Politics / StudentNation / October 29, 2025

Even in Oregon, the Fight for Marriage Equality Might Not Be Over

After the state’s ban on gay marriage was lifted in 2014, advocates took a breath. But more than a decade later, with Obergefell now at risk, there’s still more work to be done.

Charlie Bloomer

The Portland Pride Parade and Festival in June 2019.


(Diego Diaz / Getty)

In 2014, one year before Obergefell v. Hodges, a US district court decision in Geiger v. Kitzhaber finally lifted the ban on gay marriage in Oregon. Advocates had been gathering signatures for a statewide ballot measure, but dropped the campaign as county officials began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples. “We are confident that the freedom to marry is secure in Oregon and that we do not need to move forward with the ballot measure,” said Oregon United for Marriage after the ruling. “It is time to celebrate this victory.”

The advocates who had worked tirelessly on the issue took a breath. Marriage equality was finally protected across Oregon—or so they thought.

More than a decade later, in light of a federal frenzy of budget cuts and worrying Supreme Court rulings, advocates fear what might come next, including the prospect that Obergefell could soon be overturned. Although the Geiger decision allowed gay marriage in the state, the Oregon constitution still maintains that “only a marriage between one man and one woman shall be valid or legally recognized as a marriage” in Article 15 Section 5A.

“Now we’re seeing there’s more work to be done,” said Gaby Gardiner of Basic Rights Oregon. “The fight isn’t over. We still have marriage defined as a man and our women in [the state] Constitution.”

The statewide “Equal Rights for All” campaign aims to amend the nondiscrimination clause in the Oregon constitution with more inclusive, specific language, ensuring reproductive access, gender-affirming care, and marriage equality. “It’s not entirely clear what would happen with marriage equality in Oregon if [Obergefell] were overturned,” said Blair Stenvick, communications manager at Basic Rights Oregon. “But we do know that marriage equality here would be at risk, and the question would likely have to be figured out in the courts. Our amendment would provide clarity.”

Since a ballot measure must be submitted as one issue, the through line for these topics is equal rights. “Until our rights to personal freedom and bodily autonomy are protected in the Oregon constitution,” the campaign writes on its website, “we are always just one election or one bad US Supreme Court decision away from losing the right to abortion, gender-affirming care, and marriage equality in Oregon.”

To get onto the November 2026 ballot, the initiative—introduced by Basic Rights Oregon, the American Civil Liberties Union, and Planned Parenthood—needs around 156,000 signatures from voters by summer 2026. (As a precaution, the campaign is aiming for more than 200,000.) So far, according to Gardiner, 40,000 signatures have been gathered as dozens of organizations across Oregon have endorsed the campaign. “We’re feeling really good about where we’re at, especially because those [signatures] were all collected by volunteers,” said Stenvick.

The campaign has served as both a legal and symbolic statement for the many queer people who live in Portland, often seeking refuge from social persecution. “A lot of people come [to Portland] from other states, because it’s a little bit more open here,” said Haydyn Davila, an organizing intern for Basic Rights Oregon. But the Equal Rights for All campaign takes a broader approach than just marriage equality. “The marriage campaign was very singularly focused on some members of our communities and not all members,” Gardiner said. “We’re not one-dimensional. There’s a wide scope of intersectionality within our communities, of folks who are immigrants, who are transgender, who have disabilities. Giving everyone their right to personal autonomy and choice is really important.”

At first, after the overturning of Roe v. Wade, the group tried to get the “Equal Rights for All” amendment passed through legislative referral. In 2023, Senate majority leader Kate Lieber introduced the amendment to the Constitution under the same premise of protecting same-sex marriage, abortion, and gender-affirming care. “We really thought that, at the time, we had a slam-dunk issue,” Gardiner said. The amendment made it through the initial Committee on Rules voting, but ultimately died to end a six-week Republican walkout over measures surrounding abortion, gender-affirming care, and gun regulation.

Instead, Basic Rights Oregon, the ACLU, and Planned Parenthood collaboratively took the measure straight to the constituents, announcing the campaign as a proposed ballot measure in June 2024. “What we want to do is have a campaign that builds momentum,” said Gardiner, “to get people to understand the importance of bodily autonomy and right to privacy.”

Since then, signature collection materialized and has created a grassroots network of volunteers across the state—from Portland Pride events and No Kings demonstrations to small-town fairs—including Olivia Han, a 16-year-old high school student, who has been collecting signatures at her local farmers market in addition to her schoolwork. Although advocacy organizations in Portland have no shortage of work—especially with Trump’s threat to deploy the National Guard—the campaign continues to be a central focus. “It’s true, tangible change,” Han said. “It’s really pushing for the rights and for the equality of all people.”

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Charlie Bloomer

Charlie Bloomer is a writer from Oregon who focuses on arts, culture, and grassroots organizing and is a scholar of distinction at Barnard College. Her work has been seen in The Oregonian and Portland's alt-weekly Willamette Week.

More from The Nation

What to Do With the Ballroom in 2029?

What to Do With the Ballroom in 2029? What to Do With the Ballroom in 2029?

Kristi Kremed.

Steve Brodner

The Supreme Court Has a Serial Killer Problem

The Supreme Court Has a Serial Killer Problem The Supreme Court Has a Serial Killer Problem

In this week's Elie v. U.S., The Nation’s justice correspondent recaps a major death penalty case that came before the high court as well as the shenanigans of a man who’s angling...

Elie Mystal

House minority leader Hakeem Jeffries speaks at a news conference at the Capitol on December 1, 2025.

Corporate Democrats Are Foolishly Surrendering the AI Fight Corporate Democrats Are Foolishly Surrendering the AI Fight

Voters want the party to get tough on the industry. But Democratic leaders are following the money instead.

Jeet Heer

Marching Against a Corrupt Regime

Marching Against a Corrupt Regime Marching Against a Corrupt Regime

People taking to the streets for democracy.

OppArt / Josh Gosfield

Attorney General Pam Bondi, Vice President JD Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem flank Donald Trump during an executive order signing in the Oval Office, on August 25, 2025.

It Would Be Madness to Give Trump and His Toadies Even More Power It Would Be Madness to Give Trump and His Toadies Even More Power

And yet, that’s what the Supreme Court appears prepared to do.

Sasha Abramsky

Miami Mayor-elect Eileen Higgins speaks to supporters as she celebrates her victory at her election-night party held at the Miami Women's Club on December 9, 2025.

Trump Is Dragging Republicans to Crushing Defeat After Crushing Defeat Trump Is Dragging Republicans to Crushing Defeat After Crushing Defeat

The president is deeply unpopular, his policies are failing, and Republicans are losing—everywhere.

John Nichols