Reproductive Freedom

Reproductive Freedom

The Nation reported on Dr. Pendergraft’s troubles in “Abortion on Trial” by Hillary Frey and Miranda Kennedy, June 18, 2001.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

In June 2001, The Nation reported on the case of Dr. James Scott Pendergraft, an African-American abortion provider in Florida who had been convicted on federal charges of attempted extortion. A hero of reproductive rights advocates, who ran five clinics in the state, Pendergraft felt his case had clearly been about abortion, not extortion. The Nation fully agreed.

To recap: After Pendergraft threatened to sue the city of Ocala for inadequate protection of his clinic during a meeting with local officials, the feds accused him of trying to squeeze money out of the county commission, and stuck him with the extortion charge. (see “Abortion on Trial” by Hillary Frey and Miranda Kennedy, June 18, 2001). Facing a predominately white, conservative jury and tricky prosecution, Pendergraft was found guilty and sentenced to forty-six months in a federal penitentiary in January 2001.

Pendergraft appealed his conviction, and in February of this year he was released from prison after serving seven months, pending a decision on his appeal from the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Then on July 16, Judges Gerald Bard Tjoflat, Emmett Cox and Paul Roney announced their final verdict: Pendergraft’s convictions were completely overturned and all charges were dismissed. “The right of citizens to petition their government for the redress of grievances is fundamental to our constitutional structure,” Cox wrote for the appeal panel. “A threat to file suit against a government, then, cannot be ‘wrongful’ in itself.”

Dr. Pendergraft is now back at work in his Florida clinics. This is a significant victory for all those who believe in choice for women.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x