Activism / July 24, 2025

A New Wave of Protests Confronts Zelensky’s Move to Rein in Anti‑Corruption Agencies


These are the largest since the Russian invasion of 2022—and seem poised to continue.

Jared Goyette
Demonstrators chant outside Kyiv’s Ivan Franko National Drama Theater on July 23, 2025, holding cardboard placards that read “Корупція аплодує” (“Corruption Applauds”) and “Вето на 12444” (“Veto Bill 12444”) to protest new legislation placing Ukraine’s anti‑corruption agencies under presidential control.
Demonstrators chant outside Kyiv’s Ivan Franko National Drama Theater on July 23, 2025, holding cardboard placards that read “Корупція аплодує” (“Corruption Applauds”) and “Вето на 12444” (“Veto Bill 12444”) to protest new legislation placing Ukraine’s anti‑corruption agencies under presidential control.(Oleksandra Diachenko for The Nation)

Kyiv, Ukraine—A new protest movement may have taken shape in Ukraine on Tuesday night, when thousands of mostly twentysomething demonstrators packed the square outside Kyiv’s Ivan Franko National Drama Theater—within sight of the Presidential Office on Bankova Street—to condemn President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s signature on a law that strips the National Anti‑Corruption Bureau (NABU) and the Special Anti‑Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (SAP) of their independence by placing both under the prosecutor general, a post he appoints.

The protests, held simultaneously in other large cities—Lviv, Dnipro, Odesa, and even Sumy, which lies close to the front line and faces daily strikes—were the largest since Russia’s full‑scale invasion in 2022 and appear poised to continue. For supporters, what’s at stake is clear: Whether a nation fighting for survival can also defend the hard‑won democratic reforms achieved after the 2014 Revolution of Dignity—and with them, the country’s hopes for European Union membership. Equally at issue is the public’s trust that wartime sacrifices are underwriting a freer, more accountable state rather than, as critics warn, an emergent authoritarian system serving the president’s inner circle and a powerful elite.

The legislation passed Parliament in a lightning vote earlier that day and was then signed by the president before sundown—a pace critics, including at least one prominent opposition MP, called unprecedented and possibly in violation of parliamentary rules. Crowds began assembling at 8 pm, chanting “Ukraine is not Russia,” “Hands off NABU,” and “Why the fuck do I need a system that works against me? (“Нахуя мені система що працює проти мене”) beneath the theater’s colonnade.

“After the Maidan Revolution—Ukraine’s Revolution of Dignity—there were 11 years of reforms aimed at fighting corruption,” said Yana Prots, a 22‑year‑old media worker. “Now, in just a few hours…our government wants to roll those changes back. That’s why I’m here: to defend the anti‑corruption agencies and to protest this outrageous move.” Prots still holds out hope that Zelenskyy will reverse his decision. “We want a democratic society and independent anti‑corruption agencies,” she added.

There are signs the pressure is already working. At a meeting with top law‑enforcement officials on Wednesday, following the protests, Zelenskyy said, “We all hear what society is saying,” and promised to announce a new anti‑corruption plan within two weeks, according to the Kyiv Independent.

Earlier, he defended the bill in his nightly address, arguing that recent security‑service raids exposed “Russian influence” inside the National Anti‑Corruption Bureau. NABU and SAPO will keep investigating cases, he said, but placing them under the prosecutor general will ensure “real accountability” and unblock high‑value probes that have “lain dormant for years.” The overhaul, Zelenskyy added, is meant to deliver “more justice” in wartime, not to hobble reform. He did not address criticism that the prosecutor general now has sole authority to end investigations against high‑ranking officials.

The Nation Weekly

Fridays. A weekly digest of the best of our coverage.
By signing up, you confirm that you are over the age of 16 and agree to receive occasional promotional offers for programs that support The Nation’s journalism. You may unsubscribe or adjust your preferences at any time. You can read our Privacy Policy here.

The vote came amid growing concerns about authoritarian tendencies in the Zelenskyy administration and what some saw as a crackdown on critics. On July 11, the State Bureau of Investigation searched the Kyiv apartment of one of Ukraine’s most prominent anti-corruption activists, Vitaliy Shabunin, head of the Anti-Corruption Action Center, and charged him with draft evasion and fraud—allegations denounced by civil society groups as political payback for his scrutiny of presidential allies.

Days later, the SBU carried out searches at NABU’s headquarters and detained two detectives it alleged were collaborating with Russian operatives, prompting Transparency International to warn that the sweep threatened the independence of Ukraine’s anti‑graft system, according to Reuters.

