Mexico’s Fractured Electoral Landscape

Mexico’s Fractured Electoral Landscape

Mexico’s Fractured Electoral Landscape

The disputed presidential election has fractured Mexico’s political landscape, pitting leftists against conservatives and the affluent against an indignant Indian and mestizo underclass.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Mexico City

One week after the most viciously contested presidential election in the history of modern Mexico, a Florida-sized fraud looms over the Mexican landscape, and the nation has been divided almost exactly in half along political, economic, geographical and racial lines. Right-winger Felipe Calderón’s questionable 243,000-vote victory over left-wing populist Andrés Manuel López Obrador (known by his initials, AMLO) splits the country between the industrial north and the impoverished, indigenous south. The cliffhanger election also pits an indignant Indian and mestizo underclass that believes López Obrador was swindled out of the presidency by electoral chicanery against a wealthy white conservative minority that controls the nation’s media, its banks and, apparently, the Federal Electoral Institute (IFE), Mexico’s ultimate electoral authority. López Obrador charges the IFE and its president, Luis Carlos Ugalde, with orchestrating Calderón’s uncertain triumph.

At a raucous rally July 8 that put hundreds of thousands of supporters in Mexico City’s vast Zocalo plaza, the political heart of the nation, López Obrador called upon his people to demand a complete vote-by-vote recount of the results. Speaking from a flatbed truck set up in front of the National Palace, the official seat of the Mexican government, the former Mexico City mayor characterized President Vicente Fox as “a traitor to democracy” and accused the IFE of electoral fraud.

Indeed, fraud was the central motif of the mammoth meeting. Large photos of Ugalde slugged “Wanted for Electoral Fraud” were slapped up on central city walls, and tens of thousands of protesters waved homemade signs dissing the IFE official in colorful epithets unfit for publication on this website. Throughout the rally (which was billed as an “informative assembly”), the huge throng repeatedly drowned out López Obrador’s pronouncements with thunderous chants of “No to Fraude Electoral!”

The gathering in the Zocalo signaled the kickoff to what some here call “the second election in the street,” an effort to pressure electoral officials into a ballot-by-ballot recount that López Obrador is convinced will show that he was the winner of the July 2 election. The IFE has resisted such a recount.

A gifted leader of street protest, López Obrador is always at the top of his game when he is seen as an underdog battling the rich and powerful. He has called upon supporters in all of Mexico’s 300 electoral districts to initiate a national march on Wednesday that will converge on the capital on Sunday for what may turn out to be the largest political demonstration in the nation’s history. Indeed, López Obrador already set that mark in April 2005 when 1.2 million citizens surged through Mexico City to protest Fox’s efforts to bar the him from the ballot. Fox abandoned his vendetta three days after the march.

But López Obrador and his Party of the Democratic Revolution (PRD) will not just do battle in the streets. Evidence of widespread ballot box manipulation was presented to the nation’s top electoral tribunal (known as TRIFE) by the Sunday midnight deadline in an effort to persuade the seven justices that a hand recount is the only way to determine who will be the next president of Mexico. Such recounts have recently been conducted in close elections in Germany, Italy and Costa Rica.

Calderón and the PAN and Ugalde’s IFE consider López Obrador’s demands to open the ballot boxes an “insult” to the “hundreds of thousands of citizens” who were responsible for carrying out the election. “The votes have already been counted–on Election Day,” Ugalde declared.

The TRIFE is an autonomous judicial body with powers to annul the presidential election. In recent years it has annulled elections in Tabasco (López Obrador’s home state) and Colima and invalidated results in entire districts because of electoral flimflam in recent years. López Obrador and the PRD have also petitioned Mexico’s Supreme Court to invalidate the election because of Vicente Fox’s apparently unconstitutional meddling on behalf of Calderón. López Obrador is reportedly considering calling upon all PRD elected officials not to take office December 1 if the ballots are not recounted, a strategy that could trigger a constitutional crisis.

Despite the uncertainty about who won the July 2 election, the White House and US Ambassador Tony Garza have been quick to congratulate Felipe Calderón, for whom they exhibited an undisguised predilection during the campaigns. Garza has been lavish in his praise of the much-questioned performance of the IFE.

The next days will be heady and historic ones for this ancient land. Tens of thousands of “people the color of the earth,” as Subcomandante Marcos has named them, will be marching along the nation’s highways headed toward the capital with one word in their hearts: Justicia! It is what they have always demanded from one failed revolution to another. Will their voices finally be heard?

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x