Amnesty or Border Security?

Amnesty or Border Security?

Washington editor Chris Hayes and Pat Buchanan debate immigration reform.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Morning Joe heats up when Pat Buchanan and The Nation‘s Washington editor Chris Hayes debate immigration reform. Hayes argues that the only solution is comprehensive immigration reform, based on his opinion that immigration will achieve a level of equilibrium based on the labor market. Buchanan argues that the solution is as simple as securing the borders first then going after each business that hires illegal immigrants. But the arguments become less clear-cut when the issue of sanctioned racial profiling comes into play.

"Being in the country illegally is not a crime. It is a civil infraction, it is not a criminal infraction," Hayes explains. "This is an important distinction." Buchanan counters with, "Thanks for the ACLU argument…American people have said very clearly we don’t want a path to citizenship, we don’t want amnesty, we want the laws of the United States enforced. Why is the President of the United States…not enforcing laws?" But Hayes disagrees, arguing that enforcing the borders is impractical. And Buchanan argues that granting amnesty will only entice more illegal immigrants to come.

Host Joe Scarborough summed it up best when he said, "It doesn’t help politically for Democrats to support sending illegal immigrants back, and it doesn’t help Republicans in the long-term to be seen as overly harsh."

–Morgan Ashenfelter

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x