After Jackson Loses Its Radical Mayor, a Movement Spreads in the South

After Jackson Loses Its Radical Mayor, a Movement Spreads in the South

After Jackson Loses Its Radical Mayor, a Movement Spreads in the South

Still mourning Chokwe Lumumba, progressives gather to push his vision for worker-owned co-ops.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

The Jackson Rising: New Economies Conference, held on the campus of Jackson State University, went off without a hitch the first weekend in May. That, in itself, was testament to something new growing in the heart of the South.

Conceived as part of Jackson Mayor Chokwe Lumumba’s plan to develop Mississippi’s crumbling capital from the bottom up, Jackson Rising ended up taking place just two months after Lumumba’s sudden death, less than two weeks after the election of a new mayor, and days after the key leadership of Lumumba’s administration—including many of the conference’s organizers—found themselves out of office and out of a job.

Jackson is a pre–Civil War city whose city hall was built by slaves. With a population of 175,000, it is home to some of the poorest citizens in the nation and has a higher percentage of African-Americans (80 percent) than any other city except Detroit. Mayor Lumumba, a longtime activist, was elected in June 2013 on a pledge to reduce poverty and narrow the enduring wealth gap. 

One of the ways he intended to tackle inequality was through strict contracting and procurement rules. Jackson was, and still is, under a federal mandate to upgrade its crumbling sewer system. So, despite qualms, Lumumba supported a 1 percent sales tax hike to be spent specifically on infrastructure, which voters approved this past January. While in the past a vast majority of city contracts went to businesses owned and operated by nonresidents, Lumumba assured voters that the lion’s share would be spent locally. And where there weren’t enough locally owned businesses, his administration intended to cultivate new ones, in part by incubating worker-owned cooperatives.

By pooling resources and spreading risk, worker-owned co-ops give low-income people a low-barrier way to start their own companies. But to grow to scale, co-ops need reliable financing and, ideally, ”anchor” clients. With an estimated $1 billion to be spent on repair in the coming decades, Lumumba and his team were exploring the possibility of seeding local co-ops with municipal contracts.

“We thought we would have more time, but we’re moving ahead the vision,” said Kali Akuno, Lumumba’s right-hand man on Jackson Rising.

It’s unlikely that Akuno and friends will capture significant resources from municipal coffers now. Although the City Council voted to support Jackson Rising right after Lumumba’s death, no city funds were committed, and at the last minute, incoming Mayor Tony Yarber’s office rejected requests that the city cover insurance and campus security. (A business-friendly pastor and former school principal, Yarber beat Lumumba’s son in a runoff in April.)

Yet, in some ways, the turnabout in Jackson only underscored one of the main themes hammered home by the speakers at Jackson Rising. As Saladin Muhammad of Black Workers for Justice put it, rather than an end in themselves, “Worker co-ops have to be part of a broader democracy movement.”

There’s a long history in the South of a very pragmatic approach to co-ops.

“Name any famous African-American leader—Ella Baker, [W.E.B.] Du Bois, Marcus Garvey, A. Philip Randolph—they were all proponents of co-ops,” said Jessica Gordon Nembhard, author of Collective Courage: A History of African American Cooperative Economic Thought and Practice. They had good reason. In the civil rights years, blacks who registered to vote tended to lose their jobs, and sharecroppers who housed activists faced eviction.  

When the legendary Highlander Folk School started in Tennessee in 1932, it trained successive generations of movement leaders (including Rosa Parks and Fannie Lou Hamer) in supporting poor workers to form unions as well as poor farmers to form co-ops. They were two parallel responses to the same grim set of conditions. Yet “sometime after civil rights, the economic piece dropped out,” said Elandria Williams, of what is now the Highlander Research and Education Center, which endorsed the conference.

The hyper-concentration of capital in twenty-first-century America has sparked a surge of enthusiasm about co-operative economics. Like Williams, many came to Jackson on a mission to reconnect co-ops to politics.

“Especially in Mississippi, we spend a lot of time speaking truth to power. Now is the time for us to speak truth to ourselves and build some power to determine our future,” said Ed Whitfield of the Fund for Democratic Communities, a conference sponsor.

As a jump-starter for local co-ops, Jackson Rising may have fallen short. Although the turnout topped 500, according to organizers, the $25 registration fee probably discouraged local participation. Outsiders outnumbered locals. But those who did attend included veterans from Highlander, the Southern Grassroots Economies Project and the US Social Forum. 

The result was a conference that brought together white co-op fans and black revolutionaries, among others. It was a productive mix. Are co-ops a way in or a way out of the capitalist system? Is it progressive to work minimal hours, with little return, to bootstrap your co-op? What if your co-op depends on gasoline or conflict-zone minerals? Those aren’t questions co-op worker-owners often grapple with. But they got a vigorous airing at Jackson Rising, enough to prod Mississippi for Liberty, a Tea Party–style Super PAC, to accuse the state-funded university of sponsoring “nothing more than thinly veiled communism.”

Melvin “Ricky” Maclin, of the New Era Windows Cooperative in Chicago (formerly Republic Windows and Doors), didn’t give that sort of talk much pause. Born just a few hundred miles away, Maclin recalled, “I was a sharecropper, picking other people’s cotton on other people’s land for next to nothing. Now… I have my own company. It’s a really empowering feeling.”

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x