Letters From the December 28, 2020/January 4, 2021, Issue

Letters From the December 28, 2020/January 4, 2021, Issue

Letters From the December 28, 2020/January 4, 2021, Issue

No great mystery… Supreme obstacle… Paradise lost…

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

No Great Mystery

Re “Fallujah’s Children” by Laura Gottesdiener [November 16/23]: Iraq has been in a state of never-ending war since 1990 (or 1980, if one includes the Iran-Iraq War), suffering from all the attending, well-documented dire consequences, including a seriously degraded, toxic environment. There are books and articles too numerous to mention on this topic, including Barry Sanders’s The Green Zone (2009). In The Great War for Civilisation (2005), Robert Fisk wrote, “There was one final scourge to be visited upon the Iraqi people, however, a foul cocktail in which both our gunfire and our sanctions played an intimate, horrific role, one that would contaminate Iraqis for years to come, perhaps for generations…. It manifested itself in abscesses, in massive tumours, in gangrene, internal bleeding and child mastectomies and shrunken heads and deformities and thousands of tiny graves.”

Given this history, why focus on one city and why call the suffering in Fallujah “the greatest medical mystery of the Iraq War”? Everyone knows and common sense tells us that war is not healthy for children and other living things. We know that, but those in power and in powerful positions, including in the media, choose to ignore it. There is no mystery, and alas, the suffering is not limited to children in one city in Iraq.

Claudia Lefko

Supreme Obstacle

Re “Unpack the Court” [D.D. Guttenplan, November 16/23]: There are two potential problems in the Constitution that the founders were aware of—the domination of the majority over a minority and, even more dangerous, the domination of a minority over the majority. We are living with the latter problem because of the rise of the corporate and hyperwealthy class. The corporate-​friendly Supreme Court, including the liberal justices, is an obstacle to democratic progress.

In addition, let’s stop the liberal obsession with vetting justices solely on their views on abortion. We should examine their corporate philosophies as well. Before Amy Coney Barrett’s arrival, four of the eight justices were products of Harvard, and four were from Yale. Surely we can find expert legal talent elsewhere.

As well as the emperor, it is vital that we also see that the Supreme Court is without clothes.

Victor Sciamarelli

Paradise Lost

Re Mike Davis’s “Fire in the Anthropocene” [November 2/9], on California’s blazes and the other consequences of climate change: Beautifully, achingly, terrifyingly written. I had been unaware the Cima Dome burned. I drove through it a year ago, and it was so lovely, I could not stop taking photographs. As long as the population continues to increase in Southern California, the environment (the biome, the water resources, the land itself) will be a burnt sacrifice.
Robert Borneman

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

x