The GOP Is Trying to Destroy Your Medicaid
Republicans are trying to ram through some of the most harmful anti-welfare policies in living memory.
The GOP’s so-called big beautiful bill, passed by the House in May, comes with an ugly surprise: It would force poor people into work in order to prove that they are worthy of life’s basic necessities. House Republicans, to help pay for their main goals—giving the wealthy even more tax breaks and ramping up the Trump administration’s brutal anti-immigrant regime—not only plan to force all states to institute work requirements in their Medicaid plans, but will also allow them to impose the harshest such rules ever. Their bill orders nearly all childless adults without disabilities to certify that they were working, volunteering, or going to school in the month before enrollment. But states could require people to show they’ve been working for as much as a year before they can be enrolled. Anyone who fails to submit the proper paperwork, meanwhile, would be barred not just from Medicaid but also from receiving subsidies for coverage obtained in the Affordable Care Act marketplace.
These changes would kick as many as 14.4 million people off Medicaid within a decade, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
Republicans have claimed that they’re not going to cut Medicaid. “The president said over and over and over, ‘We’re not going to touch Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid,’” House Speaker Mike Johnson said in February. “We’ve made the same commitment.” The program, which turns 60 this year, has become integrated into American life. It covers 83 million people—nearly a quarter of all Americans—and Republicans don’t want to be seen as taking it away from their constituents.
But work requirements have been included in the bill only because Republicans know they will reduce Medicaid enrollment and, therefore, spending. A look at the fine print shows this clearly: The bill estimates that Medicaid work requirements will save $273 billion, which can be used to help pay for the GOP’s tax cuts and its crackdown on immigration.
Attempts by states to implement work requirements prove that they are merely cuts by another name. When Arkansas implemented a Medicaid work requirement during the first Trump administration, more than 18,000 people lost their coverage. The work requirement, despite its name, “did not increase employment,” according to a 2020 paper.
Things have been going just as poorly in Georgia, which in 2023 created a new Medicaid offering with a work requirement. The state estimated that 50,000 people would enroll in its first year, but only about 5,000 had signed up a year and a half in.
The House bill would also force more people to meet work requirements in order to receive food stamps, applying them to everyone under 65 as well as people with children age 7 or older, and would also limit a state’s ability to waive the requirements during periods of high unemployment. The Urban Institute found that these changes would eliminate or reduce food stamps for 5.4 million people. The work requirements that already exist in the food stamps program have been found, just as in Medicaid, to deny people benefits they need without increasing the number of people who work.
The idea that poor people should be forced to work for meager government assistance is not a new one. President Ronald Reagan successfully whipped up resentment toward poor and Black people with his stories about welfare queens who supposedly lived large off of government checks. Bill Clinton ran for president on the promise to “end welfare as we know it.” He succeeded, ending a right to cash assistance for poor mothers and turning the process of qualifying for the program into a series of hoops for recipients to jump through, which many conservative states promptly lit on fire. One of the hoops was the requirement that people regularly prove that they were working or searching for work.
A lot of people don’t make it through. Today, just one in five poor people receives cash assistance, and an increasing number have neither cash benefits nor income from work. People subjected to welfare work requirements, meanwhile, are no more likely to be employed five years after they were instituted, and those who are employed tend to have unstable work that doesn’t last.
Back in the 1980s and ’90s, work requirements were applied to “welfare,” which was understood to mean cash assistance. But Republicans have worked hard to force almost any government program under the welfare umbrella. In a New York Times op-ed, four high-ranking Trump officials recently wrote that Medicaid, food stamps, and even housing assistance are “welfare” and called for establishing “universal work requirements” in all such programs.
It was always a stretch to imagine that Americans were able to live lives of luxury off of cash assistance and so needed to be forced into paid employment. It’s impossible to claim the same about programs that are merely meant to guarantee that no one goes without the very basics of life: food, health, and housing. These programs are not “the dole.” They help ensure that, in one of the wealthiest countries in the world, people aren’t left to starve, suffer homelessness, and die.
Support independent journalism that does not fall in line
Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets.
Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.
As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war.
In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth.
The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more.
But this journalism is possible only with your support.
This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?
