Politics / May 29, 2024

Trump’s Outreach to the Libertarians Was an Absolute Train Wreck

No matter what you think of Libertarians, they had the good sense to answer Trump’s appeal for support by saying, “I would rather eat my own foot out of a bear trap.”

John Nichols
Donald Trump addresses the Libertarian Party National Convention at the Washington Hilton on May 25, 2024 in Washington, DC.

Donald Trump addresses the Libertarian Party National Convention at the Washington Hilton on May 25, 2024, in Washington, DC.

(Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images)

It is nothing short of amazing that no one informed Donald Trump before he made a desperate personal appeal for the support of the Libertarian Party that Libertarians have never particularly liked him. But Trump got the message loud and clear when he appeared Saturday at the party convention in Washington and was greeted by boos, shouts of “hypocrite,” and a sign that declared, “No wannabe dictators.”

Trump put himself in a bizarre position when he showed up for the Libertarian convention at the Washington Hilton. Asking for an endorsement from a party that he refused to join, even though that refusal disqualified him from being the party’s actual nominee, was definitionally weird. Yet a woefully ill-prepared Trump seemed to believe that his mere presence would win the delegates over.

He got that call dramatically wrong.

By the time the convention balloting began Sunday, Trump barely registered. He won just six write-in votes in the first round of votingfor 0.65 percent of the total. This scorching rebuke came despite the former president appearing at the convention in front of a giant “Become Ungovernable” banner, promising to appoint a Libertarian to his cabinet, and claiming that, with his many recent indictments, “If I wasn’t a Libertarian before, I sure as hell am a Libertarian now.”

Libertarians weren’t just opposed to endorsing Trump—many of them were opposed to even being in the same room with the man. When asked whether the party should consider the former president, a delegate told NBC News, “I would rather eat my own foot out of a bear trap.” Chase Oliver, the Georgian whom the party nominated as its candidate for the presidency after multiple rounds of balloting on Sunday, said, “I don’t like having a war criminal on this stage. I don’t feel he deserves a spot on this stage. While I think it was a mistake to have invited Donald Trump, I’m glad he got to see a glimpse of what a real Libertarian reception feels like.”

Trump’s big play to expand his base became an exercise in futility and delusion.

The Republican was invited to address the convention in Washington—along with independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who fared only modestly better with the delegates—as part of an effort to heighten the visibility of the third party, which has struggled to gain media attention and to have its candidates included in national debates. “For 50 years, we’ve been trying to get our candidates on the main stage with major party POTUS candidates,” declared Libertarian National Committee chair Angela McArdle. Now, she announced, “we’ve finally succeeded in bringing one to our stage.”

Current Issue

Cover of July 2024 Issue

It was not shocking that the Libertarian Party engaged in a stunt to get publicity for its candidates and its platform. That’s standard operating procedure in American politics generally and for third parties in particular. What was shocking was that Trump agreed to go along with the exercise, apparently imagining that his Art of the Deal negotiating powers would somehow sway a majority of the most ideologically committed activists in American politics.

From the moment he took the stage, it was clear that Trump and his campaign team had miscalculated monumentally. The booing was so intense at times that Trump paused, in seeming disbelief. The authoritarian contender, who has promised to serve as an all-powerful “dictator for a day” if he wins a second term, provoked laughter from the crowd of civil libertarians and small-government enthusiasts when he promised to be a “true friend to Libertarians in the White House.” His announcement that he had come to the convention “asking for the Libertarian Party’s endorsement, or at least lots of your votes” was met with robust jeering.

When Trump seemed to suggest that the 2024 election offers only a binary choice between the Democratic and Republican lines—not a popular assertion with activists who have spent decades building an alternative to the two main parties—things got even messier. “Combine with us in a partnership. We’re asking that of the Libertarians. We must work together. Combine with us,” he pleaded, over a rising chorus of boos. The jeering only grew louder as Trump said, “You have to combine with us. We cannot give crooked Joe Biden four more years.”

As the miserable charade wore on, so did the jeering. There were shouts of “Panderer!” And “Liar!”

Eventually, a loud rhythmic chant of “Hypocrite! Hypocrite! Hypocrite!” echoed through the hotel ballroom, overwhelming the voices of a cadre of non-Libertarian Trump loyalists who had grabbed seats in the room.

Clearly shaken by the crowd response, Trump was reduced to begging. “Nominate me or at least vote for me,” pleaded the Republican, who told the crowd. “It’s very important because we have to get rid of the worst president in history.”

When the booing continued, Trump made a last desperate attempt to portray supporting him as the party’s last best hope for 2024. “Only do that if you want to win; if you want to lose, don’t do that. Keep getting your 3 percent every four years,” he griped.

The Libertarians, who won 3.28 percent of the national vote when they nominated former New Mexico governor Gary Johnson for the presidency in 2016, seemed to be willing to take the risk—as long as they didn’t have to deal with Trump.

But Trump is apparently not done wooing the party. He’s signaling that he will keep trying to stake a claim on Libertarian votes, as he and many Republicans believe they could be critical in an election where battleground states such as Wisconsin, Georgia, and Arizona have been won or lost by under 25,000 votes.

Trump even claimed after the convention fiasco that all had gone according to plan. “The reason I didn’t file paperwork for the Libertarian Nomination, which I would have absolutely gotten if I wanted it (as everyone could tell by the enthusiasm of the Crowd last night!), was the fact that, as the Republican Nominee, I am not allowed to have the Nomination of another Party,” he announced on his Truth Social platform. “Regardless, I believe I will get a Majority of the Libertarian Votes.”

