Ilya Sheyman’s Progressive Run

Ilya Sheyman’s Progressive Run

To truly win back the House, we need to elect progressives.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Update on Ilya, March 19:

Heading into Tuesday’s Democratic primary, a new poll shows Ilya Sheyman now leading conservative Democrat Brad Schneider by eighteen points. Looks like Sheyman’s smart approach to campaigning is paying off—speaking directly to voters about his commitment to economic opportunity and fairness, and how government and community support helped his own family find success after immigrating to this country. Representative Raul Grijalva, co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, has asked people to join him and all voters in the district.

“We don’t need another Democrat In Name Only in Congress—they’ve done enough harm killing the public option and watering down Wall Street reform. We need Ilya Sheyman as a strong progressive ally. If Ilya wins it will send a national message to all Democratic candidates that if you campaign boldly on progressive principles, you can win,” said Grijalva.

* * *

The fight to win back the House—just like the fights to hold the White House and Senate—will not be easy. In order to not only win but to move any kind of agenda that addresses tax equity, environmental policy, immigration reform, housing, you name it, simply reinforcing the current Democratic narrative while being pulled further to the right by the Blue Dogs just isn’t enough. We need a more democratic—note small “d”—House.

We need to elect progressives.

Former Senator Russ Feingold recognizes that need and was moved to make his first endorsement in a Democratic primary since leaving the Senate. On Tuesday, Feingold pledged his support and that of Progressives United—his recently formed group focused on opposing corporate power—to Ilya Sheyman, a 25-year-old community organizer running in Illinois 10th District for a shot at the incumbent, Republican Representative Robert Dold.

While some Democratic candidates might look to co-opt the spirit and convictions of the Occupy movement, Sheyman is authentically of, by and for the 99 percent, ready to go to Washington and work with a strong grassroots to rebuild economic opportunity and fairness.

“Ilya knows that being a true progressive is more than a slogan. His campaign has mobilized and united hundreds of volunteers demanding a fresh, strong voice in Congress,” said Feingold. “This is exactly the type of candidate we as progressives must support, and with the primary almost here, now is exactly the time to step up and take action.”

Sheyman and his family came to Illinois from the former Soviet Union as Jewish refugees when he was 4 years old. His family worked its way up from living in a motel on the north side of Chicago, to eventually owning a home in the town of Buffalo Grove. His dad worked as a pizza deliverer before finally starting two small businesses with Sheyman’s mom.

In high school, Sheyman became involved in progressive politics. He was an outspoken leader against the war in Iraq from the outset. He led a walk-out from his school and founded a local chapter of Patriots for Peace.

After college he worked as a community organizer to address a broken public education funding system and help citizens gain access to government and social services. He later served as the national mobilization director at MoveOn, where he led their campaign for healthcare reform with a public option.

Sheyman told me his own story wouldn’t be possible without the assistance of core public programs.

“From the public schools and federal Stafford Loans that allowed me to get a world class education, to the Medicare and Social Security benefits my 94-year-old grandmother depends on every day—it’s clear that my own story is only possible because alongside our hard work, at every step of the way, my family received the support of our community and government. That’s why I’ll fight to defend the safety net that built the middle class in this country,” he said.

Sheyman’s endorsements reflect his progressive authenticity. In addition to Feingold’s support, the Congressional Progressive Caucus co-chairs, Representatives Raul Grijalva and Keith Ellison, have both endorsed. He’s the only candidate to receive endorsements from members of the Illinois delegation, with the backing of Representatives Danny Davis and Jesse Jackson Jr.; former Democratic National Committee Chairman, Governor Howard Dean, has also endorsed. Other notable supporters include Democracy for America, the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, and Citizen Action/Illinois; and the vast majority of labor support including AFSCME Council 31, Illinois Federation of Teachers, Sheet Metal Workers Local 73 and the International Longshoremen’s Association-AFL-CIO.

