Wolfgang Koeppen—“Poet of Failure”
The German writer’s postwar works were ruthless in their condemnation of a country that, in its inability to reckon with historical atrocity, was beyond reform.
Among the fresh perplexities of our age is the recrudescence of what Thomas Mann defined as the “German problem”: a pact between “the German spirit” and “the demonic.” It is manifested variously: in the genocidal philosemitism of many in Germany’s political and intellectual classes, including the philosopher Jürgen Habermas; the brutal crushing of protesters against the limitless German license to Israeli fanatics; and the electoral resurgence of a neo-Nazi far right boosted by American white supremacists while Germany embarks on its most ambitious rearmament program since 1945.
Suddenly, the myth that postwar German society pioneered an admirable memory culture, allowing it to absorb the right lessons from its criminal past, has been discarded by the mythmakers themselves—Susan Neiman, who wrote admiringly of Vergangenheitsbewältigung (“dealing with the past”), now claims that “German historical reckoning has gone haywire.” Germany once again appears an extreme case of political derangement, as Wolfgang Streeck noted in early 2026, shocked by the country’s “stony equanimity in the face of uninhibited cruelty, its studied absence of moral emotion, the icy silence of its political as well as its intellectual class, from journalists to professors, from movie directors and artists to writers.”
Of the many German writers born in the first three decades of the 20th century (Günter Grass, Christa Wolf, Siegfried Lenz, Martin Walser, Heinrich Böll, Uwe Johnson), Wolfgang Koeppen would have been the least surprised by the tenacity of the German problem. “Hitler will remain with us” is the title of an essay he published in 1966, a year before the German press started to project a taboo nationalism on the state of Israel (Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung greeted Israel’s victory in the Six-Day War in 1967 with an editorial titled “Der Blitzkrieg Israels”). The CEO of the Axel Springer media conglomerate Mathias Döpfner today proudly proclaims “Zionismus über alles” (Zionism above all) as his motto, brazenly alluding to the deleted first line of the German national anthem, “Deutschland Über Alles.” Many others warned against the insidious persistence of the ancien régime in Europe. Speaking in 1946 of the “perversions” of “white, Western civilization,” Albert Camus claimed “that we are all united with Hitlerism,” and that its “poison” was carried in “our very hearts.” But the work of no postwar European writer is informed so completely and insistently by this furious conviction.
The suspicion that Hitlerism has survived Germany’s zero hour in 1945 is what sours the political idealism of the protagonist of The Hothouse, who has returned from exile to Bonn, the provisional capital of West Germany: “He wanted to realize his youthful dreams, at the time he had been a believer in change, but he soon saw what a foolish belief that was, people had naturally remained the same, it didn’t even occur to them to change, merely because the form of government had changed, because the uniforms thronging the streets and making babies were now olive-green instead of brown, black, and field gray.”
The Hothouse was the second in Koeppen’s trilogy of novels which, met contemptuously on publication, are now considered masterpieces of German literature: Pigeons on the Grass (1951), The Hothouse (1953), and Death in Rome (1954). Born in 1906, in Greifswald, Pomerania, and shaped by the intellectual excitements of Berlin during the Weimar Republic, Koeppen went into exile in the Netherlands after Hitler came to power in January of 1933. Forced to return in 1938 by penury, he turned into a scriptwriter for films; he was saved from the worst of the war by a series of lucky breaks.
His biography records that the same financial exigencies that forced his repatriation to Nazi Germany made him a hectic producer of literary texts after 1945. But a mind and sensibility as acute as his, and further sharpened by adversity, must have found irresistible the novelistic material of postwar Germany. Reflecting on “the first half of the twentieth century with its political catastrophes, its moral disasters,” in Men in Dark Times, Hannah Arendt speaks of “a world in which everybody who is publicly recognized belongs among the salauds, and everything that is exists in an opaque, meaningless thereness which spreads obfuscation and causes disgust.” Koeppen worked boldly with the assumption that most men growing prominent in the public sphere were scoundrels. It is easy to see why.