But that’s even more delusional thinking. While Republicans such as former Wisconsin governor Scott Walker have long claimed that Libertarian candidates have cost Trump election wins, by drawing away voters who would otherwise back the GOP nominee, that’s never been the case. There are, to be sure, some small “l” libertarians who might vote for Trump if the big “L” Libertarian Party weren’t on the ballot. But there have always been just as many—or more—who have been open to the Democrats, especially since the party has begun to embrace some libertarian criminal justice reforms, including drug law changes.

A Cato Institute assessment of the Libertarian vote from 2016, when Johnson was the party’s candidate, and 2020, when Clemson University professor Jo Jorgensen secured 1.9 million votes as the nominee, noted, “In 2016, a CBS exit poll asked Johnson supporters who they would have voted for in just a two-candidate race. Twenty-five percent said Hillary Clinton, 15 percent Trump, and 55 percent said they wouldn’t have voted at all.” In October of 2020, Cato added,

a Pew Research poll asked people who had voted for a third‐party candidate in 2016 what they planned to do in 2020: 49 percent said they leaned toward or supported Biden, while 26 percent said they supported Trump. A quarter said they planned to vote for a third‐party candidate again in 2020. If we assume that the 3/4 of voters who voted Green in 2016 but not in 2020 most likely voted for Biden, that might leave libertarians fairly evenly split among Biden, Trump, and Jorgensen. The New York Times exit poll of 15,590 voters showed that of the 5 percent of respondents who voted third‐party in 2016, 60 percent said they preferred Biden and 25 percent went Trump, leaving about 15 percent sticking with a third‐party vote.

Why have so many Libertarians—be they small “l” or big “L”—been so resistant to Trump for so long? Former party chair Nicholas Sarwark sums it up when he says, “Donald Trump is not a Libertarian, because Donald Trump is an authoritarian.”

Thank you for reading The Nation

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read, just one of the many incisive, deeply-reported articles we publish daily. Now more than ever, we need fearless journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media.

Throughout this critical election year and a time of media austerity and renewed campus activism and rising labor organizing, independent journalism that gets to the heart of the matter is more critical than ever before. Donate right now and help us hold the powerful accountable, shine a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug, and build a more just and equitable future.

For nearly 160 years, The Nation has stood for truth, justice, and moral clarity. As a reader-supported publication, we are not beholden to the whims of advertisers or a corporate owner. But it does take financial resources to report on stories that may take weeks or months to properly investigate, thoroughly edit and fact-check articles, and get our stories into the hands of readers.

Donate today and stand with us for a better future. Thank you for being a supporter of independent journalism.

John Nichols

John Nichols is a national affairs correspondent for The Nation. He has written, cowritten, or edited over a dozen books on topics ranging from histories of American socialism and the Democratic Party to analyses of US and global media systems. His latest, cowritten with Senator Bernie Sanders, is the New York Times bestseller It's OK to Be Angry About Capitalism.

More from The Nation

Lewis Lapham, the editor of “Harpers Magazine,” stands near his office in 2004.

Lewis Lapham Salvaged From History What Was Useful, Beautiful, and True Lewis Lapham Salvaged From History What Was Useful, Beautiful, and True

Writer Lewis H. Lapham, longtime editor of Harper’s Magazine and the founder of Lapham’s Quarterly, died in Rome. He was 89.

Obituary / Kelly Burdick

A supporter holds a sign as members of the San Francisco Democratic Party rally in support of Kamala Harris on July 22 at City Hall in San Francisco, California.

Working Families Party Nominates Kamala Harris Ahead of the DNC Working Families Party Nominates Kamala Harris Ahead of the DNC

The nomination gives the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee a second ballot line in New York and a big organizational boost from WFP and its allies.

John Nichols

Benjamin Netanyahu and Kamala Harris shake hands during a meeting in the Vice President's Ceremonial Office in Washington, DC, on Thursday, July 25, 2024.

Kamala Harris Will Shift on Gaza Only if We Make Her Kamala Harris Will Shift on Gaza Only if We Make Her

The vice president’s ascension provides an opening for a new approach to the horror in Palestine. But it won’t happen without sustained political pressure.

Y.L. Al-Sheikh and Nickan Fayyazi

Vice President Kamala Harris speaks to supporters during a campaign rally at West Allis Central High School on July 23 in West Allis, Wisconsin.

Kamala Harris Is Ready for This Fight Kamala Harris Is Ready for This Fight

In a matter of days, Vice President Kamala Harris cleared the path for the Democratic presidential nomination.

Editorial / John Nichols for The Nation

A protester at the Counter-Opening of the Olympics event in Paris on July 25, 2024.

The Paris Olympics Are Kicking Off With Protests The Paris Olympics Are Kicking Off With Protests

“The Olympic Games are profoundly disrupting the lives of French people,” the protesters wrote in a joint statement.“The question then arises: Who benefits from the Games?”

Dave Zirin and Jules Boykoff

Who let the cats out? Republican vice-presidential nominee J.D. Vance.

J.D. Vance’s Hatred of Cat Ladies Is Weirder and More Dangerous Than You Think J.D. Vance’s Hatred of Cat Ladies Is Weirder and More Dangerous Than You Think

Patriarchy, plutocracy, and ethnonationalism fuel the vice-presidential candidate’s bizarre slur.

Jeet Heer