Politics / November 22, 2024

Democrats Must Do Everything They Can to Block the Dangerous Nonprofit Bill

The House passed a bill aimed at giving the government sweeping powers to crush nonprofits and attack supporters of Palestine. Democrats need to stand firmly in its way.

Darryl Li
Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., Sen. Deb Fischer, R-Neb., and Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La., participate in the "first nail ceremony," marking the start of construction of the inauguration platform on the West Front plaza of the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday, September 18, 2024.
Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., Sen. Deb Fischer, R-Neb., and Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La., participate in the “first nail ceremony,” marking the start of construction of the inauguration platform on the West Front plaza of the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday, September 18, 2024. (Tom Williams / CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

While President-elect Donald Trump doesn’t return to office until January 20, Congress is already advancing the most sweeping and dangerous terrorism legislation in a generation, which would give him the power to shut down legitimate civil society groups doing important charitable, community organizing, human rights, and humanitarian work.

Earlier this week, the House passed HR 9495, an amendment to the tax code that would empower the Treasury Department to unilaterally brand nonprofit groups as “terrorist supporting organizations” and suspend their charitable tax exemption, without giving the groups any due process or access to the evidence against them. The resulting stigma of such a designation would almost certainly be enough to scare off banks, likely depriving these groups of the ability to function altogether.

The drive to kill nonprofits is dangerous no matter who is president, and, in the past few weeks, most House Democrats appear to have woken up to the risks of the legislation. Fifty-two Democrats voted to support the bill as recently as last week, but by the time a subsequent vote came around on Thursday, only 15 voted in favor. But that was still enough to give Republicans the votes they needed to pass it. Going forward, the demand from everyone watching this process should be clear: Even one Democratic vote is one too many, and Senate Democrats should promise that they will not support the legislation.

It’s not hard to see the reason behind this sudden attack on nonprofits. The bill’s sponsors have made no secret of their desire to smear certain nonprofits connected with campus protests against Israel’s war on Gaza as working at the behest of Hamas—a claim for which there is no evidence. Israel’s supporters in Congress and elsewhere have been equally clear about their agenda to crush Palestine human rights advocacy in the United States. Just last month, the Heritage Foundation unveiled “Project Esther,” a policy blueprint to attack supporters of Palestinian rights in the higher-education and profit sectors—essentially an anti-Palestinian Project 2025.

But the dangers extend far beyond any one issue. Two Republican House committee chairs earlier this year sent a letter to Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen demanding information on 20 groups, from Students for Justice in Palestine (which isn’t even a registered nonprofit) to liberal behemoths like the Open Society Foundations and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Such persecutions would compound an already draconian legal landscape for nonprofits and political organizations. As civil liberties advocates have pointed out, providing “material support” to groups on the foreign terrorist organizations (FTO) list has been a federal crime since the 1990s. The material support statute extends far beyond blocking funds to punish many forms of speech and advocacy ordinarily protected by the First Amendment. And under the broad authority of sanctions laws, the government has also asserted the authority to freeze the assets of US-based organizations without due process, shutting down multiple American Muslim charities after 9/11 as part of a broader crackdown that targeted Palestinians in the Chicago area in particular.

Current Issue

Cover of April 2025 Issue

The danger of the new proposal lies in disguising sweeping powers to shut down civil society groups as incremental change. Federal agencies maintain many lists of alleged terrorist organizations through designation processes that have long been criticized as opaque, unreviewable, and discriminatory against Muslims. Because these mechanisms have been applied almost exclusively to foreign groups, courts have largely upheld them on the theory that the executive branch enjoys a comparatively free hand in dealing with international threats.

Thus, despite the massive post-9/11 expansion of the government’s surveillance and policing powers, many of the laws targeting foreign terrorist groups have never had a domestic counterpart. The material support statute is the exception that proves the rule: It allows punishment of US citizens, but only for supporting groups on the FTO list. The main legal reason for this has been the First Amendment’s protection of the freedom of association. The main political reason has been pushback from right-wing politicians sympathetic to white nationalist groups, as well as from progressive civil libertarians.

This bill creates yet another due process–free terrorism list, but one that is parasitic on the existing ones. By tying the designation of US nonprofits to existing terrorism lists designed only for foreign groups that are largely Muslim in membership, the bill creates a domestic terrorism regime that will almost inevitably exclude white nationalists.

