July 3, 2025

People Want Climate Action. This Data Shows It.

It’s an extraordinary popular mandate that extends across partisan divides and national borders.

Mark Hertsgaard
Amsterdam climate protest

Protesters in Amsterdam demanding better climate policy, March 25, 2022.


(Romy Arroyo Fernandez / Getty)

When The Guardian, Agence France-Presse, and dozens more of the world’s leading news organizations began reporting the 89 percent story in April, it was because new peer-reviewed science had affirmed a potentially game-changing fact: Eighty to 89 percent of the world’s people think their governments should “do more” to tackle climate change. At a time when many elections are decided by a tiny margin and a 60 percent result is routinely labeled a “landslide,” this 80 to 89 percent tally represents an extraordinary popular mandate that extends across partisan divides and national borders. And it runs counter to most media narratives about climate change, which is that it’s a deeply polarized issue, evenly split.

More evidence of this popular mandate keeps emerging. This week, the European Commission released the latest issue of the Eurobarometer, which has been surveying the beliefs of European Union residents since the EU’s founding in 1993. Across the EU’s 27 member states, 85 percent of people said climate change is “a serious problem” and tackling it “should be a priority.” Two out of three people (67 percent) said their national government was “not doing enough.” The survey also contradicted the notion that, despite such stated support, climate is not a priority for voters. People in most EU countries ranked climate change among the top three problems facing humanity—tied with “the economic situation” and trailing only “armed conflict” and “poverty.”

Earlier in June, still more evidence came from the firm Dynata, which does market research for private and public sector clients. Commissioned by the nonprofits Oxfam International and Greenpeace International, the survey gathered opinions from 13 countries across the world’s biggest economies and the Global South. Dynata too found that eight out of 10 people are disappointed with their government’s response to climate change. The specific wording of Dynata’s questions put an extra twist on that popular discontent: Three out of four people (77 percent) said they’d be “more willing to support a political candidate who prioritizes taxing the super-rich and polluting companies like oil, gas, and coal companies.” 

If climate change can, wrongly, seem like a polarized issue, it’s because it is somewhat polarizing in the US, which wields outsized influence on the global climate discourse. A survey of 23 countries representing 70 percent of the world’s population and conducted by the nonprofit Potential Energy in collaboration with the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication found that 71 percent of people agreed with the statement “I support immediate action by the government to address climate change.” That percentage drops to 61 percent in the US, which has “four times the polarization of the average country.”

As the next phase of Covering Climate Now’s 89 Percent Project rolls out in the coming weeks, these findings invite journalists everywhere to recognize the overwhelming silent majority of people who want action, even as political leaders at COP30 and beyond will be making life-and-death decisions about the future trajectory of climate change. As we approach this opportunity, here’s one last data point from the Eurobarometer survey: “Just over half (52 percent) of EU citizens don’t think the traditional media from their country provides clear information on climate change and its causes and impacts.” New data is telling us it’s time for that to change.

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Mark Hertsgaard

Mark Hertsgaard is the environment correspondent of The Nation and the executive director of the global media collaboration Covering Climate Now. His new book is Big Red’s Mercy:  The Shooting of Deborah Cotton and A Story of Race in America.

More from The Nation

The New York Times Building

Why Aren’t Newsrooms Covering This AI Speech? Why Aren’t Newsrooms Covering This AI Speech?

A.G. Sulzberger urges the media to unite and fight back.

Mark Hertsgaard

Aerial view of the Mexico City Stadium two days before the start of the 2026 World Cup on June 9, 2026, in Mexico City, Mexico.

The Hottest World Cup in History The Hottest World Cup in History

The World Cup is not just a sports story. It’s a climate one, too.

Mark Hertsgaard

The Knife Edge trail, not far from the Maine’s North Woods, which shaped Henry David Thoreau’s ideas about nature.

How America Became the Progenitor of Environmentalism How America Became the Progenitor of Environmentalism

From Indigenous practices to the Green New Deal, our country has always focused on prioritizing our planet.

Feature / Bill McKibben

The ConocoPhillips Oil Refinery is seen in Wilmington, California, on April 11, 2026.

The Oil Era Is Ending The Oil Era Is Ending

Is the Iran war a death knell for America’s oil hegemony?

Mark Hertsgaard

Passengers watch as unseen health personnel assists patients onto a boat from the cruise ship MV Hondius, while stationary off the port of Praia, the capital of Cape Verde, on May 6, 2026. Evacuations were taking place because of a deadly outbreak of hantavirus.

The Hantavirus Is Also a Climate Warning The Hantavirus Is Also a Climate Warning

Higher temperatures, like this coming summer’s, bring more infectious diseases.

Mark Hertsgaard

A transport helicopter of the Dutch Royal Air Force carrying a water bucket for extinguishing wildfires in nature, loads water into the bucket to put out a wildfire in the Veluwe nature reserve on April 29, 2026.

As Global Drought Deepens—Climate Change Kills by a Thousand Cuts As Global Drought Deepens—Climate Change Kills by a Thousand Cuts

Like climate change in general, drought acts as a “threat multiplier,” and making the drought-climate connection helps audience grasp its wide-ranging impacts.

David Dickson