Freedom of Speech for Students?

Freedom of Speech for Students?

Philadelphia court asked to decide if schools can punish students for derisive online communications from home computers.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Interesting story from AP recently regarding the question of whether public school officials can discipline students for posting lewd, harassing or juvenile comments from off-campus computers.

A US appeals court heard arguments last Thursday in Philadelphia, where two students from two different Pennsylvania school districts are fighting suspensions they received for posting derisive profiles of their principals on MySpace from home computers.

The American Civil Liberties Union joined the case and argued that school officials infringe on student’s free speech rights when they reach beyond school grounds in such cases to impose discipline.

A lawyer for the Hermitage School District in western Pennsylvania, though, offered a different view. "It’s not a matter of where you throw the grenade, it’s where the grenade lands," Anthony Sanchez said.

As MaryClaire Dale reported for AP, legal experts hope the Supreme Court will soon clarify the limits of school discipline for online speech that is posted offsite.

What do you think? Let us know in the comments field below.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x