Activism / October 13, 2025

Renaming Columbus Day Was Never the End Goal

Don’t let fights over names distract you from the real fights over Indigenous land, sovereignty, and rights.

Joseph Lee
Members of Indigenous People’s Day New York City Committee held a Circle of Belonging in Columbus Circle on June 30, 2020.(Byron Smith / Getty Images)

Every year, my tribe—the Aquinnah Wampanoag—celebrates Cranberry Day on the second Tuesday in October. It’s one of our most important gatherings, when the tribe comes together to pick wild cranberries in the bogs by the beach. Starting early in the morning, we spread out across the squelchy bogs, steadily filling buckets and baskets with the firm, red berries. I grew up away from our homelands on Martha’s Vineyard, but my family always made a trip back to the island for Cranberry Day.

The holiday fell the day after Columbus Day, meaning we could have a four-day weekend to spend on the island, but the juxtaposition of those two days always seemed ironic to me. When many states and cities began to observe Indigenous Peoples’ Day instead of Columbus Day, not much changed for us. We still spend the day after like countless generations of Wampanoags before us have—picking cranberries and catching up around a fire. There is nothing that can replace those hours reconnecting with one another, the land, and our traditions.

But as the popularity of Indigenous Peoples’ Day has waxed and waned, and with the Trump administration’s assaults on “DEI” practices like renaming holidays and places, it’s worth thinking about what the value of a day called Indigenous Peoples’ Day really is.

Joe Biden was the first president to observe Indigenous Peoples’ Day, although he did not make it a federal holiday. This year, Trump signed a proclamation for Columbus Day, calling Christopher Columbus the “original American hero.” The proclamation also says, “Columbus has been a prime target of a vicious and merciless campaign to erase our history, slander our heroes, and attack our heritage.” This spring, Trump had said that he would bring Columbus Day “back from the ashes.” In a similar vein, US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said that he would preserve medals given to perpetrators of the massacre at Wounded Knee.

These actions might seem insignificant compared to the deployment of ICE and the National Guard in cities across the country, but it’s clear that they are important to the administration. On his first day in office, Trump signed an executive order changing the name of Mount Denali back to Mount McKinley, reversing a change Indigenous people had won under President Barack Obama. These actions do matter, because they are part of a larger campaign of white nationalism and colonial erasure that perpetuates the myth that Indigenous people are all gone and American settlers were noble heroes.

But I think we have lost sight of why those name changes were important in the first place. Columbus Day is a celebration of a brutal, genocidal history that the country continues to whitewash. One of the first observances of Indigenous Peoples’ Day in the United States was in Berkeley, California, in 1992 as a protest against the 500th anniversary celebration of Columbus’s infamous voyage. The organizers of that protest knew that we have to acknowledge and understand Columbus’s real legacy not as an unfortunate historical chapter but as part of colonialism’s ongoing project. And amid all the back and forth over names, that project has continued. Across the country, under Democratic and Republican leadership, Indigenous land and rights have been constantly under attack.

As property taxes and the cost of living on Martha’s Vineyard continue to skyrocket, for example, most of our tribe no longer lives on our homelands. Meanwhile, the tribe’s efforts to establish economic opportunity and to make decisions about our homelands have been opposed by many of the same people championing Indigenous Peoples’ Day.

Name changes were real wins for Indigenous communities, but for non-Indigenous people, I think it became too easy to see them as mission accomplished. Changing the name was supposed to be the beginning of a conversation about colonialism and genocide, not the goal itself. If progress can be erased by a decree or a new sign, then the limits of that progress become obvious.

By focusing on the names of holidays and places, rather than the reasons why those names matter, we let the conversation drift away from the more important question: What would it look like to win real change? Taking on this moment requires honesty about what we have achieved and how much left we have to go.

When I talk to people from other tribes across the country, the challenges they talk about are not about names. Those challenges—from preserving Indigenous languages to the US government violating treaty rights—are the direct result of the broader mission of colonialism that Columbus was a part of. That is the work that interested allies can and should learn more about and help with. Changing names can be a stepping stone on the way to building that solidarity, but it cannot be the last step.

When my grandfather was a kid, the cranberry harvest was a longer affair, with the community staying down by the bogs for days. Back then, Martha’s Vineyard was a relatively unknown island, not the exclusive vacation destination it is now seen as. The tribe also did not have federal recognition as a sovereign nation, a status that the tribe fought for years to get, finally achieving it a few years before I was born. Those are the bigger fights—fights over land, sovereignty, and rights—that we can lose sight of when we focus only on names.

I recently published a book that explores, among other things, the complexity of Indigenous identity. At book events, one of the most common questions I am asked by non-Indigenous people is about terminology. People want to know, more than anything, what the right thing to say is—Indian, Native American, or Indigenous. Words matter, of course, but it bothers me that their most urgent concern seems to be using the term that won’t get them in trouble. There are many ways to support Indigenous communities, but they all require actually engaging with and listening to them. The problem with these conversations about language is that they can become sideshows, apart from the deeper political questions. And that’s how most Americans have thought about Indigenous people—as sideshows to the real political struggles.

For many Americans, fall is the only time of year when they think about Indigenous people. Between Indigenous Peoples’ Day, Native American Heritage Month, and Thanksgiving, we are more present this time of year in the American consciousness than any other. People often ask me if my family celebrates Thanksgiving and say they feel conflicted about celebrating the holiday. To be honest, I don’t care, and I find those conversations exhausting. I enjoy having a day off on Thanksgiving and sharing a meal with my family. No one needs my permission to do the same. It doesn’t matter to me how you spend a Thursday in November or the second Monday in October. It matters how you spend the rest of the year.

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Joseph Lee

Joseph Lee is the author of Nothing More of This Land: Community, Power, and the Search for Indigenous Identity.

More from The Nation

The boarding schools Native children were sent to, like this one in Ohio, were little more than brutal detainment camps.

250 Years of Genocide, Theft, and Displacement 250 Years of Genocide, Theft, and Displacement

Natives have nothing to celebrate as the United States stages another sick-making festival of self-congratulation.

Feature / Simon Moya-Smith

The Declaration’s catalog of grievances against King George III sound like Donald Trump’s to-do list.

The Celebration of the Nation's Birth Is Still a Sham The Celebration of the Nation's Birth Is Still a Sham

If America must observe its 250th anniversary, let it be by taking stock of Reconstruction’s unfinished mission.

Feature / Madiba K. Dennie

Gull Island

How Can We Reimagine Higher Education in the Age of Climate Change? How Can We Reimagine Higher Education in the Age of Climate Change?

An interview with the founders of Gull Island Institute.

Books & the Arts / Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins

4 Years After “Dobbs,” How Do We Count the Dead?

4 Years After “Dobbs,” How Do We Count the Dead? 4 Years After “Dobbs,” How Do We Count the Dead?

In the post-Roe world, we know that abortion bans don’t stop safe abortions, but they do kill people.

Amy Littlefield

Thurgood Marshall, the first Black Supreme Court justice, is as important in shaping of the Constiution as its framers.

America Is Due a Third Reconstruction America Is Due a Third Reconstruction

The nation can thank the Supreme Court for its periods of turmoil. It’s time for a new jurisprudence.

Feature / Michele Goodwin

The signing of the US Constitution in 1787, in a painting by Junius Brutus Stearns.

Will America Ever Give White-Man Rights To Everyone Else? Will America Ever Give White-Man Rights To Everyone Else?

If we want to make it another 250 years, the Constitution is going to have to do a lot more than protect individual political and civil rights.

Feature / Elie Mystal