On Loving Queer Kids

On Loving Queer Kids

When faced with something so painful as gay teen suicide, it’s easy to scapegoat child bullies.  It’s hard to create a world that wants queer youth to live and thrive.


When I read that 18-year-old Rutgers freshman Tyler Clementi had committed suicide by jumping off the George Washington Bridge days after two students streamed a video of him hooking up with another man, my heart sank. Tyler grew up in New Jersey and played the violin, and I did too. I don’t know what life was like for Tyler before he chose to end it, but my early high school years were spent improvising survival strategies. I mentally plotted the corridors where the jocks hung out and avoided them. I desperately tried to never go to the bathroom during the school day. I was Asian and gay, stood 5-foot-2, weighed 95 pounds and when I got excited about something, my voice cracked into a register normally heard among Hannah Montana fans. If it weren’t for the fact that I ran really fast and talked even faster and enjoyed the protection of a few popular kids—well, it’s not hard to imagine a similar fate.

I say all this not to elicit pity—I’m a bigger boy now, and I bash back—but to make it clear that I’m conditioned to abhor people who bully queer kids. There’s nothing that raises my hackles more than seeing an effeminate boy being teased. But I also find myself reluctant to join the voices calling for the law to come down hard on Dharun Ravi and Molly Wei, the Rutgers students who streamed the video and who are now facing "invasion of privacy" charges. If convicted they could get up to five years in prison; the gay rights group Garden State Equality is calling the incident a hate crime, and if the two are prosecuted under New Jersey’s hate crimes law, their sentence could double.

What Ravi and Wei did was immature, prurient and thoughtless; it undoubtedly played some role in what became an awful tragedy. That they acted with homophobic malice, that they understood what the consequences of their actions might be or that their prank alone—or even chiefly—triggered Clementi’s suicide is far less clear. There’s no record of Ravi or Wei discriminating against gays in the past, and there’s nothing exceptionally homophobic about the tweet Ravi sent—"I saw him making out with a dude. Yay." One could easily insert "fat chick" or "jerking off to porn" into the scenario, which wouldn’t have made it any more acceptable for Ravi and Wei to surreptitiously broadcast the incident, but might have provided just as much inducement anyway. More important, we know virtually nothing about Clementi’s life, including how he felt about his sexuality or whether he found affirmation of it at home, among his friends or at school.

But for some gays and liberals shaken by Clementi’s suicide, the complexities and unknowns don’t seem to matter. It’s convenient to make Ravi and Wei into little monsters singularly responsible for his death. In the words of Malcolm Lazin—the director of Equality Forum, a gay rights group calling for "murder by manslaughter" charges, a demand echoed on sympathetic blogs and Facebook pages—the duo’s conduct was "willful and premeditated," an act so "shocking, malicious and heinous" that Ravi and Wei "had to know" it would be "emotionally explosive." Every one of these accusations is entirely speculative, a fact that you’d think Lazin, a former assistant US Attorney, would bear in mind before rounding up the firing squad.

Clementi’s is the latest in a rash of suicides by gay teenagers, most of them boys. Since September 1 that body count includes Billy Lucas, a 15-year-old from Indiana who hanged himself after repeatedly being called a "fag" by his classmates; Asher Brown, a 13-year-old Texan who shot himself after his fellow students performed "mock gay acts" on him during gym class; and 13-year-old Seth Walsh from California, who hanged himself from a tree in his backyard after being teased for years for being gay. In each of these cases, news reports focused almost exclusively on the bullies—other teenage kids—as the perpetrators in what’s been dubbed "an epidemic of antigay bullying." In each of these cases, liberals and gays expressed dismay that the bullies weren’t being charged with crimes. Few of the reports asked what home life was like for these gay teens or looked into what role teachers, schools and the community played in creating an environment where the only escape from such torment seemed to be death. And at least initially, too few drew the line to the messages mainstream adult America, especially its politicians, sends every day.

That silence was shattered in the wake of comments made by New York Republican gubernatorial candidate Carl Paladino on October 10 to an audience of Orthodox Jewish leaders. Speaking just hours after eight members of the Latin King Goonies gang were arrested for torturing and beating three gay men in the Bronx, Paladino said that children should not be "brainwashed into thinking that homosexuality is an equally valid and successful option." The incident provided a succinct lesson: words matter. Even if they don’t directly incite violence, hateful utterances from the political class allow people to think of gays and lesbians as less than human, as deserving of contempt, assault, murder.

Paladino is not alone in pandering to homophobia and letting the fists fall where they may. Senator Jim DeMint of South Carolina is in the news of late for doubling down on his 2004 statement that out gay people (and unwed mothers) should be banned from teaching in public schools. New Hampshire Senate candidate Kelly Ayotte and Nevada Senate candidate Sharron Angle support making gay adoption illegal, as did Florida’s Charlie Crist until he flipped his position and tacked to the center in his race against Tea Partyer Marco Rubio, who still supports the ban. These right-wing policies would discriminate against gay adults, but what fuels them is the anxiety that having openly gay men and women teaching and raising kids would make it known to children that being gay is a survivable, "equally valid," even joyous, condition. The real targets here are queer kids, and the message is quite simple: please don’t exist.

At least the right is relatively honest in its brutality. Oregon has no ban on gay teachers, but that didn’t stop the Beaverton school district, located just outside lefty Portland, from removing Seth Stambaugh from his fourth-grade classroom. A 23-year-old teaching intern, Stambaugh responded to a student’s question about why he wasn’t married by saying that gay marriage is illegal in Oregon. A spokeswoman for the school board claimed that the action wasn’t discriminatory but rather based on concerns about Stambaugh’s "professional judgment and age appropriateness."

And there you have a pithy example of the limits of liberal tolerance; even in communities that would denounce the DeMints of the world, a palpable phobia remains when it comes to the children. Gay teachers should teach, until they teach about the plain realities of being gay. (It’s this vacuum in education that inspired Dan Savage’s direct-to-teen YouTube campaign It Gets Better.) Let’s just have the kids figure it out themselves and come out when they’re all grown up rather than ask questions we’d rather not try to answer: What does the "closet" mean for a kid who announces she’s gay when she’s 11, or 5? What to make of the fact that your little boy begs to dress exclusively like Taylor Swift? Is he gay or trans or just going through a phase—and oh, God, isn’t not knowing the worst of it?

Even for liberals who like to think of themselves as pro-gay, this is uncharted territory, little discussed except perhaps in the deepest corners of Park-est Slope. So when faced with something so painful and complicated as gay teen suicide, it’s easier to go down the familiar path, to invoke the wrath of law and order, to create scapegoats out of child bullies who ape the denials and anxieties of adults, to blame it on technology or to pare down homophobia into a social menace called "antigay bullying" and then confine it within the borders of the schoolyard.

It’s tougher, more uncertain work creating a world that loves queer kids, that wants them to live and thrive. But try—try as if someone’s life depended on it. Imagine saying, I really wish my son turns out to be gay. Imagine hoping that your 2-year-old daughter grows up to be transgendered. Imagine not assuming the gender of your child’s future prom date or spouse; imagine keeping that space blank or occupied by boys and girls of all types. Imagine petitioning your local board of education to hire more gay elementary school teachers.

Now imagine a world in which Tyler Clementi climbed up onto a ledge on the George Washington Bridge—and chose to climb back down instead. It’s harder to do than you might think.Richard Kim

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy