Did the World’s Largest Protests Leave a Legacy?

Did the World’s Largest Protests Leave a Legacy?

Did the World’s Largest Protests Leave a Legacy?

A new film explores the mobilizations against the Iraq war, and what current protests learned from them.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

In 1819, when British troops fired fired on protesters demanding the right to vote and against famine in Manchester, poet Percy Bysshe Shelley responded with stanza after stanza excoriating the courts, the cavalry, and the king, but he reserved the closing of his poem for a paean to the people:

“Rise Like Lions after Slumber / In unvanquishable number / Shake your chains to earth like dew / Which in sleep had fallen on you / Ye are many—they are few.”

It’s that last line that Iranian-born filmmaker Amir Amirani borrows for his moving documentary about the worldwide demonstrations against the Iraq war on February 15, 2003. We Are Many tells the inside story of the day that millions of people took to the streets to say no to war, in over 800 cities, 72 countries, and even in Antarctica.

Robbie Lieben, a former science support technician at the McMurdo Research Station recalls how that last one happened. “I had a subscription to The Nation.” In a column, he read that there were to be demonstrations worldwide, including in Antarctica. “We can’t let down the great Alexander Cockburn, so we’re going to have to do something,” he says. Days later, he and 70 of his colleagues bundled themselves up in bright red parkas and sprawled on the ice in the shape of a peace sign. It got Lieben fired. “Even if I’d known, I think I’d have done just the same thing,” he concludes.

We Are Many is full of stirring stories like Lieben’s. From London, to Barcelona, to Cairo, and New York, the film fills in some lesser-known details, for example, about a last-minute peace effort by Virgin CEO Richard Branson to fly Nelson Mandela to Baghdad by private jet in the hope of persuading President Saddam Hussein to leave office. Amirani re-interviews outspoken insiders, including UN weapons inspector Hans Blix and Colin Powell’s chief of staff, Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson, who says bluntly, “We lied to the American people; and I wish I had resigned.”

Amirani does what mainstream media typically don’t: He puts the event in the context of a large historical sweep. “Mainstream media don’t want to know the history of anything,” said the film maker at a screening last year. He traces the origins of February 15 back to the Stop the War Protests in London immediately after 9/11, and the gathering in Florence after the World Social Forum in 2002 where the decision to call a globally coordinated day of protest was apparently taken. Leading lights of the left, from the late Tony Benn to Harry Belafonte, appear next to first-time protesters (Amirani was one of those). “The people will be heard. There will not be a war against Iraq,” rally organizer Leslie Cagan is seen, telling the massive, frozen crowd outside the United Nations.

“Maybe for the first time in history we could actually stop the bad guys from doing something horrendous” Cagan remembers thinking.

More questionably, the film then sweeps forward, from the invasion of Iraq, to the Arab Spring, and the British House of Commons vote against intervention in Syria in 2013. Dashed hopes notwithstanding, “an open mind is hard to close” Amirani told The Laura Flanders Show. Phyllis Bennis, fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies, captures the film’s message, noting that “movements can achieve victory even when they look like defeat.” What grew after 2003, says Bennis, was movement confidence. In Egypt, specifically, the film speaks to activists, who, having mobilized only a tiny anti-war protest on February 15, went on to organize a bigger one, just a month later. “That’s exactly what I was thinking, and others, that if we tripled that number or four times that number, we could take down Mubarak, Hossam el-Hamalawy says.

We’ve certainly seen more globally coordinated demonstrations since 2003, including consecutive “risings” against violence toward women and last year’s climate marches. Unfortunately, the war machine grew too.

It’s hard to feel very perky about the state of the world’s peace movements when there’s so much blood being shed and more war on the horizon. After the so-called Peterloo massacre in Manchester, a movement emerged set on expanding the franchise and repealing anti-labor laws.The Combination of Workmen Act was passed within a decade. Two thousand and three’s massive global mobilization can claim no significant effect on the state, which went to war regardless of public opinion.

“Was there a subsequent discussion about reorganizing the state, a new charter, a new international movement? On the contrary, we’ve seen the intensification of war,” says movement historian Peter Linebaugh. Think of interconnected global communications these days, and you think of killer drones and NSA surveillance.

Nonetheless, musician Damon Albarn is wrong to suggest that after February 15 people stopped demonstrating. They didn’t, and haven’t. The anti-war and anti-austerity movements have certainly grown closer. They’ll be demonstrating with climate-justice activists outside the COP21 meeting in Paris—if French troops don’t stop them.

Believers in taking the long view, that the impact of a mobilization like 2003s is felt over time, get one hell of a boost every time Jeremy Corbyn appears onscreen in We Are Many. Those in the opposition Labour Party who denigrated the power of the Stop the War movement (which Corbyn chaired) did so at their peril. Corbyn, elected as the leader of a newly energized left-wing Labour Party this summer, is a proven activist, who says he would in no circumstances commit the grave international crime of using nuclear weapons, and who’s spoken out against “a cycle of wars and destruction, one after the other after the other.”

We Are Many is in the running for Academy Award nomination. It’s playing in theaters around the country this December.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read, just one of the many incisive, deeply-reported articles we publish daily. Now more than ever, we need fearless journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media.

Throughout this critical election year and a time of media austerity and renewed campus activism and rising labor organizing, independent journalism that gets to the heart of the matter is more critical than ever before. Donate right now and help us hold the powerful accountable, shine a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug, and build a more just and equitable future.

For nearly 160 years, The Nation has stood for truth, justice, and moral clarity. As a reader-supported publication, we are not beholden to the whims of advertisers or a corporate owner. But it does take financial resources to report on stories that may take weeks or months to properly investigate, thoroughly edit and fact-check articles, and get our stories into the hands of readers.

Donate today and stand with us for a better future. Thank you for being a supporter of independent journalism.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x