Passings

Passings

In its tribute to Daniel Patrick Moynihan, who died on March 26, The Economist mentions that his office washroom displayed a framed cover of the September 22, 1979, issue of The Natio

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

In its tribute to Daniel Patrick Moynihan, who died on March 26, The Economist mentions that his office washroom displayed a framed cover of the September 22, 1979, issue of The Nation, “Moynihan: The Conscience of a Neoconservative.” Pat Moynihan thus had the rare distinction among politicians of inspiring an entire issue of The Nation, comprising critical analyses of his politics and policies (though there was praise as well). In the intervening years we could probably have assembled enough material for another Moynihan issue, but after being elected senator from New York in 1976, Moynihan became a less reliable neoconservative and a more conventional Democratic politician. Dapper and donnish, bibulous and charming, Moynihan was obviously ambitious, else he would have remained a comfortably tenured Harvard professor rather than building an eclectic government résumé that included assistant labor secretary in the Kennedy Administration, ambassadorships to India and the United Nations, as well as senator. In the 1960s he adopted the neoconservative views of Irving Kristol and other apostate liberals, his credentials burnished by his 1965 report, The Negro Family: The Case for National Action. As the black academic St. Clair Drake wrote in these pages in 1975, “Moynihan’s scholarship has been subordinated to advocacy, and he employs data to justify programs of action, not to test hypotheses,” which may explain the inflamed reception The Negro Family received. It was particularly resented by African-Americans, and it was the subject of a scholarly dissection by Herbert Gutman in our Moynihan issue.

Moynihan moved on to become the Nixon Administration’s house liberal, advising “benign neglect” of race issues (meaning, he said, cool the rhetoric, but giving comfort to neo-segs) telling off the Third World in the UN, where he won fame for denouncing the infamous “Zionism is racism” resolution. His undiplomatic pugnacity put him in bad with his boss, Henry Kissinger, but won him a ticket to the Senate, where he would oppose welfare reform Clinton-style, various Reagan imperial adventures, Gulf War I and encroaching government secrecy.

* * *

Herbert Aptheker, who died on March 17, at 87, was one of the first white historians to render truly the African-American experience. He was author of American Negro Slave Revolts, among many other books, and edited the monumental A Documentary History of the Negro People in the United States and the writings and correspondence of his mentor W.E.B. Du Bois. He and his wife, Fay, were active members of the Communist Party until 1991, and this affiliation barred him from teaching positions until late in life. Columbia history professor Eric Foner says, “He was one of the key pioneers of modern African-American history. At a time when most scholars still held to the view that slavery was a benign institution with little slave resistance, that abolitionists were irresponsible fanatics, and that the Civil War was a family quarrel between white Americans, Aptheker challenged them to make blacks active agents in the telling of American history.”

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x