Neo-Cold Warriors

Neo-Cold Warriors

The Weekly Standard's assault on my article is a quintessential example of cold-war thinking and debased discourse.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email


Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Though recklessly indifferent to America's vital interests, the September 30 issue of The Weekly Standard made my day. Its scurrilous response to my article "Demonizing Putin Endangers America's Security," posted on thenation.com on September 16, amply illustrates my longstanding argument that the US-Russian cold war is on again—or never ended—especially in the American political-media establishment.

The Weekly Standard's assault on my article—reflexively including The Nation and my patriotism—is a quintessential example of cold-war thinking and debased discourse. On one level, it ignores entirely the matter of America's national security—my point that the wide-spread media denigration of Vladimir Putin may lead Washington to reject, or otherwise subvert, the Russian leader's proposal to avoid war by putting Syria's chemical weapons under international control. Only very bad consequences can result from yet another American war in the Middle East, but in this the missile-ready Weekly Standard, which remains silent about its role in the disastrous US war in Iraq, has no interest whatsoever. Its sole purpose instead is to allege that "defending the peace-loving Russians" is something "in which The Nation has specialized since October 1917." (Today's American cold warriors usually focus on events after 1945, but The Weekly Standard's obsessions are nearly centennial.)

For my thesis, things then get even better, as predictable cold-war era personal slurs follow. It turns out that I have managed "to evolve from a Soviet apologist into a Russian nationalist." And this because I, and The Nation, have always had "contempt for the United States" and "hostility to the land of [our] birth." No need to point out that this kind of political defamation is straight from the McCarthy era, but I will exercise a personal privilege: Having grown up in Kentucky, attended college in Indiana, lived for some time in Florida, taught for thirty years in New Jersey and lived even longer in New York, states for which I retain considerable affection, I hereby testify that The Weekly Standard's cold-war repetitions are both preposterous and, in regard to our national interests, un-American.

Stephen F. Cohen writes about why demonizing Russia threatens US national security.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x