It is unsurprising that the coalition necessary to overcome skepticism from left and right alike toward proscribing domestic organizations on terrorism grounds is catalyzed by the bipartisan animosity to Palestinian liberation on Capitol Hill. There is a longer history at work here: Nearly every major development in anti-terrorism law in the decades before 9/11 was motivated in significant part by bipartisan opposition to the Palestinian national liberation movement and its allies. The word “terrorism” first appeared in a 1969 federal statute in a law restricting humanitarian aid to Palestinian refugees. The 1996 material support statute resulted from intense lobbying by pro-Israel groups seeking a crackdown on activism in the Palestinian diaspora. It did not take long for these laws to be used against Muslim communities more broadly and to contribute to an erosion of civil liberties for all Americans. Similarly, it is all too easy to see how the “terrorist-supporting organizations” list could grow and form the basis for wider forms of sanction and domestic repression, particularly under a second Trump administration.

Democrats are still in control of the Senate until January, and they will still have the filibuster after that. If they don’t do everything they can to prevent this bill from becoming law, it will only be the latest betrayal in a long and self-defeating embrace of draconian right-wing policies—and likely a sign of far worse to come.

Support independent journalism that exposes oligarchs and profiteers


Donald Trump’s cruel and chaotic second term is just getting started. In his first month back in office, Trump and his lackey Elon Musk (or is it the other way around?) have proven that nothing is safe from sacrifice at the altar of unchecked power and riches.

Only robust independent journalism can cut through the noise and offer clear-eyed reporting and analysis based on principle and conscience. That’s what The Nation has done for 160 years and that’s what we’re doing now.

Our independent journalism doesn’t allow injustice to go unnoticed or unchallenged—nor will we abandon hope for a better world. Our writers, editors, and fact-checkers are working relentlessly to keep you informed and empowered when so much of the media fails to do so out of credulity, fear, or fealty.

The Nation has seen unprecedented times before. We draw strength and guidance from our history of principled progressive journalism in times of crisis, and we are committed to continuing this legacy today.

We’re aiming to raise $25,000 during our Spring Fundraising Campaign to ensure that we have the resources to expose the oligarchs and profiteers attempting to loot our republic. Stand for bold independent journalism and donate to support The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel

Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Darryl Li

Darryl Li is an anthropologist and lawyer teaching at the University of Chicago and an author of “Anti-Palestinian at the Core: The Origins and Growing Dangers of U.S. Anti-Terrorism Law,” a report published by Palestine Legal and the Center for Constitutional Rights.

More from The Nation

Protesters hold signs during a national day of action against Trump administration's mass firing of National Park Service employees at Yosemite National Park, California, on March 1, 2025.

Trump’s War on Public Lands Moves to its Second Phase Trump’s War on Public Lands Moves to its Second Phase

The Great Firing continues—and the next round of layoffs will reveal how much power over public lands the Trump administration will cede to corporations.

Lazo Gitchos

Demonstrators from the human rights organization Jewish Voice for Peace are detained by NYPD officers as they hold a civil disobedience action inside Trump Tower in New York on March 13, 2025.

Trump’s Mob-Boss Offer to Us Jews: Accept “Protection”—or Else Trump’s Mob-Boss Offer to Us Jews: Accept “Protection”—or Else

Under the guise of “fighting antisemitism,” Trump is shredding our rights and telling us we are safe.

Dave Zirin

Protest Tesla

Protest Tesla Protest Tesla

Street action at Tesla, Route 22, Springfield, NJ, March 1, 2025.

OppArt / Karen Guancione

Donald Trump speaks at the Justice Department March 14, 2025, in Washington, DC.

Trump Is Trying to Create His Own Personal Legal Strike Force Trump Is Trying to Create His Own Personal Legal Strike Force

With his speech at the DOJ, Trump officially declared his intention to reshape the legal system according to his whims and will.

Elie Mystal

Sherrod Brown: Three decades of talking about the dignity of work wasn’t enough to save him.

How the American Left Became Conservative How the American Left Became Conservative

Against the radical, if reactionary, experiment run from the White House, everyone from Democratic leaders in Congress to MSNBC hosts have turned to the defense of institutions.

Michael Kazin

Hundreds of protesters outside of a New York court to protest the arrest and detention of Mahmoud Khalil.

Mahmoud Khalil Is “Ready to Fight” His Unlawful Detention Mahmoud Khalil Is “Ready to Fight” His Unlawful Detention

StudentNation spoke with Shezza Abboushi Dallal, a member of Khalil’s legal defense team, about the status of his case and the government’s attack on freedom of speech.

StudentNation / Luca GoldMansour