May 26, 1868: President Andrew Johnson, Impeached by the House, Is Acquitted by the Senate

May 26, 1868: President Andrew Johnson, Impeached by the House, Is Acquitted by the Senate

May 26, 1868: President Andrew Johnson, Impeached by the House, Is Acquitted by the Senate

"The greatest of all questions for the American people is, whether amongst all the troubles and changes of this and coming ages the popular respect for the forms of law, for judicial purity and independence, can be maintained."

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Johnson had been impeached ostensibly for removing Lincoln-appointed Secretary of War Edwin Stanton from office without Congressional approval, as required by a bill Congress had passed to prevent just such an action. The real fight, however, was about the course of Reconstruction in the South: the white supremacist Johnson wanted to allow the Southern states back into the Union with scarcely a slap on the wrist, while the Radical Republicans who controlled Congress sought to ensure black political rights.

“At no time was the editorial position of The Nation well defined” on the question of Johnson’s impeachment, William M. Armstrong, the biographer of founding editor E.L. Godkin, once wrote. The magazine wavered over whether to support the proceedings at all, first opposing and then enthusiastically endorsing them, before ultimately shrugging its shoulders and saying everyone should hang. This editorial (“The Result of the Trial,” E.L. Godkin, May 21, 1868) predicting the president’s imminent acquittal says that Johnson deserved conviction, but the Radicals who had orchestrated the proceedings were demagogues and no less worthy of removal from office than the man who stood accused of abusing the powers of the presidency. In 1868, The Nation was moving rapidly away from its abolitionist origins, becoming more dismissive of Reconstruction as it began to be convinced by largely specious reports of corrupt and inept governments rising to power, on the strength of the black vote, in the South.

The issue of the impeachment trial was no doubt important as regards the actual political situation; but the greatest of all questions for the American people is, whether amongst all the troubles and changes of this and coming ages the popular respect for the forms of law, for judicial purity and independence, can be maintained. As long as it can, all will go well, whatever storms blow; whenever the belief becomes general that a court of justice, and especially a “High Court,” can be fairly used, whenever the majority please, as the instrument of their will, it will make little difference what its judgment will be or who fills the Presidential chair.

May 26, 1868

To mark The Nation’s 150th anniversary, every morning this year The Almanac will highlight something that happened that day in history and how The Nation covered it. Get The Almanac every day (or every week) by signing up to the e-mail newsletter.

An urgent message from the Editors

As the editors of The Nation, it’s not usually our role to fundraise. Today, however, we’re putting out a special appeal to our readers, because there are only hours left in 2025 and we’re still $20,000 away from our goal of $75,000. We need you to help close this gap. 

Your gift to The Nation directly supports the rigorous, confrontational, and truly independent journalism that our country desperately needs in these dark times.

2025 was a terrible year for press freedom in the United States. Trump launched personal attack after personal attack against journalists, newspapers, and broadcasters across the country, including multiple billion-dollar lawsuits. The White House even created a government website to name and shame outlets that report on the administration with anti-Trump bias—an exercise in pure intimidation.

The Nation will never give in to these threats and will never be silenced. In fact, we’re ramping up for a year of even more urgent and powerful dissent. 

With the 2026 elections on the horizon, and knowing Trump’s history of false claims of fraud when he loses, we’re going to be working overtime with writers like Elie Mystal, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Jeet Heer, Kali Holloway, Katha Pollitt, and Chris Lehmann to cut through the right’s spin, lies, and cover-ups as the year develops.

If you donate before midnight, your gift will be matched dollar for dollar by a generous donor. We hope you’ll make our work possible with a donation. Please, don’t wait any longer.

In solidarity,

The Nation Editors

Ad Policy
x