The Winning Progressive Strategy? Direct Action and Civil Disobedience

The Winning Progressive Strategy? Direct Action and Civil Disobedience

The Winning Progressive Strategy? Direct Action and Civil Disobedience

We have to stop compromising on our core demands and build power by taking it to the streets.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Becky Bond is the political director at CREDO Mobile and president of CREDO SuperPAC.

Progressives are waiting to be asked to do something big.

Just look at the quiet emergence of mass civil disobedience, ranging from nearly 100,000 people signing the Pledge of Resistance to stop the Keystone XL pipeline to the serial arrests of activists in North Carolina’s Moral Monday movement to the courageous Dreamers who at great personal risk continue to block deportation buses departing from ICE detention centers.

On the major issues of our day—climate change, corporate money in politics, Wall Street accountability, gun laws, immigration reform —the majority of Americans agree with progressives.

Why, then, are we losing battles where we are in the majority—sometimes in the vast majority? These are fights where we have the power to win. But we often lose even when we offer to compromise on our core demands. Again and again, the right wing refuses to negotiate in good faith, repeatedly beating us at the inside game when it comes to winner-take-all showdowns, in Washington as well as state capitols from coast to coast.

That’s why we’re seeing people risking arrest to build power. They are taking direct action on their own—people like Tim DeChristopher, who took on the fossil fuel industry by bidding for federal mining leases in Utah and went to jail for it. And they are organizing through local institutions, such as Moral Monday in North Carolina, where the Rev. William Barber and the local NAACP chapter are protesting the radical Republican takeover of the state legislature.

It’s long past time to embrace a progressive flank strategy. Our movement needs clear goals. Ban fracking! Universal healthcare now! Overturn Citizens United! Stop breaking up families! But we eviscerate the power of the grassroots with complicated, nuanced and, often, fatally compromised demands.

From climate change to economic justice to civil rights, we need to stop backing down and do big things instead, including escalating fights to the point that we are filling up jails, if necessary. Where we are in the majority, our emphasis should not be on focus-group-tested messages in hopes of persuading the center right at the cost of demoralizing our progressive base. Nor should we pursue another watered-down compromise that our conservative opponents—fixated on total victory—will reject anyway.

There’s an old activist joke. No massive crowd ever wants to chant these words: “What do we want?” “INCREMENTAL CHANGE!” “When do we want it?” “WHENEVER IT’S GOOD FOR YOU!”

Most Americans are pretty smart, and progressives know more than many movement strategists give them credit for. They understand that the inside game in politics is rigged in favor of conservatives. Recent Supreme Court decisions have opened the floodgates to corporate contributions in our democracy, and the Court is likely to remove all individual limits in the future, giving money even greater influence in our elections. After 200 years of expanding the franchise to virtually all citizens over 18, states are now systematically taking away people’s right to vote. And that’s in addition to the structural barriers in institutions like the US Senate, where a conservative state like Wyoming has only 1.5 percent of the population of a more progressive state like California but enjoys equal representation.

Progressives need to focus on the outside game, ask our activists to step up and take the lead, and give people the opportunity to do something big to fight for what we believe in (and the majority of Americans support). Conservative political organizations have more money and are overrepresented in our federal government. But progressives have people, people willing to go as far as risking arrest to force conservatives to the table and win the change we want to see.

From the women’s movement to the civil rights movement to the labor rights movement to the anti–Vietnam War movement, major popular movements in America have depended in no small part on civil disobedience to win real change.

We find ourselves once again in a political moment when those in power refuse to recognize the will of the people. It’s up to progressives to articulate clear and sweeping demands that meet the challenges of our day. We must confront those in power and let them know we won’t be ignored. When regular people stand together and take collective direct action, we can and will win.

PROGRESSIVE STRATEGIES IN A POPULIST MOMENT

Also in this forum…

Robert L. Borosage: “Time to Stand Up and Fight for a More Perfect Union

Rev. Dr. William J. Barber II: “How to Build a Powerful People's Movement

Carlos Saavedra: “Winning the Fight for Public Opinion

Sarita Gupta: “How to Write a New Organizing Playbook

David Rolf: “What if We Treated Labor Like a Startup?

Daniel Cantor : “How the Working Families Party Is Already Changing Electoral Politics

May Boeve: “Fighting, Not Drowning

Leah Hunt-Hendrix and Max Berger: “How to Organize After Occupy Wall Street

George Goehl: “Organizing Where We Have the Most Leverage: in the Cities

 

 

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x