April 14, 1939: John Steinbeck Publishes ‘The Grapes of Wrath’

April 14, 1939: John Steinbeck Publishes ‘The Grapes of Wrath’

April 14, 1939: John Steinbeck Publishes ‘The Grapes of Wrath’

"The chapters in which Steinbeck halts the story to editorialize about American life are sometimes useful, but oftener pretentious and flatulent."

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

In 1936, Steinbeck had published in The Nation a report, “Dubious Battle in California,” on the perils facing migrant workers in California (it is included in our 150th-anniversary issue). Steinbeck was named in The Nation’s Honor Roll for 1939 (an ongoing Nation tradition) for “dramatizing…the desperate plight of the migratory farm worker in California and the political and economic forces arrayed against him.” In the same paragraph, future Nation editor Carey McWilliams was cited for “documenting“ the same in his non-fiction work, Factories in the Field, often considered a non-fictional accompaniment to Grapes of Wrath. Steinbeck’s opus was pointedly (and, the editor of The Almanac would aver, justly) tweaked in the Nation of April 15, 1939 by the critic Louis Kronenberger, in a review titled “Hungry Caravan.”

The Grapes of Wrath is a superb tract because it exposes something terrible and true with enormous vigor. It is a superb tract, moreover, by virtue of being thoroughly animated fiction, by virtue of living scenes and living characters (like Ma), not by virtue of discursive homilies and dead characters (like the socialistic preacher). One comes away moved, indignant, protesting, pitying. But one comes away dissatisfied, too, aware that The Grapes of Wrath is too unevenly weighted, too uneconomically proportioned, the work of a writer who is still self-indulgent, still undisciplined, still not altogether aware of the difference in value of various human emotions. The picturesqueness of the Joads, for example, is fine wherever it makes them live more abundantly, but false when simply laid on for effect. Steinbeck’s sentimentalism is good in bringing him close to the lives of his people, but bad when it blurs his insight. Again, the chapters in which Steinbeck halts the story to editorialize about American life are sometimes useful, but oftener pretentious and flatulent.

April 14, 1939

To mark The Nation’s 150th anniversary, every morning this year The Almanac will highlight something that happened that day in history and how The Nation covered it. Get The Almanac every day (or every week) by signing up to the e-mail newsletter.

Your support makes stories like this possible

From illegal war on Iran to an inhumane fuel blockade of Cuba, from AI weapons to crypto corruption, this is a time of staggering chaos, cruelty, and violence. 

Unlike other publications that parrot the views of authoritarians, billionaires, and corporations, The Nation publishes stories that hold the powerful to account and center the communities too often denied a voice in the national media—stories like the one you’ve just read.

Each day, our journalism cuts through lies and distortions, contextualizes the developments reshaping politics around the globe, and advances progressive ideas that oxygenate our movements and instigate change in the halls of power. 

This independent journalism is only possible with the support of our readers. If you want to see more urgent coverage like this, please donate to The Nation today.

Ad Policy
x