The March 20 primary is shaping up to be a real bellwether for what happens when a truly progressive candidate runs against a so-called “moderate” Democrat endorsed by the party establishment. In this case, Sheyman’s main competition is businessman Brad Schneider, endorsed by House minority whip Steny Hoyer.

Schneider is struggling mightily to re-brand himself as “a solid progressive” after giving thousands of dollars to Republicans including Illinois Senator Mark Kirk, Nebraska Senator Mike Johanns, Utah Senator Robert Bennett and Representative Mark Kennedy of Minnesota.

But according to Daniel Mintz, national director of coordinated campaigns for MoveOn.org Political Action, that record of supporting “hard core Republicans” hasn’t stopped Schneider from sending a slew of direct mail to voters showing “picture after picture” of the candidate with tags like “progressive,” or “experienced progressive” or “progressive Democrat.”

“Clearly that’s how his polling showed him he needs to run to be competitive,” says Mintz. “But what kind of progressive has given thousands of dollars to right-wing, anti-choice Republicans? His strategy has been to pitch himself as a progressive and at debates begin every other phrase with, ‘I really agree with what Ilya just said.’ ”

Indeed, polling in early January indicated that when choosing a Democratic candidate voters in the district were more than twice as likely to pick someone “more progressive” over someone “more moderate” by a margin of 64 percent to 25 percent.

“As a result, this race is being fought all on progressive, 99 percent issues,” says Mintz. “Ilya’s been running on 99 percent issues from the start—talking about the fact that the good jobs have all gone away and the playing field just isn’t level anymore, and that Washington isn’t paying attention to any of that. He’s been talking about putting the American Dream back in reach for the middle-class and those who aspire to it, and protecting Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.”

The district is an economically diverse one—some neighborhoods are suffering 12 to 18 percent unemployment and others are among the wealthiest communities in the country. But polls show that of these four issues—Wall Street and corporate accountability, social issues like choice, jobs and Israel—Wall Street accountability and jobs tie as most important to the district’s voters (37 percent) with social issues (12 percent) and Israel (4 percent) far behind.

Sheyman attributes a shift in the district’s political conversation to the success of Occupy.

“When we started this campaign with house parties and coffees back in March [2010], the first question would invariably be, ‘How do you deal with the deficit? What program do you want to cut?’ ” Sheyman said. “Now the first question is, ‘How do we put people back to work?’ and ‘How do we restore some fairness to the tax system?’ No matter what happens from here on out Occupy Wall Street has already succeeded, they’ve shifted our national dialogue to the conversation we need to have.”

While Schneider got in the race early and had a strong first quarter in fundraising, Mintz says “ever since then, once people realized there was a real progressive in the race, Schneider has been unable to show any fundraising growth.”

On the other hand, Sheyman’s fundraising has grown every quarter and topped Schneider’s fundraising in every report since June. His report for the first two months of this year was his strongest yet, and unlike Schneider, none of his contributions came from his own pocket. He now has over 16,000 individual contributors—one of the largest donor bases of any non-incumbent in the country—and that’s sure to grow with Feingold’s endorsement.

The naysayers are pointing to a recent poll conducted by the Schneider campaign that shows him with a 29 percent to 14 percent lead over Sheyman, and as “lead[ing] Sheyman on being progressive on the issues.” But even this poll shows a plurality of voters undecided and it was conducted right after a massive mail campaign by Schneider to increase his name recognition. Mintz says more recent private polling indicates that any lead of Schneider’s “has evaporated.”

With the March 20 primary less than two weeks away, this is the moment to use new media to contact voters directly in the district, and tap into movement energy to support a progressive candidate who will represent the people without mortgaging himself to the special interests.

Sheyman certainly sees the stakes and the opportunity for a movement win.

“We can send a message that when Democrats stand up with backbone and conviction for the progressive values that built the middle class in this country, we win,” he told me. “This is our moment to send a new generation of proven, progressive leadership to Washington to focus on how we put our people back to work, how we restore fairness to our tax system and how we invest in America again. This election is not just about turning a red seat blue, it’s about rebuilding our middle class and restoring the American Dream.”

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x