Democracy Worked for SD Abortion Vote

Democracy Worked for SD Abortion Vote

The electoral process worked for pro-choice advocates in South Dakota, overturning an abortion ban with a grassroots appeal to keep the government out of citizens’ personal lives.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

By a whopping twelve points, voters in South Dakota have defeated “Referred Law Number 6,” a draconian ban on abortions, which would have outlawed the procedure in every instance, except to save the life of the mother. This contest was an important defeat for the grass-roots far-right forces in their quest to overturn Roe v Wade. It also affected other races in the state, costing Republicans a seat in the House of Representatives as well as several state legislators. The campaign was also an important test of pro-choice strategy; could the electoral process–something reproductive rights organizations have often feared–be a better guardian of our rights than the legislature or the courts?

“This has been such a judicially-focused movement,” says Lindsay Roitman, campaign manager of the South Dakota Campaign for Healthy Families, the coalition whose organizing efforts deserves credit for this victory. Taking the abortion ban–which had already been enacted by the legislature, but was not yet in effect–to the voters, she says, was “a huge risk, one that people were questioning even until last week.” The victory is even more impressive given that, as Roitman points out, “this is not just a red state, but a deeply religious state.”

What worked in South Dakota? First, South Dakota pro-choice activists seemed to have paid close attention to their local political culture, and talked about things that mattered to its citizens. “It was not, ‘Our Bodies, Our Choice,’ or ‘Get Your Rosaries Off My Ovaries,'” laughs Roitman. Instead, the Campaign for Healthy Families emphasized a theme that resonated with South Dakotans: the idea that the government should not be interfering in people’s most deeply personal decisions. Nancy Keenan, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, agrees. “I’m from the West, and the values of freedom and privacy really resonate with people.”

Second, good-old-fashioned organizing proved effective. The Campaign for Healthy Families had more than 2,000 volunteers knocking on doors, standing on street corners, talking to their fellow citizens about freedom and privacy. (This in a state whose population is about 800,000, in a contest in which 335,000 people voted.)

In every county in which the campaign had an office, and a grass-roots volunteer operation, the pro-choice forces prevailed. The victory has dramatic implications for the future of the pro-choice movement. “I’m so excited to organize politically on this issue,” says Lindsay Roitman. “It’s fun to talk about this now!”

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x