The revelation of Nazi crimes had provoked fresh legal and intellectual interrogations of what Karl Jaspers called “German guilt.” Yet even as Jaspers lectured on the need for self-reflection and Western journalists flocked to the Nuremberg trials, West Germany was given honorary membership of a new Western community called the “free world.” Denazification, grandiosely decreed by the country’s American occupiers, was immediately defanged by cold warriors rushing to find reliable anti-Communists among German Nazis. “Notes were exchanged,” Koeppen writes in The Hothouse, “Treaties signed. The game was on once more. The same old game? The same. The Federal Republic was a player again.” In a mind-spinning ideological reconfiguration, a Germany where stalwarts of the Third Reich occupied senior positions in the civil service, judiciary, and academia, was now mobilized against the Soviet Union, the West’s indispensable ally against Nazism. Oppressed by virulent anti-communism in the United States, but unwilling to settle back in Germany, Thomas Mann noted in 1949 how “everything that after 1945 had for a moment to bend down and hide itself is now shamelessly raising its head, encouraged by the madness and short-sightedness from abroad.”
Confrontation with Germany’s criminal past began to be deferred also because most Germans were consumed by their postwar misery, the extensive destruction of their cities, the influx of many millions of refugees ethnically cleansed from Eastern Europe, and the lack of food. Few war criminals had been punished when the Marshall Plan was announced and Konrad Adenauer, elected as the first West German chancellor, started an ambitious project of economic reconstruction. As the Korean War erupted, Adenauer shrewdly manipulated American need for reliable partners against Soviet communism. He also recognized that the road to the West went through Jerusalem, and moved fast to secure Israel’s friendship with cash reparations, military hardware, and technical know-how. (He explained after his retirement that “the power of the Jews even today, especially in America, should not be underestimated.”)
None of this amoral realpolitik was conducive to what Thomas Mann hoped postwar Germans would do: abjure the slavish deference to power and authority that had made possible Nazi atrocities, and attend to “the development of the free spirit.” As an “economic miracle” began to manifest itself instead, there were few further questions about what had consolidated Hitler’s power and brought on the war, or how deep was the complicity of ordinary German citizens in Nazism. Early postwar literature, defined as “literature of the rubble” spoke less of Nazi barbarities and more about the wartime and postwar travails of the German population. Introducing a selection of texts from Group 47, an informal literary community that originated in the prisoner of war camps, the critic Fritz Raddatz noted, “In the entire volume, the words Hitler, concentration camp, nuclear bomb, SS, Nazi, Siberia do not appear.”
Shrewdly, if also riskily, Koeppen made this national denial and self-deception his resonant subject. Pigeons on the Grass first shows his expressionist style, influenced by Faulkner and Dos Passos as well as Döblin’s Berlin Alexanderplatz, and his characteristic technique of juxtaposing scenes and multiple characters with interior monologues. Set in Munich in 1948, it describes a city where, as in Malaparte’s Naples, American occupiers are trying to usher the desperate and ruthlessly self-seeking natives on to the path to democracy and human rights. In Death in Rome, Koeppen describes a cast of German characters wholly untouched by feelings of guilt, and determined to regain their former status in Germany. Among them is a former SS officer hiding under a false identity who “did not regret having killed, but rather not having killed enough”; he is eventually reinstated in Germany by his brother-in-law, the respectable mayor of a small German town.
In The Hothouse, Koeppen chose a more intractable novelistic subject: parliamentary politics, which in Germany then was making an attempt to regenerate itself. Keetenheuve is a literary-minded member of the Bundestag, a reader of Baudelaire, E. E. Cummings, and Walt Whitman, and a former exile whose rebellious private misgivings make him an outsider within his own left-leaning political group:
Keetenheuve wanted to be reelected because he thought of himself as one of the few who used their mandate against established power. But what could he say? Should he paint a ray of sunshine on the horizon, produce the old silver lining that gets pulled out of the bag every time like tinsel at Christmas (which was how the party wanted it), the hope that things would get better, that fata morgana for simple minds that goes up in smoke after every election, as if the votes had been cast in Hephaistos’s furnace?”
