Paul Newman:In His Own Words

Paul Newman:In His Own Words

Paul Newman refers all letters relative to this article to Toys “R” Us.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

AP ImagesPaul Newman, actor and progressive activist.

EDITOR’S NOTE: Paul Newman, one of the greatest actors of his generation and an ardent advocate for peace and progressive causes, died Friday at 83. A great friend and supporter of The Nation, Newman also was an occasional contributor to the magazine. In this piece, written in August 2000, he cast the nuclear arms race in characteristically sardonic and deeply personal terms. We will miss him.
 

My grandson, Pete, is simultaneously perusing the New York Times and playing chess with our next-door neighbor, who chortles and takes Pete’s rook.

Pete is four and a half and is about to overtake Leonardo da Vinci, both in art and science. The neighbor is 43, an ex-intelligence officer and a spokesperson for the Pentagon’s Ballistic Missile Defense Organization. He outweighs Pete by 191 pounds but, as noted, is no match for the kid upstairs, if you get my meaning.

The big guy captures Pete’s rook. “You are weak on defense, kiddo,” he chortles.

Pete slithers his queen across the board. “Checkmate,” says the kid. “You are weak on defense, here and at work.” He points to the headline:

Key Missile Parts Are Left Untested as Booster Fails

“His team just flunked yet another of many missile tests, Gramps. A leaky defense umbrella, if ever I saw one.”

“We only flunked the first, most proven, reliable stage of the test, kiddo,” says the big guy. “The most sophisticated, complicated, experimental, unsuccessful, least likely elements of the test never got a chance to fail, so how do you know they wouldn’t succeed? As Defense Secretary Cohen said, ‘The test was a disappointment, but it was one of those failures that was at least expected.'”

“Congressman Curt Weldon was on the Lehrer NewsHour,” I venture. “He bulged his eyes and pumped his face full of blood and shouted at me through the television, ‘How much is New York City worth?!! Is it $60 billion or $100 billion?!!!'”

“That question is a mindless and clever smokescreen,” says Pete. “The real question is, Are they playing a joke on New York by suggesting that $60 billion will buy protection for the city? If I were a cynical little boy, I’d say those billions will buy job protection for incumbent congressmen and zip for the guy in a taxi.”

“You really know how to hurt a fella, don’t you, kid?” says the big guy.

“You guys rigged the only successful missile test. You put a beacon in the decoy. Why don’t you put a beacon in Congressman Weldon’s nose? Maybe you could rig the next election for him as well.”

“Maybe what I could do,” the big guy speculates, “is to have my guys set up the target again at Vandenberg, the interceptor at Kwajalein, start the countdown again–ten, nine, eight, y’know, get to ONE and then–I shut down the power! That way nothing fails, fizzles or flops. Everything will be A-OK.”

“Power on or power off,” says the kid, “I’ll bet you set off the beacons in the noses of Boeing, Raytheon, TRW and Lockheed Martin that start up the giant vacuum cleaners that suck money out of the Treasury.”

The big guy is not listening. He is ecstatic.

“We can bypass all testing, all budgets, the whole system. If things get nuts we just push the ON button!”

The kid heads upstairs.

“Why don’t you call Toys “R” Us?” he says. “See what they have in their arsenal.”

The big guy’s eyes go glassy with the possibilities.

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x