and powerful dissent.
With the 2026 elections on the horizon, and knowing Trump’s history of false claims of fraud when he loses, we’re going to be working overtime with writers like Elie Mystal, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Jeet Heer, Kali Holloway, Katha Pollitt, and Chris Lehmann to cut through the right’s spin, lies, and cover-ups as the year develops.
If you donate before midnight, your gift will be matched dollar for dollar by a generous donor. We hope you’ll make our work possible with a donation. Please, don’t wait any longer.
In solidarity,
The Nation Editors
More from The Nation
We Need to Pay Attention to What’s Going on in Sudan We Need to Pay Attention to What’s Going on in Sudan
The ongoing genocide has been largely overlooked by the international community.
Netanyahu Is Destroying Trump’s Flimsy Peace Plans Netanyahu Is Destroying Trump’s Flimsy Peace Plans
The talk of a new Middle East is belied by Israel’s attacks on Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, and Iran.
Brace Yourselves for Trump’s New Monroe Doctrine Brace Yourselves for Trump’s New Monroe Doctrine
Trump's latest exploits in Latin America are just the latest expression of a bloody ideological project to entrench US power and protect the profits of Western multinationals.
Chile at the Crossroads Chile at the Crossroads
A dramatic shift to the extreme right threatens the future—and past—for human rights and accountability.
The New Europeans, Trump-Style The New Europeans, Trump-Style
Donald Trump is sowing division in the European Union, even as he calls on it to spend more on defense.
The United States’ Hidden History of Regime Change—Revisited The United States’ Hidden History of Regime Change—Revisited
The truculent trio—Trump, Hegseth, and Rubio—do Venezuela.