The call for the Kyiv protest came from viral Twitter and Facebook posts by Dmytro Koziatynskyi, a veteran and combat medic. He urged residents to defend the anti‑corruption system built since Maidan and “not let the country slip back to Yanukovych times.” At the square, telltale signs of Ukrainian’s experience with protest were visible: a water station was set up to keep people hydrated on a humid summer night. One man brought a guitar to occupancy the chants, and a woman kept time with a tambourine.

Soldiers dotted the crowd, many wearing masks and shying away from interviews.

For Roman, a soldier who, in his youth, marched in both the 2004 Orange Revolution and the 2013–14 Maidan uprising, the scene carried bitter echoes. “When we won the 2004 Maidan, we ended up in a long, bogged‑down political mess that wiped out the chance we had,” he said, adding that he feared people would forget the lessons of Ukraine’s recent past.

Younger voices insisted they had not. Varvara, 22, an IT specialist, drew a direct line to the 2014 protests: “Every new administration risks sliding back into old ways—trying to shut us up. They must know that won’t work anymore.”

Nearby, Valentin, 24, a charitable‑foundation worker, held a handwritten sign reading “EU Means Independent NABU.” “Everyone here knows NABU isn’t perfect,” he said, “yet gutting its powers would stall, even reverse, our progress toward the European Union. Nobody wants that.”

Above the crowd waved a lone “Don’t Tread on Me” flag, hoisted by Bogdan, 23. “We’re told we’re moving toward freedom and the EU,” he said, “but power is being concentrated in an unelected presidential office.… Zelenskyy promised liberty and delivered the opposite—pushing us toward a Belarus‑ or Russia‑style regime.”

As curfew approached, voices rose in another chorus of the national anthem. Stefaniya, 21, a Kyiv barista attending her first demonstration, summed up the mood: “Leaders act as though they can do anything they want and nothing will stop them. We came to show them people do care—we won’t just sit with our arms folded.”

And so far, she seems right. The following night, Wednesday, the protest more than doubled in size, as thousands more young Ukrainians joined their compatriots in front of the President’s Office, with the crowd spelling into side streets, and the atmosphere growing festive, yet remaining defiant. “Corruption is destroying!” they chanted.

Jared Goyette

Jared Goyette is the English-language editor of The Ukrainians Media and a freelancer based in Kyiv.

More from The Nation

Donald Trump and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer pose for a photo.

Europe Signs Up for More Humiliation by Trump Europe Signs Up for More Humiliation by Trump

As the post–Cold War order cracks up, the fault lines don’t just run through the Atlantic, but Europe itself. 

David Broder

President Donald Trump hosts a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders at the White House on August 18, 2025.

European Cowardice Is Empowering Trump’s New Imperialism European Cowardice Is Empowering Trump’s New Imperialism

NATO allies don’t want to confront Trump’s aggression. But they may ultimately not have a choice.

Jeet Heer

UK newspaper front pages display stories on the capture and arrest of President Nicolas Maduro from Venezuela in a newsagent shop, on January 4, 2026, in Somerset, England.

“Take the Oil” “Take the Oil”

Trump’s Venezuelan petroleum fantasies.

Michael T. Klare

A billboard depicting symbolic images of former commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Quds Force Maj. Gen. Qassem Soleimani and Iranian athletes is hung on a state building in downtown Tehran, Iran, on January 6, 2026.

The Assassination That Paved the Way for Trump’s Venezuela Attack The Assassination That Paved the Way for Trump’s Venezuela Attack

How Trump’s illegal 2020 killing of Qassem Soleimani—and the West’s indifferent response—laid the groundwork for the brazen abduction of Nicolás Maduro.

Séamus Malekafzali

Cypriano Castro (1858–1924) was president from 1902 until he was deposed in 1908. He died in exile.

Before There Was Nicolás Maduro, There Was Cipriano Castro Before There Was Nicolás Maduro, There Was Cipriano Castro

Behind today’s headlines is a history of imperial outrage—including a Philadelphia contract man who wreaked havoc in early-20th-century Venezuela and helped oust a president.

Greg Grandin

President Donald Trump, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, and CIA Director John Ratcliffe monitor the US military assault on Venezuela from Trump's Mar-a-Lago Club.

The US Is a Rogue State That Deserves to Be Sanctioned The US Is a Rogue State That Deserves to Be Sanctioned

Where is the international outrage over the US assault on Venezuela and kidnapping of Maduro?

Elie Mystal