The Nation’s Early Experiments in Jazz
The Nation’s Early Experiments in Jazz
When the magazine began covering jazz in the 1920s, it often struggled to catch the beat.

Ethan Iverson writes in this issue about a newly surfaced recording of pianist McCoy Tyner and saxophonist Joe Henderson playing at the downtown club Slugs’ in 1966. Reading his piece, I wondered how The Nation covered the advent of jazz a century ago.
Edited by the gentlemanly class traitor Oswald Garrison Villard, the magazine was turning ever more politically radical, yet it remained culturally somewhat conservative. Its early coverage of jazz reflected both tendencies, signaling an openness to the emerging form even as it offered a rather patronizing take on the music’s significance.
“There are times,” the critic Henrietta Straus reluctantly granted in early 1922, “when jazz may be regarded as a virtue.”
Straus was talking about a new concert by the classically trained white interpreter John Alden Carpenter, whom she praised for having turned the “noisy commentaries” of jazz into “philosophic reflections.” Within two years, she had adopted a more generous appraisal of the form—she described the white bandleader Paul Whiteman’s now-famous “An Experiment in Modern Music” concert, in which he premiered George Gershwin’s Rhapsody in Blue, as nothing less than “revolutionary.” Even so, for her, as for other Nation contributors, jazz—or, at least, the jazz they deemed worth discussion—was a white phenomenon, stripped of its African American roots. It would take another decade for the magazine to give equal attention to Black musicians.
Some Nation writers went out of their way to avoid discussing race in their critiques of the new music, even as loaded language seeped through nonetheless. “Industrialized folk-music” is how William J. Shultz described jazz in the October 25, 1922, issue of The Nation. “It is at once the old and the new.”
Traditional European folk music, Schultz explained, had reflected the bucolic concerns of “the great, silent, subject, agricultural population. Their music was a music of out-of-doors…a music of physical merrymaking, a music that looked away from weary body-labor, yet ever reflected its shadow through the wildest abandon.” Jazz, in contrast, was an expression of the modern age. It addressed the desires and concerns of the Massemensch (mass-man), “a creature of paved and lighted streets and grimed air.”
Shultz saw jazz as the culmination of a long cultural decline that began with the French Revolution and the dwindling of landed aristocracies that had long supplied funds for the creation of “intellectualized music.” The dilettantish nouveaux riches who took over as supporters of the arts “sought only for the less exacting sensuous appeal in music.” The result: “From Schubert through Schumann, Wagner, the Russian school, Richard Strauss, to Stravinski and Schoenberg, romantic music has been letting down the high standards of the classic era…trying to cover its retreat by criticizing the older music as dry and formal.” Modern composers had become mere “experimentor[s] in cacophony.”
Still, at least jazz wasn’t pretentious. “It does not play the hypocrite or deceive itself by talking glibly in the cant of art,” Shultz wrote. “Our contempt for jazz is snobbery…. The cognoscenti, like the poor, are always with us; theirs be the kingdoms of romantic and classic music. The jazzists will never dispute them their possessions.”
Be part of 160 years of confronting power
Every day, The Nation exposes the administration’s unchecked and reckless abuses of power through clear-eyed, uncompromising independent journalism—the kind of journalism that holds the powerful to account and helps build alternatives to the world we live in now.
We have just the right people to confront this moment. Speaking on Democracy Now!, Nation DC Bureau chief Chris Lehmann translated the complex terms of the budget bill into the plain truth, describing it as “the single largest upward redistribution of wealth effectuated by any piece of legislation in our history.” In the pages of the June print issue and on The Nation Podcast, Jacob Silverman dove deep into how crypto has captured American campaign finance, revealing that it was the top donor in the 2024 elections as an industry and won nearly every race it supported.
This is all in addition to The Nation’s exceptional coverage of matters of war and peace, the courts, reproductive justice, climate, immigration, healthcare, and much more.
Our 160-year history of sounding the alarm on presidential overreach and the persecution of dissent has prepared us for this moment. 2025 marks a new chapter in this history, and we need you to be part of it.
We’re aiming to raise $20,000 during our June Fundraising Campaign to fund our change-making reporting and analysis. Stand for bold, independent journalism and donate to support The Nation today.
Onward,
Katrina vanden Heuvel
Publisher, The Nation