Politics / June 24, 2025

The Math That Gave Us Trump

The party that built the New Deal now manages the raw deal. But there’s hope.

Corbin Trent
Bryan Scalia of Enfield, foreground, shouts out while on the picket line with other members of machinist local 1746 picket on day two of the machinist union strike on Tuesday, May 5, 2025, in front of Pratt &Whitney plant on Main Street in East Hartford.(Jim Michaud / Connecticut Post via Getty Images)

We’re watching Marines on the streets of LA after Trump’s immigration raids ICE running wild. National Guard mobilizing. Elected officials are getting handcuffed. Worse still, we are sleepwalking into war with Iran. The “opposition party,” Democrats, can’t figure out why they keep losing to a fascist game show host.

The answer is math. When a factory closes 100 jobs, it kills 844 total. That’s not a guess. That’s the Economic Policy Institute’s number for durable manufacturing. Every manufacturing job creates 7.4 additional jobs—machine shops, truckers, diners, suppliers, you name it. Retail? You lose 100 retail jobs, you lose just 222, one-fifth the impact. You can see the numbers for yourself in the table here.

I watched this multiplier destroy East Tennessee when NAFTA killed my furniture component factory. We didn’t just lose our jobs. The machine shops died. The truckers lost contracts. The diners lost customers. For every worker I laid off, seven more got destroyed.

Far too many Democrats look at this carnage and shrug. Manufacturing isn’t coming back, they say. The Chicago School says it’s inefficient. The future is services. They’d rather fund another war than rebuild a factory. They’d rather bail out banks than build anything.

And working-class voters abandoned the Wall Street Dems in droves. Not just white voters anymore. Latino workers, who were once solid Democrats, flipped to Trump. Black working-class voters are staying home or switching sides. The Democratic Party is becoming the party of college-educated professionals, while everyone who builds and makes and fixes things runs for the exits.

Some Democrats are starting to see an opening here. Melissa Morales runs Somos Votantes, a Democratic-leaning Latino group that’s been tracking how Trump’s doing with Latino voters. Their latest polling shows his support slipping, and Morales thinks she knows why.

“These numbers tell a pretty clear story—his economic credibility is eroding fast, and that’s a huge problem for him,” Morales said. She pointed out that Trump’s gains with Latino voters in the first place were mostly built on his promises to fix the economy. If that trust is breaking down, those gains could disappear just as quickly.

The opening is real. Democrats could win back these voters. But they won’t, because seizing this opportunity would require them to abandon the very ideology that defines them.

That ideology is neoliberalism, and it’s infected the leadership of the Democratic Party like a parasitic brain worm. It makes them incapable of responding to what people actually need. When voters say they want manufacturing jobs back, Democrats treat them like ungrateful children who don’t understand economics. When communities beg for investment in production, Democrats lecture them about comparative advantage while writing checks to defense contractors.

Americans want change. Big change.

The Nation Weekly

Fridays. A weekly digest of the best of our coverage.
By signing up, you confirm that you are over the age of 16 and agree to receive occasional promotional offers for programs that support The Nation’s journalism. You may unsubscribe or adjust your preferences at any time. You can read our Privacy Policy here.

We are told that we live in the richest nation in history, and sure, America has a lot of wealth, but more than 60 percent of it is held by the top 10 percent. The rest of us watch our towns die by the numbers while Democratic leaders wonder why their “save democracy” message doesn’t land with people who work for a living. You can’t save democracy when you’re actively destroying the communities that democracy is supposed to serve.

Trump doesn’t know shit about manufacturing. But he knows enough to pretend he cares. He speaks to the rage of people who’ve been told their desire to make things is irrational. But so many Democrats can’t even fake it. They’re too busy looking at GDP figures and the market to imagine anyone would want change.

Working-class voters of every race understand the math. They’ve watched factories close in Black neighborhoods in Detroit, Latino communities in California, and white towns in Ohio. The destruction doesn’t discriminate. A lost factory kills jobs, whether you’re Black, brown, or white. The “return to the status quo” Democrats are the only ones who don’t seem to understand.

And don’t tell me that “it’s all robots now.” If manufacturing jobs are getting more productive—if every worker in that industry is creating more value for the whole economy—that’s even more reason those jobs need to be here, not overseas. Every time you automate a plant in America, that multiplier effect grows. If we let those jobs go to China or Germany, we’re not just losing jobs—we’re losing leverage, losing the ability to trade for what we need, losing the future. The dollar’s dominance isn’t guaranteed forever. Eventually, you need to have something people want to trade for. If we don’t make things, we’re just hoping the world keeps taking our IOUs.

