A Flawed Resolution

A Flawed Resolution

With its blueprint for Iraq in tatters, the Bush Administration has been forced to recognize the United Nations as the only body that can confer legitimacy on its continued occupation.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

With its blueprint for Iraq in tatters, the Bush Administration has been forced to recognize the United Nations as the only body that can confer legitimacy on its continued occupation. In contrast to its disdainful dismissal of the views of the UN before the war, the White House repeatedly gave ground to win support of a Security Council resolution approving a new interim government.

In addition to agreeing to give Iraqi leaders control over their own security forces, the White House was forced to consent to a specific time limit for the multinational force it will command and to give the Iraqi government the right to ask American troops to leave before the expiration of the mandate on January 1, 2006. It also moved a little on the question of Iraqi control over US military actions, agreeing to consult and coordinate about fundamental issues, including “policy on sensitive offensive operations.” This is progress of a sort, a small victory for multilateralism and global politics by negotiation.

Despite the resolution, realities on the ground cannot be denied: The interim government is a creature of the United States, and US troops will still be viewed as an occupying force, with all the potential for violence that entails. Iraqis overwhelmingly want to run their own affairs, and they want US troops to leave. The UN, by bestowing its imprimatur, has provided an illusion of legitimacy, but events are likely to render that illusion temporary.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x