Obama, At Length

Obama, At Length

On the EPA, Clint Eastwood and German soccer.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

I’ve got a new “Think Again” column called,"‘No Opinions Except Ours,’ Says the Washington Post,” and that’s here.

Also, I did this insanely long piece for The Nation, just under 17,000 words, and it’s called “Kabuki Democracy: Why a Progressive Presidency Is Impossible, for Now.” This is the main url, and this is the single page version.

Danielle Ivory is back here. Companies with a financial interest paid for thousands of studies federal regulators are using to assess the health risks of a widely-used herbicide — while independent studies documenting potentially harmful effects on humans have not been included in research the EPA deems relevant. 

EPA records obtained by Danielle Ivory at The Huffington Post Investigative Fund show that at least half the 6,611 studies the agency is reviewing to help make its decision were conducted by scientists and organizations with a financial stake in atrazine, including its manufacturer, Syngenta. More than 80 percent of studies on which the EPA are relying have never been published. This means that they have not undergone rigorous “peer review” by independent scientists. At the same time several prominent studies by independent academic scientists in well-respected scientific journals – showing negative reproductive effects of atrazine in animals and humans – are absent from the EPA’s list.

EPA Senior Policy Analyst William Jordan told the Investigative Fund that industry-sponsored studies tend to be "scientifically more robust than are the studies generated by people in academia" because "companies spend more money on their studies and can attend to details that are potentially important that people in academia just can’t afford to do."

 

Alter-reviews:

I’ve had this theory about Clint Eastwood for a while. I even considered writing a book about him. That’s not gonna happen, so I’ll give it away for free. Here’s the thing.  The second half of Clint’s amazing 35 year/35 movie career can be read, and may very well be intended as penance for the first half. Young Clint glorified violence and treated it as not only fun but also redemptive. They were fun but in many instances, morally repulsive. (Paul Newman turned down the “Dirty Harry” role, but suggested Eastwood instead of himself.) The second, brilliant, auteurist half of his career is all about the shattering power of violence and the stultifying culture of machismo that sustains it.

Think about it. And if you get a chance, and live in the city, go see some of them at “THE COMPLETE CLINT EASTWOOD” festival at the Film Society of Lincoln Center, beginning tomorrow. (Clint will be appearing by Skype on the 10th  with a Q&A following a screening of A Fistful of Dollars.) For more information, visit www.FilmLinc.com. (You can also buy the new box set. I found one on 18th Street for only $100, but still, it’s the movies and it’s not the same.)

 

Mail:

Ed Tracey
Lebanon, New Hampshire
Professor, When they lost their team captain Michael Ballack to an injury a few weeks ago, few gave Germany much of a chance to win the 2010 World Cup. But its young players have stepped-up, and they are now in the semi-finals as I write this. Interestingly, Yossi Sarid of the Israeli newspaper Haaretz wrote, "Now more than ever, it’s okay to root for Germany." In no small part, he observed, because nearly half the team was either born in a different country or are the sons of immigrants (from Nigeria, Turkey, Ghana, Poland, etc.) – all due to a change in the nation’s immigration laws ten years ago (shifting away from bloodlines as the determining factor in granting citizenship). In much the same way that France’s 1998 multi-cultural World Cup championship team upset right-wingers like Jean LePen, Der Spiegel reports that Germany’s Neo-Nazis are not amused. More importantly, a University of Hannover professor was pleased that when a first round game-winning goal was scored by German-born Mesut Özil (of Turkish descent) an old man was (politely) corrected by a shop-keeper after he complained that a Turk won the game: "That is not a Turk, that is a German”.
 

 

Editor’s Note: To contact Eric Alterman, use this form.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x