Italy’s Olive Tree

Italy’s Olive Tree

Who would have guessed a few years ago that Italy’s Communists, converted or otherwise, would win control of their country’s government with the blessing of the U.S.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Who would have guessed a few years ago that Italy’s Communists, converted or otherwise, would win control of their country’s government with the blessing of the U.S. President, provoking a boom on the Milan stock exchange amid visible signs of approval from the international money markets? All this happened with the April 21 vote, showing how much the former Communists (renamed the Democratic Party of the Left, or P.D.S.), and also the world, have altered. It also suggested that, so far rebuffed in efforts to follow the U.S. example by cutting the cost of the welfare state, the Western European establishment may be toying with new ideas.

There are real reasons for rejoicing over the results of the general election, and the main one is that the worst has not happened. Silvio Berlusconi, the TV tycoon turned triumphantly into a Prime Minister two years ago, did not stage a comeback on this occasion, and his chief partner, the smooth neo-Fascist with a human face, 44-year-old Gianfranco Fini, suffered a serious setback in his rise, the 15.7 percent of the vote gained by his National Alliance falling very short of expectations. Their combined failure insured the success of the Olive Tree, or Ulivo, the center-left coalition nominally headed by Romano Prodi, an earnest and uncharismatic professor of economics, but actually dominated by the P.D.S., which opted for total conversion to capitalism and is now led by Massima D’Alema. On its own, Ulivo cannot govern, but it commands an absolute majority in both chambers together with its rival and ally, the other splinter from the C.P., the hard-line Rifondazione Comunista. Its leader, Fausto Bertinotti, has made it plain that his party will give the government full backing–and submit it to popular pressure.

While symbolically significant, the victory of the left is hardly overwhelming. There was no “landslide.” Only Rifondazione–whose share of the vote climbed to nearly 9 percent–made substantial progress. The left won because of defections from the opposite camp. Two years ago Berlusconi could rely on an alliance with the narrow, nationalist Northern League of Umberto Bossi. This time Bossi stood on his own and, appealing to the selfish patriotism of the rich northern regions, did better than anybody thought he would, capturing 10 percent of the national vote with candidates in only one-third of the country.

The other thing to keep in mind is that the victorious left is far from radical. Its prospective Prime Minister, Prodi, a former Christian Democrat, is no more than a mild reformer; To see how far the coalition has moved to the right, one need only mention the new member recruited just before the election; outgoing Prime Minister Lambert0 Dini. His career speaks for itself: For years a high-level official of the International Monetary Fund, this former deputy governor of the Bank of Italy was the Finance Minister of–Sr. Berlusconi. And, judging by their first pronouncements since victory, the leaders of Ulivo seem closer to the banker Dini than to the Communist Bertinotti.

That such a key figure of the financial establishment as Dini should have chosen to join the left, that its victory was hailed by a 5 percent rise in the share index and a climb of the lira, hints at the import of this experiment; whose significance spreads beyond Italy’s frontiers. For several years now, the governments of Western Europe have been told by international advisers that their countries can no longer afford the social “luxuries” to which they have grown accustomed in the period of postwar prosperity. But attempts to attack the welfare state–by Berlusconi in 1994 and the French government last winter–have so far met with a passionate response.

The question is whether the new Italian government, with a parliamentary majority, the good will reserved for a newcomer and the sympathy of the labor unions, can reform the system and preserve its support–or whether, bound to financial orthodoxy by a determination to stick to the rules of European integration, the country will be led to bitter disappointment. It may seem churlish at this point, when the left finally enters the corridors of power and its supporters celebrate in the piazzas of Rome and Bologna, to see also the seeds of defeat. Alas, there are precedents, and the consequences of another left-wing bankruptcy could be disastrous in a country where even today a neo-Fascist gets 15 percent of the vote and a xenophobe another 10 percent. The new period of transition and movement in Western Europe bears serious risks along with great opportunities.

Support independent journalism that exposes oligarchs and profiteers


Donald Trump’s cruel and chaotic second term is just getting started. In his first month back in office, Trump and his lackey Elon Musk (or is it the other way around?) have proven that nothing is safe from sacrifice at the altar of unchecked power and riches.

Only robust independent journalism can cut through the noise and offer clear-eyed reporting and analysis based on principle and conscience. That’s what The Nation has done for 160 years and that’s what we’re doing now.

Our independent journalism doesn’t allow injustice to go unnoticed or unchallenged—nor will we abandon hope for a better world. Our writers, editors, and fact-checkers are working relentlessly to keep you informed and empowered when so much of the media fails to do so out of credulity, fear, or fealty.

The Nation has seen unprecedented times before. We draw strength and guidance from our history of principled progressive journalism in times of crisis, and we are committed to continuing this legacy today.

We’re aiming to raise $25,000 during our Spring Fundraising Campaign to ensure that we have the resources to expose the oligarchs and profiteers attempting to loot our republic. Stand for bold independent journalism and donate to support The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel

Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x