Popular
“swipe left below to view more authors”Swipe →Embarrassed by the trite promises of reformism, Keetenheuve cannot bring himself to embrace violent revolution either: “The lesson he persisted in drawing from history was that the abjuring of force and self-defense had never brought such evil in its train as their use.” The recent convulsions of nationalism have made him permanently hostile to any revised notion of Heimat: He despises “the cage he’d been born into, the cage called Fatherland, which dangled along with a bunch of other cages called Fatherland, all on a rod, which a great collector of cages and peoples was carrying deeper into history.” Moreover (and here he confirms that the Great Replacement theory never disappeared from Europe): “In all the cages, they were worried about declining population numbers, but the only additions that were welcome came from the wombs of the female denizens of the cage, and that was a terrible image of the lack of freedom all over the world.”
The same loathing of ethnonational zealots in their self-made prisons makes him oppose the reestablishment of a military force—what was being debated in West Germany while Koeppen was working on his trilogy. But his belief that German rearmament poses a grave moral peril is not shared by even his own colleagues who chase the fantasy that the new patriots in uniform will be socialist and democratic:
It only made him sadder, and he was sad already; but it isn’t shocking to hear a confirmation of what one has already known and been afraid of for a long time, in this case the national restoration, the restorative nationalism, that everything was pointing toward. The borders weren’t falling. They were going up again.
In Europe’s prestigious intellectual ancestry, he sees a vast and grisly spectacle of philosophically justified bloodletting: “so many philanthropists had helped dig channels for the blood, so many well-intentioned people, the Encyclopedists, the Romantics, the Hegelians, the Marxists, and the Nationalists of various stripe.” But he senses delusion, too, in the Americanized future then being proposed for postwar Europe: “The time for the tender faith in liberty, equality, fraternity, it was over the morning of America the poems of Whitman strength and genius it was all onanism.” Aided by modern science, the United States had demonstrated a more efficient form of mass murder in Hiroshima: one of the fresh “atrocities that were breaking out all over the world like bleeding and purulent sores.”
Despite his strong intuitions and opinions, Keetenheuve is a curiously vulnerable and self-reflective character:
Older now, he had the feeling of having barely begun, and yet of already nearing the end of his life’s road. So much had happened that he had the impression he had just been standing still and hadn’t made any progress; the catastrophes he had witnessed, the momentous events, historical decline, the dawning of new epochs whose parting gleam or bloody rise (who could tell?) had tinted and tanned his own features too, all that left him feeling, at forty-five, like a boy who had just come out of a thriller and was now rubbing his eyes, foolishly exhilarated, foolishly disappointed, and foolishly dissipated.
Koeppen’s rhythmically precise prose, deftly translated by Michael Hofmann, is only one of the many satisfactions of The Hothouse. Only very rarely in fiction do we encounter such a subtle portrait of the ambivalent literary intellectual as politician. The most fitting comparisons are to Doris Lessing’s The Temptation of Jack Orkney and V.S. Naipaul’s The Mimic Men.
In his own estimation he was a lamb. But he wasn’t going to make way for the wolves. Not this time. The trouble was that he was lazy; lazy even when he worked for sixteen hours a day, and not badly at that. He was lazy because he was uncertain, questioning, despairing, skeptical, and his own eager and honest advocacy of human rights was nothing but the last foppish remnant of the spirit of opposition and resistance to the state. His back had been broken, and the wolves would have little trouble taking everything away from him again. What else could Keetenheuve turn his hand to? He could cook. He could keep a room clean. He had housewifely virtues. Should he tend his conscience, write articles, address commentaries to the ether, become a public Cassandra? Who would print the articles, broadcast the commentaries, or give ear to Cassandra? Should he go on the barricades? If he thought about it, he would prefer to cook.
In the end, he prefers not to cook. Committing the ultimate act of despair, he appears an extreme alter ego of the author, himself then alternating between rage, despondency, and exhaustion over his unreformed and unreformable compatriots, but compelled to write. “We all live with politics, we are its objects, perhaps already its victims,” Koeppen said in a 1961 interview. “How, in such a situation,” he asked, “can the writer act like the ostrich, and who but the writer should play the role of Cassandra in our society?”
