Society / December 12, 2025

Keeping the Police Out of Pregnancy Care

We must be vigilant in keeping law enforcement out of exam rooms.

Lourdes A. Rivera and Dr. Jamila Perritt
(Shutterstock.com)

Imagine you’re pregnant and excited for your new baby—tracking kicks, setting up the crib, picking out names. Then comes sudden, unexpected pain. You lose your pregnancy at home, terrified and bleeding, and you do what you’ve always taught your kids to do in an emergency: you call for help.

The paramedics arrive—and with them, police. The questions come before the care: How far along were you? How long did you wait before calling 911? Did you get regular prenatal care? Were you excited to be pregnant? Have you taken any drugs? Instead of prioritizing your physical and emotional well-being, you’re suddenly facing criminal charges, worried about losing your kids, and trying to find a lawyer you can afford.

Cases like these are not unique. They have been happening across the country in the first two years since Roe v. Wade fell. Pregnancy Justice and our research partners have documented more than 400 prosecutions across 16 states for pregnancy, miscarriage, and abortion—as police and prosecutors, often alerted by hospitals and healthcare workers when someone seeks care, treat medical emergencies as crimes. This is pregnancy criminalization: when someone is charged with a crime because of their behavior during pregnancy, or because of a pregnancy loss, such as miscarriage or stillbirth. These charges are typically not for abortion-specific crimes; in fact, at least for now, most states cannot charge the pregnant person with an abortion-related crime. Instead, prosecutors misuse and misapply various statutes to charge pregnant people with anything from “child” abuse, neglect, or endangerment, to murder, manslaughter, or abuse of a corpse.

Pregnancy criminalization in the United States started long before the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision to overturn Roe, but the guardrails that once existed to protect women from being criminalized for pregnancy loss or abortion are now off. Today, it is a dangerous framework driving these prosecutions, one that aims to treat fertilized eggs, embryos, and fetuses as “persons” with rights, and recasts behavior during pregnancy as a potential crime. In practice, this kind of criminalization falls hardest on low-income, Black, brown, Indigenous, and rural communities—those most at risk of over-policing and a lack of affordable health care or legal counsel.

In many cases, the “evidence” used to prosecute a pregnant person is a positive urine toxicology test or drug screen—often ordered and shared with child welfare authorities and the police without a patient’s knowledge or informed consent. Some positive drug tests are later shown to be false; others are a result of prescribed medications; still others reflect substance use or substance use disorder (SUD). And yet this positive test is often enough to charge a pregnant patient with a felony for allegedly putting their pregnancy at “risk” of potential harm, often resulting in the removal of their other children from their care. It’s why leading medical organizations, including the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American Medical Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics, recommend against the use of drug testing to punish or criminalize people who use drugs during pregnancy.

The application of child abuse or neglect statutes to embryos and fetuses is a slippery and dangerous slope. The practice quickly expands: Any pregnancy loss is treated with suspicion. As this punitive net widens, the actual systems that support the health and well-being of patients and their infants—prenatal care, mental health care, and treatment for SUD—are being stripped away. We are witnessing the gutting of Medicaid, which is worsening maternity care deserts, and the defunding of proven treatment for SUD, which was already insufficient to meet capacity, even as overdose deaths rise among pregnant and postpartum people. If policymakers and legislators were truly interested in improving outcomes for pregnant people and their babies, they would invest in care, not punishment.

Repro Nation

Monthly. A collection of stories, analysis, and resources on the global struggle for reproductive freedom.
By signing up, you confirm that you are over the age of 16 and agree to receive occasional promotional offers for programs that support The Nation’s journalism. You may unsubscribe or adjust your preferences at any time. You can read our Privacy Policy here.

But by participating in nonconsensual drug testing and reporting of those results to government agencies and legal entities, hospitals and clinicians are inviting law enforcement into exam rooms, initiating and facilitating the criminalization and incarceration of pregnant people. Each decision amounts to centering the institution’s needs at the expense of the patients, who are then blamed for not getting pregnancy “right.”

It can be overwhelming to navigate the complicated health care system as a pregnant person, whether giving birth or seeking care for pregnancy loss; the system was designed that way. One powerful way to interrupt this cycle of punishment is by staying alert and informed. We can all help our community members, neighbors, loved ones, and family members by going with them to visits and listening, taking notes, and asking questions with their safety in mind. In the midst of so much political chaos, our most important tool is information about our rights and how to protect those rights. For example, a person can exercise their Fifth Amendment right by refusing to talk to the police without legal representation present. It’s essential not to let unconstitutional threats and actions distract us from demanding that our freedoms be protected.

