Prick Up Your Ears

Prick Up Your Ears

How does a fiercely anticorporate musician feel about participating in a corporate entertainment system?

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

How does a fiercely anticorporate musician feel about participating in a corporate entertainment system? “Rage Against the Machine was able to deliver 15 million subversive pieces of plastic across the globe,” responds former Rage guitarist Tom Morello, in the forum convened by rock critic Ann Powers that begins on page 11. The contradictions, tensions and political and artistic ferment that persist in today’s popular music scene are the subject of this special issue, which observes the oft-surprising results when politics and music collide–whether in a mass of grooving Le Tigre fans, amid a tattooed throng of antiabortion Christian punks or in the gold-trimmed Manhattan suite of hip-hop-mogul-turned-reparations-activist Russell Simmons.

While these political currents may not always run in our direction, savvy left-leaning artists are busy reinventing the protest music tradition, often beneath the radar. It’s easy to assume that rap, for example, has been given over to “cocaine-cooking, cartoon-watching, gold-rims-coveting and death-worshiping,” as Jeff Chang writes in his essay here. Listen a little harder, though, and you’ll hear artists in the conscious-rap and neosoul genres who are taking seriously the hip-hop generation’s cliché of “keeping it real,” being true to one’s roots of struggle. While such a commitment may not always require a wholesale rejection of the corporate music world, there are those who continue in that still- righteous punk tradition, exemplified by the cultural project known as Punk Planet, profiled by Ivan Kreilkamp on page 25.

That edgy, countercultural music continues to be made is testament to the spirit of the artists (and the appetite of the fans), who are often at odds with their industry patrons. Indeed, much of this music may never reach your ears. Radio today is more corporate, more conglomerated and more corrupt than at any time in history, as Jenny Toomey discusses on page 28. Waves of deregulation that started in the 1980s and accelerated with the passage of the 1996 Telecommunications Act have made it possible for one corporation to buy as many as eight radio stations in a single market. And in payola-like schemes, the “Big Five” music companies, through third-party promoters, shell out thousands of dollars per song to radio conglomerates in order to insure big hits. Instead of moving to right these wrongs, the FCC, under chairman Michael Powell, is looking for new ways to loosen the rules. But at least one member of Congress is fighting back: Senator Russ Feingold’s Competition in Radio and Concert Industries Act would, among other things, crack down on pay-for-play deals and force an examination of the impact that consolidation of radio ownership has had on culture in America.

The effects of consolidation and deregulation in the music industry are invisible to many, but that’s the point. Without our consent, choice–at the megastore, on the air, in the concert hall–is being dictated by the big companies that manage music. To be sure, they’re still promoting a number of inspired, socially conscious artists–like Bruce Springsteen, Natalie Merchant and Mos Def, in addition to those featured here–and if you turn up the volume, you may hear the politics. With this issue, you’ll know where to listen–inside and outside the industry.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x