Editorial / June 6, 2025

How Dobbs Unleashed a Breathtaking Disregard for Human Rights

In this new era of Jane Crow, the right to choose is not only a question of bodily autonomy in life, but even in death.

How “Dobbs” Unleashed a Breathtaking Disregard for Human Rights

In this new era of Jane Crow, the right to choose is not only a question of bodily autonomy in life, but even in death.

Michele Goodwin for The Nation
An abortion rights activist wears tape on her mouth with the words “Second Class Citizen” while protesting in front of the Supreme Court building following the announcement to the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization ruling in Washington, DC.(Photo by Probal Rashid / LightRocket via Getty Images)

In a nightmare scenario straight out of dystopian science fiction, a brain-dead woman in Georgia has been forced to serve as a human incubator for over 100 days, in what amounts to the state-sponsored desecration of a deceased person. Yet this horrific situation isn’t fiction; it actually exists, in a state with one of the most draconian abortion bans in the nation. Indeed, it is because of Georgia’s abortion ban that hospital officials have taken control of Adriana Smith’s deceased body, acting without any regard for her grieving mother’s wishes.

Sadly, Adriana’s case reflects the new “Jane Crow” era, when the state in which a woman resides, becomes pregnant, and dies now determines whether she will be accorded basic civil and human rights. Since the Supreme Court’s Dobbs ruling overturned Roe v. Wade, which protected abortion rights in the United States, in June 2022, 19 states have passed laws that ban abortion altogether or place inordinate burdens on the ability to terminate a pregnancy—even in cases of rape or incest.

These new laws have unleashed a tidal wave of horrors: 10-year-old children forced to travel to the nearest state to terminate a pregnancy caused by sexual assault; women charged with abusing corpses or other offenses for having miscarriages; women forced to gestate dead fetuses or those missing a skull; women forced to bleed for days before receiving care, if they receive it at all. In Idaho, pregnant women have been airlifted out of the state to receive the medical care they are denied there.

Adriana’s case reflects the horrific double bind of race and sex in the United States. An African American nurse and mother, Adriana was declared brain-dead in February after seeking medical treatment. Tragically, a blood clot hadn’t been caught early in her pregnancy, during a medical visit in which Adriana complained of discomfort. Her mother, April Newkirk, believes that if her pain had been taken seriously, Adriana’s death could have been prevented. Standard tests that should have been performed to detect the clot and prevent her daughter’s death were not done, Newkirk said. Sadly, medical neglect is far too common among Black women, whose pain and medical complaints are often ignored or inadequately treated.

Yet, this is also a page ripped from the archives of an undeniable American history. Black women being reduced to the status of “property” and subjected to involuntary, forced labor and servitude that is sanctioned by unjust laws is nothing new.  The horrors in Georgia reflect its putrid past, whereby it sanctioned and fought for it to persist in its secession declaration. Particularly noteworthy was Georgia’s virulent fight to keep Black women fastened to forced servitude. 

In 1861, Georgia formally issued its secession from the United States, citing its commitment to slavery as its key reason. The Georgia legislature claimed the abolition of slavery as “endeavor[ing] to weaken our security, to disturb our domestic peace and tranquility.” Georgia lawmakers believed that keeping Black women in bondage was “their express constitutional [right]…in reference to that property.”  Their sense was that the “Federal Government have [sic] striven to deprive us of an equal enjoyment” of slavery. This is exactly what the Thirteenth Amendment abolished—literally slavery and involuntary servitude.

Now in Georgia’s new Jane Crow, at least two Black women have died of preventable causes after the state enacted its abortion ban. Black women were already three to four times more likely to die during pregnancy than white women. Now we are witnessing how the combined tolls of racism and sexism burden Black women even in death.

Brain death is the legal and medical standard used in the United States to determine death. It is the common standard used to determine when tissues can be harvested for organ transplants. Hospital officials, however, are using Adriana’s body to continue gestating her fetus because, they say, they have no other choice under Georgia’s abortion law. They claim her case exists in a legal gray area, requiring them to keep her on mechanical support until there is sufficient fetal development for a forced cesarean section. Their actions also raise issues regarding the health of the fetus, which reportedly has hydrocephalus, or fluid on the brain—a condition that is often fatal or severely debilitating.

Bent on ignoring human rights and civil liberties, antiabortion lawmakers also flagrantly disregard the costs to women, their children, and their families. Nor have they demonstrated any concern about preventing pregnant women’s deaths, let alone expanding the social welfare safety net to improve the quality of life, housing, childcare, food, and the environment for women with children. On the contrary, lawmakers in Georgia and other antiabortion states have sought to reduce such services, making it more and more difficult for women with children to live with dignity.

In this new era of Jane Crow, antiabortion states are now poised to deny that dignity even in death, in the blatant service of legislators’ reproductive interests. More tragedies will continue to unfold. This dystopia is not confined to bad dreams; it is a present reality—one that April Newkirk has described as torture, where choice is not only a question of bodily autonomy in life, but even in death.

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Michele Goodwin

Michele Goodwin is the Linda D. & Timothy J. O'Neill Professor of Constitutional Law and Global Health Policy at Georgetown University and Faculty Director of the O'Neill Institute. She is a recipient of the Polan Fellowship in Constitutional Law and History at the Brennan Center for Justice and author of the award-winning book Policing the Womb: Invisible Women and the Criminalization of Motherhood.

The Nation

Founded by abolitionists in 1865, The Nation has chronicled the breadth and depth of political and cultural life, from the debut of the telegraph to the rise of Twitter, serving as a critical, independent, and progressive voice in American journalism.

More from The Nation

The Supreme Court Loves Religious Freedom—Just Not for Rastafarians

The Supreme Court Loves Religious Freedom—Just Not for Rastafarians The Supreme Court Loves Religious Freedom—Just Not for Rastafarians

In a far-reaching ruling, the court violated a man’s constitutional rights—and undermined fundamental civil rights protections.

Elie Mystal

The Declaration’s catalog of grievances against King George III sound like Donald Trump’s to-do list.

The Celebration of the Nation's Birth Is Still a Sham The Celebration of the Nation's Birth Is Still a Sham

If America must observe its 250th anniversary, let it be by taking stock of Reconstruction’s unfinished mission.

Feature / Madiba K. Dennie

The boarding schools Native children were sent to, like this one in Ohio, were little more than brutal detainment camps.

250 Years of Genocide, Theft, and Displacement 250 Years of Genocide, Theft, and Displacement

Natives have nothing to celebrate as the United States stages another sick-making festival of self-congratulation.

Feature / Simon Moya-Smith

4 Years After “Dobbs,” How Do We Count the Dead?

4 Years After “Dobbs,” How Do We Count the Dead? 4 Years After “Dobbs,” How Do We Count the Dead?

In the post-Roe world, we know that abortion bans don’t stop safe abortions, but they do kill people.

Amy Littlefield

Gull Island

How Can We Reimagine Higher Education in the Age of Climate Change? How Can We Reimagine Higher Education in the Age of Climate Change?

An interview with the founders of Gull Island Institute.

Books & the Arts / Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins

Thurgood Marshall, the first Black Supreme Court justice, is as important in shaping of the Constiution as its framers.

America Is Due a Third Reconstruction America Is Due a Third Reconstruction

The nation can thank the Supreme Court for its periods of turmoil. It’s time for a new jurisprudence.

Feature / Michele Goodwin