Here’s the good news: People seeking care and those who want to support them don’t have to do it alone. Clinicians and hospitals have agency too, and organizers around the country are working hard to ensure they know this. Health systems can refuse to allow law enforcement into the exam room, by prohibiting non-required and nonconsensual reporting and by ordering tests to support care rather than to build criminal cases. These strategies work. In New York City, a policy shift like this cut toxicology-only reports to child welfare by 80 percent with no negative impact on infant health outcomes. We can collectively advocate for more cities and states to follow their lead and protect families.

Prosecutors also should state plainly that no one should be criminalized for pregnancy loss, abortion, or substance use and they will refuse to prosecute those who are. Medical education should teach medical trainees about providing patients with health care that is responsive to their needs and supportive of their goals, not making assumptions about what’s “best” for a patient and increasing their risk of criminalization. If people are facing threats of criminalization for their pregnancy outcomes, they can reach out to organizations like Pregnancy Justice to get the legal support they need.

Our goal should be simple: safeguard the health of the pregnant and postpartum person. That commitment improves outcomes for newborns, for patients after pregnancy loss, and for families. But it is going to take all of us. Our personal advocacy for our loved ones, our laws, policies, and medical guidelines must support one premise: No one should be criminalized for being pregnant, however that pregnancy ends.

Lourdes A. Rivera

Lourdes A. Rivera is the president of Pregnancy Justice, a legal nonprofit and advocacy organization that defends pregnant people’s rights.

Dr. Jamila Perritt

Dr. Jamila Perritt is a fellowship trained, board-certified obstetrician and gynecologist and the president and CEO of Physicians for Reproductive Health, a physician-led organization that mobilizes the medical community, educating and organizing providers, using medicine and science to advance access to reproductive healthcare for all people.

More from The Nation

Flowers are left at a makeshift memorial in the area where Alex Pretti was shot dead a day earlier by federal immigration agents in Minneapolis, Minnesota, on January 25, 2026.

Alex Pretti Was a Good Man at a Time of Great Evil Alex Pretti Was a Good Man at a Time of Great Evil

The 37-year-old ICU nurse was killed helping another ICE victim. We must honor his sacrifice.

Joan Walsh

Protesters clash with law enforcement in Minneapolis on January 24, 2026, after federal agents shot and killed a man—the second time one has shot dead a Minnesotan this month.

Minneapolis Is an “Insurrection” of Trump’s Own Making Minneapolis Is an “Insurrection” of Trump’s Own Making

The city has become ground zero for the Trump administration’s war on immigrants and the growing resistance to it.

Alyssa Oursler

Why I Didn’t Report My Rape

Why I Didn’t Report My Rape Why I Didn’t Report My Rape

In 2021, six men sexually assaulted me in a Las Vegas hotel room. Something more than abolitionism prevented me from reporting the crime.

Anna Krauthamer

Left: Graham Granger after his arraignment outside the court building. Right: The art exhibit, made with the help of AI, by Nick Dwyer.

Meet the Alaska Student Arrested for Eating an AI Art Exhibit Meet the Alaska Student Arrested for Eating an AI Art Exhibit

A conversation with Graham Granger, whose combination of protest and performance art spread beyond campus. “AI chews up and spits out art made by other people.”

StudentNation / Colin Warren

Displaced Palestinian youths take part in a training session at the Aida Refugee Camp's football pitch, next to the separation wall outside Bethlehem in the occupied West Bank, on December 16, 2025, a few weeks after an Israeli military decision to demolish the field.

What It Took to Save a Soccer Field in Palestine What It Took to Save a Soccer Field in Palestine

Europe’s governing soccer body saves a pitch in the West Bank—but is it only because the Swiss Parliament is threatening to pull its tax exemption over its inclusion of Israel?

Jules Boykoff and Dave Zirin

The Rev. Canon Kelly Brown Douglas during her sermon at the Cathedral of St. John the Divine in New York City on January 19, 2026.

Refusing Despair in a Despairing Time Refusing Despair in a Despairing Time

A Martin Luther King Jr. Day sermon by the Rev. Canon Dr. Kelly Brown Douglas.

Rev. Canon Kelly Brown Douglas