Certainly, his Cassandra-ish trilogy anticipated much social, political, and psychological criticism of German society in the years to come; from Nazis discovered to be regnant in public life to the memory loss induced by the economic miracle and the parental denial and cover-up that a younger generation recoiled from. It is unmistakably a precursor of such novels as Heinrich Böll’s Billiard at Half Past Nine and Günter Grass’s The Tin Drum. However, Koeppen’s premature success in diagnosing national psychosis could not go unpunished; the trilogy was a critical and commercial flop on its first publication. Koeppen wrote no more novels, and was saved from indigence by an influential sponsor: the critic Marcel Reich-Ranicki, who was struck by his narrative power and moral courage from the moment he read him in the 1950s. Ranicki later hailed Koeppen as the “poet of our failures,” and together with Max Frisch, Heinrich Böll, Günter Grass, and Siegfried Lenz organized a common fund to support his writing.
Reich-Ranicki, a survivor of the Warsaw ghetto, could see why “the West German public had at first little and later no understanding at all of Koeppen’s epic formulations of unsavory truths.” Today, however, that understanding seems less difficult as political evil in the form of monstrous demagogues and acquiescent masses suddenly has, for the first time since the 1940s, an unmediated presence across Europe and the United States. Certainly, there aren’t many signs of “communicative rationality” in the “public sphere” (two notions patented by Jürgen Habermas during his long moral rehabilitation of Germany in the Western community).
Koeppen’s insights become more incandescently valuable as the free world’s most conspicuous novelists, rendered languid by decades of affluence and stability, seem completely unprepared for a new dark time. His disgust at the salauds seems bracing; his harshest early judgments—of, for instance, Europe’s onanistic infatuation with America—no longer seem to lack balance; and his vision of a broad retardation of social intelligence can be verified in real time. Refusing to identify progress with any class, nation, or redemptive ideology, this poet of failure held fast to his unsavory truths about a world the many varieties of Hitlerism had made; and we are finally catching up with his visionary bleakness.
Your support makes stories like this possible
From illegal war on Iran to an inhumane fuel blockade of Cuba, from AI weapons to crypto corruption, this is a time of staggering chaos, cruelty, and violence.
Unlike other publications that parrot the views of authoritarians, billionaires, and corporations, The Nation publishes stories that hold the powerful to account and center the communities too often denied a voice in the national media—stories like the one you’ve just read.
Each day, our journalism cuts through lies and distortions, contextualizes the developments reshaping politics around the globe, and advances progressive ideas that oxygenate our movements and instigate change in the halls of power.
This independent journalism is only possible with the support of our readers. If you want to see more urgent coverage like this, please donate to The Nation today.
More from The Nation
Lea Ypi’s Family Secrets Lea Ypi’s Family Secrets
In the political theorist’s genre-bending book on Albania and historical memory, Indignity, she interrogates how much one family can be implicated in a country’s becoming.
The Conflicted Origins of Sociology The Conflicted Origins of Sociology
Kwame Appiah Anthony’s Captive Gods examines how the founders of the discipline responded to a widespread decline in Christianity in the late 19th century.
Larry McMurtry’s Tall Tales Larry McMurtry’s Tall Tales
By questioning the myth of the cowboy, he offered a different kind of legend, one more suited to this country and its contradictions.
The Strange Afterlife of Confederate Monuments The Strange Afterlife of Confederate Monuments
“Monuments” an exhibition in Los Angeles, interrogates the changing meanings of Civil War-era statues and their ability to shape historical narrative.
The Enduring Lessons of the Jewish Bund The Enduring Lessons of the Jewish Bund
A conversation with Molly Crabapple about “Here Where We Live Is Our Country,” her history of Bundism, and what we can learn from their socialist and anti-Zionist example.
Waging a Culture War by Promoting Comedic Mediocrity Waging a Culture War by Promoting Comedic Mediocrity
The Ellison family, poised to continue dominating the media landscape with its Warner deal, signs on an infomercial-grade comic to replace Stephen Colbert.
