Letters

Letters

…And the poor get poorer… the Viagra effect… neutralize gerrymandering… put the nation back in The Nation… parochial New York… towering New York… bothered and bewildered

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

…And the Poor Get Poorer

Re Saket Soni’s “Low-Wage Nation” [Jan. 20]: yes, wages have been and are falling or flat. Yes, US workers are, to some degree, “contingent,” as are (legal and illegal) immigrant workers. I could add that a high unemployment rate is the “new normal.”

And these phenomena are caused by not passing an immigration bill? There are laudable reasons for passing that bill, but helping US wage earners is not one of them. Unless, that is, you can repeal the law of supply and demand. Soni is, in effect, advocating the opposite of his well-intentioned cause. An excess of low-skilled labor is not the only cause of US wage earners’ (and no-wage earners’) distress, but it may top the list of economic and social variables.

Jerry Bronk
san francisco


The Viagra Effect

Believe it or not, there was a time, not that long ago, when employers had to offer employees top-notch healthcare or they didn’t get top-notch employees [Katha Pollitt, “Goodbye, 2013,” Jan. 20]. There was also a time when birth control wasn’t even an option—most insurance companies wouldn’t cover it, and if they did, premiums were exorbitant. When did birth control coverage begin? When Viagra came out and was immediately covered. As an employer, I say you do not have, nor should you, the right to dictate anything to your employees.
SSipe


The biggest mistake was having employers control healthcare in the first place. It started during World War II as an incentive when wages were frozen. No employer should have that kind of power over the lives of employees.
Thomas_Blaney


Neutralize Gerrymandering

In “A New Era for New York City” [Jan. 20], Bob Master says, “State-level gerrymandering will preserve redoubts of reactionary power at least until the next redistricting in 2022.”

But the evils of gerrymandering can be neutralized without waiting until 2022. State constitutions can be amended. Promote constitutional amendments that say simply, “The people of the State of _____ direct that a system of elections shall be created by law that results in voting strength in the (House) (Senate) (Congressional delegation) that is distributed between and among the various parties in direct proportion to the distribution of total statewide votes received by each party in the General Election.”

Dan Brown
dewitt, mich.


Put the Nation back in The Nation

This issue’s overabundance of New York content is too much of the city and not enough of the nation. Case in point: Betsy Reed’s “The Education Conversation” [Jan. 20]. She says that overscheduling is but a peccadillo of the rich and not an issue for most families. The parents in my congregation (as well as their children) are not elite families making more than $75,000 per year, yet they continue to be troubled by overscheduling—fitting faith, music, sports, homework, dance, scouts, friends and more into tight schedules.

the Rev. Nicholas Utphall
madison, wis.


Parochial New York

Re Dana Goldstein’s “Will New York Lead the Way on Pre-K?” [Jan. 20]: Oklahoma has had universal pre-K since 1998. New Yorkers have no idea what goes on west of the Hudson.
JB


Towering New York

In “The Fungibility of Air” [Jan. 6/13], Michael Sorkin meticulously details the mind-set in New York City regarding planning and zoning, which has become the basis for our land-use policies. Development is directed primarily toward higher profit, achievable by ever-growing density. Sales of air rights and of public buildings like schools and libraries are used to create this “profitable” density. The problems of congestion, preservation and the inconvenient fact of sea level rise are being dangerously overlooked.

So pervasive is the policy of monetizing our public resources that even a city park, Damrosch Park in Lincoln Center, was destroyed and converted into a profit-making venue for private corporations, thereby excluding the public from its own ever-scarcer space. It has become acceptable to use air rights to build 100- to 150-story buildings on 57th Street, resulting in mile-long shadows on Central Park. Low-lying areas in Hudson River Park, adversely affected by sea rise due to climate change, are nonetheless considered suitable sites for tall buildings.

If the priorities of the residents of this already densely populated city are to be maintained—our parks, sunshine, reduced traffic and development for the public good—we must insist on environmental impact studies for all new buildings and a reduced floor area ratio, which would limit building heights. We must re-evaluate as-of-right policies, and we must do it now.

Olive Freud, president,
Committee for Environmentally Sound Development

new york city


Bothered and Bewildered

I’ve been a subscriber for more than thirty years, and what I most love about The Nation is that the columns and articles respect my intelligence by expecting me to focus and think while I read them. Periodically someone with more aesthetic sense than I decides that the magazine needs to be redesigned. Until now, I’ve not cared much and just go on reading what your writers have to say and not worrying about what typeface or column arrangement they’re saying it in.

The latest “new look” is different. Now when I try to read a column, brightly colored factoids are over in the margin shouting at me to pay attention to them. They’ve crowded the column off the page so I have to go looking somewhere else for its ending. To read a feature article all the way through I have to skip over two or three other articles sharing the pages with it and try to follow it through multiple page jumps. Then I have to back up to find those other articles, if I remember.

I used to read The Nation cover to cover. Now I have to read it back and forth and back and forth. I suspect a hostile and covert takeover. Why else would you try so hard to distract me from what you have to say? Sometimes, despite my best efforts, it works.

Tim Joseph
ithaca, n.y.

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x