Puzzle No. 1591

Puzzle No. 1591

This puzzle originally appeared in the June 28, 1975, issue.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email
ACROSS
 1 and 20 across If this were so, one of them might be chow time. (5,3,3,3,3)
 9 Not a wrestling throw—it’s a more genteel game. (4,4)
10 If you have to, something may have been mislaid in the shuffle. (6)
11 Detains the alternative possibility? (7)
12 There’s a point to what might be associated with an artist. (7)
14 An opening in a small part of the school associated with marine life? (6)
15 A petty annoyance, if Beatle-arranged. (8)
17 Tend to be wary? (4,4)
20 See 1
22 See 13 down
24 Run by a poor navigator? (7)
26 The Mikado’s cloth might prove false. (6)
27 Someone might read 3 to try and calm one. (8)
28 Not what Mae West intended for her invitees, though the brash are more likely to get theirs. (11)
 
DOWN
 2 and 25 down A bad poet gave blues a first presentation, as a matter of course. (9,4)
 3 Implying Brazilians are noted for their diplomacy, although it could be a disturbing incident. (4,3)
 4 and 8 In the publishing business, do they offer this for protection? (You might, before going out, if you’re worried about a suit.) (4,6)
 5 Closely related to Gothic character? (7)
 6 Put two and two together. (5)
 7 The flower of Cadiz, in Niagara now. (6)
 8 See 4 down
13 and 22 across One of the things the detective is, only? (One might not like to be such an accessory.) (5,3,4)
16 See? (9)
18 The city, as it should be about that time. (6)
19 Grow together with the current island combination. (7)
20 Tipsy with drink? That’s what some Britishers get in the afternoon! (4,3)
21 The plant’s yearly report, obviously. (6)
23 Some distance to travel in the north central region. (5)
25 See 2 down
For another opinion on Clue 9, Puzzle No. 1588, see the Letters page.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x