Politics / January 16, 2025

Faiz Shakir’s Late Entry Shakes Up the Race for DNC Chair

The strategist who managed Bernie Sanders’s presidential race says the party needs vision and conviction “to restore a deeply damaged Democratic brand.”

John Nichols
Faiz Shakir appears on "Meet the Press" in 2023.

Faiz Shakir appearing on Meet the Press in 2023.

(William B. Plowman / NBC via Getty Images)

Before this week, the hotly contested race for chair of the Democratic National Committee looked as if it had settled into a reasonably well-defined matchup between a pair of experienced front-runners—Wisconsin Democratic Party chair Ben Wikler and Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party chair Ken Martin—and a half-dozen minor contenders, including former Maryland governor and 2016 presidential candidate Martin O’Malley and 2020 and 2024 presidential candidate Marianne Williamson.

But, with just two weeks to go before the February 1 vote, the contest took a major turn Wednesday, with the late-stage entry of one of the biggest names in progressive political organizing, Faiz Shakir, a senior adviser to Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders who managed Sanders’s 2020 presidential bid after serving as political director of the American Civil Liberties Union, editor in chief of the influential ThinkProgress website, and a key aide to both Nancy Pelosi, the former Democratic speaker of the House, and Harry Reid, the former Democratic Senate majority leader.

Shakir said he entered the competition—which will install a key leader for the party as it reels from the loss of the White House and Congress in the 2024 election—because he was frustrated with the “lack of vision and conviction for what to do to restore a deeply damaged Democratic brand.” In a letter to DNC members, he wrote, “As I have listened to our candidates, I sense a constrained, status-quo style of thinking. We cannot expect working-class audiences to see us any differently if we are not offering anything new or substantive to attract their support.”

In an interview with the Associated Press, Shakir went further, saying of the race, “It feels very fluid to me, based out of a lack of energy and a sense of aimless drift that people are feeling. Democrats are in the wilderness, right? There’s no real leader.”

The other candidates, most of whom have talked about renewing the party’s appeal to traditional Democratic voters who moved toward Donald Trump and the GOP in the 2024 election, will surely disagree with Shakir’s assessment of their bids. Wikler, in particular, has placed a heavy emphasis on appealing to union members and the broader working class, arguing,”On every platform, voters need to hear that Democrats are on the side of working people and Republicans are on the side of the billionaires trying to rig our economy for themselves.”

But Shakir has a history of urging Democrats to make their party more aggressively progressive and populist. The founder of the More Perfect Media project, which has earned high marks for its messaging to disenchanted working-class voters of all races and backgrounds, he has strong ties to many of the nation’s leading labor leaders and progressive activists. Now, as a candidate for party chair, he is making a blunt argument that the DNC must develop “its own powerful media outlet, doing compelling original content in different video, text and graphic formats” and create “an organizing army which lends support to striking and organizing union and non-union workers” in order to renew itself. Shakir also brings to the competition a stark critique of the much-maligned Democratic strategy of having 2024 party nominee Kamala Harris campaign alongside former Republican US representative Liz Cheney and billionaire Mark Cuban.

Current Issue

Cover of March 2026 Issue

Shakir acknowledged to The New York Times Wednesday that his entry comes “late in the game.” Many observers believe that Martin, the current president of the Association of State Democratic Committees and a sitting vice chair of the DNC, has opened a lead with the 448 DNC members. He has also attracted support from influential United Food and Commercial Workers union leaders who sit on the DNC. In a sign of his perceived strength, one of the most engaging candidates for chair, New York state Senator James Skoufis, announced on Thursday that he was quitting the race to back Martin.

At the same time, Wikler has been attracting high-profile endorsements from liberal Democratic senators such as Chris Murphy of Connecticut and Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin, and Democratic “stars” such as Michigan state Senator Mallory McMorrow, former Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams, and North Carolina Democratic Party chair Anderson Clayton—along with powerful party figures such as Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer. The Wisconsinite has also been endorsed by activist groups such as MoveOn and the Progressive Change Campaign Committee.

But even if he may be coming from behind, Shakir’s candidacy should ensure that the chair’s race will be more sharply focused on ending the DNC’s deference to economic elites—a bedrock concern for Shakir, who has worked as a senior adviser for the anti-monopoly agitators at the American Economic Liberty Project. The prospect of that bolder debate about the direction Democrats will take excites some of the most dynamic figures in the party. Sanders has not made an endorsement in the race yet. But Sara Nelson, the president of the Association of Flight Attendants union and a popular figure among progressive Democrats and labor activists, announced, “I am proud to endorse Faiz Shakir as Chair of the Democratic National Committee. Faiz not only has the right working class credibility, vision, and insight for this moment, but he also has the vast experience needed to operate and rebuild the DNC.”

“The party is at a critical moment, and we need to embrace changing status quo. Faiz’s vision and conviction is clear: use the authority and resources of the DNC to build power for working people—the promise of America,” added Nelson, who argued that Shakir “is the leader the party needs at this moment.”

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

John Nichols

John Nichols is the executive editor of The Nation. He previously served as the magazine’s national affairs correspondent and Washington correspondent. Nichols has written, cowritten, or edited over a dozen books on topics ranging from histories of American socialism and the Democratic Party to analyses of US and global media systems. His latest, cowritten with Senator Bernie Sanders, is the New York Times bestseller It's OK to Be Angry About Capitalism.

More from The Nation

Donald Trump at Dover Air Force Base in Dover, Delaware, on March 7, 2026.

Trump’s War Is Destroying the Global Economy Trump’s War Is Destroying the Global Economy

Spiraling financial chaos might be the only thing that can force the president to pull back from this conflict.

Jeet Heer

Make America Great Again

Make America Great Again Make America Great Again

Who are the immigrants?

OppArt / Anonymous and Peter Kuper

Reproductive justice advocates rallied on the day that Representative Barbara Lee introduced the Equal Access to Abortion Coverage in Health Insurance (EACH) Act on July 8, 2015.

How the Abortion Rights Activists Found Their Radical Imagination How the Abortion Rights Activists Found Their Radical Imagination

A long-shot campaign to restore public funding for abortion turned into the movement’s biggest success in a generation.

Amy Littlefield

An Argument Against Voting for the “Electable” Guy

An Argument Against Voting for the “Electable” Guy An Argument Against Voting for the “Electable” Guy

In this week’s Elie v. US, The Nation’s justice correspondent shares his thoughts on the Texas primaries. Plus, a terrible Supreme Court decision and a bad play by Major League Ba...

Elie Mystal

War Week 1

War Week 1 War Week 1

Died for low ratings.

Steve Brodner

Screenshot from a White House video showing pastors praying over Donald Trump in the Oval Office on March 5, 2026.

A Conflict Without Reason Has Become a Dangerous Holy War A Conflict Without Reason Has Become a Dangerous Holy War

Lacking a clear rationale for the attack on Iran, Trumpists are increasingly talking like crusaders.

Jeet Heer