Letters From the September 6/13, 2021, Issue

Letters From the September 6/13, 2021, Issue

Letters From the September 6/13, 2021, Issue

The good place… Overconsumed…

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

The Good Place

Imagine! An entire special double issue on utopia [“This Way to Utopia: Dreams of a Better World,” July 26/Aug. 2] without a single mention of the United Nations’ 17 Sustainable Development Goals.
Michael Marien
lafayette, n.y.

One may come away from Jeet Heer’s essay “Utopia Allows Us to Dream Together” with the impression that feminist utopian thinking began in the 1960s and ’70s, and that women did not contribute to the great period of utopianism at the turn of the 20th century. On the contrary, writers such as the South African–born Olive Schreiner (in Dreams, 1890), the Bengali Muslim Rokeya Hossain (in Sultana’s Dream, 1905), and the American Charlotte Perkins Gilman (in Herland, 1915) created influential, inspiring visions of gender-equal societies, and to overlook their importance now is simply wrong.
Margaret D. Stetz
Professor of Women’s Studies,
University of Delaware

newark, del.

I found it remarkable that the discussion of several of the great utopian writings overlooked the one that was published in Philadelphia in 1787. This one was significantly different from the others in that it contained a description of the process by which its shortcomings could be corrected. Unlike all other utopian ideas, the US Constitution acknowledged its awareness of its own necessity for change, if not in the fundamentals of its theory, then at least in its necessary adaptation to unanticipated threats. Those fundamentals included the crazy idea that people are free to wish as they please, act on their wishes, and alter their course when necessary.
Franklin Lonzo Dixon Jr.
madison, va.

Overconsumed

Re “A Small World,” by Katha Pollitt [July 12/19]: In the struggle for a clean and sustainable environment, people who want to have more children are not the enemy. Overpopulation is not the issue.

The problem is how people in industrialized societies treat the environment—consumption of fossil fuels, horrific agricultural practices, plastic wrapped around everything. To be clear: Wealthy people, corporations, and a weak-kneed regulatory structure deserve the most blame for the perceived lack of resources. More important, concerns about so-called overpopulation nearly always end with forcing contraceptives on women of color. In this way, overpopulation arguments not only fail to address the root causes of environmental despair and the inequitable distribution of resources, they support eugenics. Let’s not make these arguments as progressives.

Erin Matson
Executive Director,
Reproaction

washington, d.c.

Correction

Cripping Utopia to Save It,” by s.e. smith [July 26/Aug. 2], misquoted Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. as writing in his Buck v. Bell decision that “three generations of idiots are enough.” He actually wrote that “three generations of imbeciles are enough.”

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x