Yeah, there’s been a lot of noise about the Inflation Reduction Act, the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, and CHIPS. But they are falling short.

These laws are already being rolled back or slow-walked by the Trump administration. The rollout is too slow for dying towns. There’s no real direction or accountability to ensure that things are actually being built here, by us, for us. And they don’t get that manufacturing is an ecosystem. You can’t pick and choose a few “smart” parts and outsource the rest. You need the entire ecosystem—from R&D and education to local suppliers, foundational manufacturing capabilities, skilled trades, and infrastructure—to support high-tech manufacturing. You can’t just say, “We’re gonna make an advanced microprocessor.” It don’t work that way.

The Democratic Party’s consultants keep telling us to moderate on culture-war stuff, but never on the economic ideas that actually matter—breaking with neoliberal ideology, reinvesting in real industry, rebuilding the backbone of America, and doing it fast.

Some Democrats get it. When Ro Khanna called out Schumer, he showed what’s possible. But most of them are too infected by the neoliberal brain worm to see straight. They think wanting to manufacture things is nostalgia.

We’re heading toward war while our communities crumble. We’re building a police state while our industrial base rots. Democrats keep picking the wrong side because they’ve convinced themselves that making things doesn’t matter, that financial engineering is the same as real engineering, that you can run a country on services and debt.

The party that once represented workers now represents consultants and Wall Street. The party that built the New Deal now manages the Raw Deal. And working people know it. Every community that depends—or once did—on making things for a living is walking away from a party that walked away from them first.

Until Democrats understand this equation, they’ll keep losing. They’ll keep wondering why people vote against their “interests” when they can’t even identify what those interests are. They’ll keep funding wars instead of factories, choosing finance over production, treating the desire to make things as some primitive urge we should have evolved past.

One factory job gives us 8.4 total jobs. That math gave us Trump. Ignoring it will give us worse.

My call to action? Share this piece. Back amazing candidates like Saikat Chakrabarti, who’s running against Nancy Pelosi. Help lift up voices calling bullshit on this failed consensus. Currently, the conversation is dominated by think tanks and operatives who don’t know what a wrench feels like. We need people who understand that political power comes from economic power. Economic power comes from making things.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Corbin Trent

Corbin Trent is an Appalachian factory owner turned political strategist, cofounder of Justice Democrats, and former communications director for Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. He writes about rebuilding America at AmericasUndoing.com.

More from The Nation

Trump’s “Warrior Dividend”  Might Be His Scariest Idea Yet

Trump’s “Warrior Dividend” Might Be His Scariest Idea Yet Trump’s “Warrior Dividend” Might Be His Scariest Idea Yet

This week’s “Elie v. US” explores the authoritarian threat beneath Trump’s bonuses for military families. Plus, a case for getting rid of the Second Amendment.

Elie Mystal

How Do We See Hegseth?

How Do We See Hegseth? How Do We See Hegseth?

Surf's up!

Steve Brodner

HUD Is Refusing to Enforce Anti-Discrimination Law—and Won’t Let Anyone Else Do It, Either

HUD Is Refusing to Enforce Anti-Discrimination Law—and Won’t Let Anyone Else Do It, Either HUD Is Refusing to Enforce Anti-Discrimination Law—and Won’t Let Anyone Else Do It, Either

The initial chaos of layoffs has been followed by a concerted effort by the Trump administration to halt the enforcement of the Fair Housing Act.

Bryce Covert

Unleashing AI

Unleashing AI Unleashing AI

Ignoring the dangers, tech companies race forward.

OppArt / Peter Kuper

Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN) walks toward the Capitol on December 10, 2025.

Why Ilhan Omar Makes the Right Lose Its Mind Why Ilhan Omar Makes the Right Lose Its Mind

Trump and his MAGA allies want people like Omar to vanish from this country—and they hate her for refusing to do so.

Isi Baehr-Breen

Brad Lander on What It Takes to Win as a Progressive

Brad Lander on What It Takes to Win as a Progressive Brad Lander on What It Takes to Win as a Progressive

The outgoing New York City comptroller discusses governing on the left, his run for Congress, and why housing and affordability should define the next Democratic fight.

Q&A / Bhaskar Sunkara